tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post3039656806071606222..comments2023-12-23T23:32:04.326-05:00Comments on Reblogging Donk: Oh, look, The Times is on it now.Jacyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06185346892316042054noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-76234515864088708502009-02-18T19:32:00.000-05:002009-02-18T19:32:00.000-05:00Not a positive article at all, and indeed it makes...Not a positive article at all, and indeed it makes no difference how she interprets it. Her access is only granted by those companies failing to do adequate research, and the big, important ones will do just that before paying anyone to do anything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-28370798459608462252009-02-18T14:41:00.000-05:002009-02-18T14:41:00.000-05:00Krap also comes across as someone you can't trust ...Krap also comes across as someone you can't trust and whose business you should avoid.<BR/><BR/>And while JABA may be delusional enough to be happy about today's NY Times coverage, any sane being who reads this coverage has to recoil and make a mental note to avoid dealing with this flake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-42200018308438133282009-02-18T14:36:00.000-05:002009-02-18T14:36:00.000-05:00You know, i am not so sure i believe this 'any pub...You know, i am not so sure i believe this 'any publicity is good publicity' mantra as a long term strategy.<BR/><BR/>Only sometimes is it okay to be trashed by your critics because at least it means they are paying attention to you.<BR/><BR/>However, i am quite certain that a constant drubbing in the media is not the path towards a successful career. There needs to be something redeeming or else what is the point? It's like someone said last night, at some point you need to deliver a product. <BR/><BR/>The only product Jackles delivers is heaping more mockery upon herself and her associates.<BR/><BR/>This is a very bad article for Karp. Even if it does not sink in as negative for delusional Jackles, this has to pinch for Karp. He comes across as Jackles' bitch (lap doggy) and this can't be so hot for his ego.<BR/><BR/>That said, what do i know?SomeProblemshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10638834467663924973noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-989478223619706612009-02-18T14:21:00.000-05:002009-02-18T14:21:00.000-05:00Darlings, if you read the article, you'll see they...Darlings, if you read the article, you'll see they profiled her before.<BR/><BR/>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/nyregion/thecity/30sex.html?_r=1Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-48635635215334736482009-02-18T14:12:00.001-05:002009-02-18T14:12:00.001-05:00Yeah, Julia Allison is so totes getting her Mother...Yeah, Julia Allison is so totes getting her Mother Teresa on right now, rehearsing her best serious, wounded looks and soundbites about Internet civility. Also trying to figure out how to work her fave new phrase, "INformation architecture," into any interview she may be asked to give. Wait for it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-33914831562213862532009-02-18T14:12:00.000-05:002009-02-18T14:12:00.000-05:00No doubt her next bio for a conference will say th...No doubt her next bio for a conference will say that she's been talked about by the New York Times. Sigh.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-75186002788660405792009-02-18T14:11:00.000-05:002009-02-18T14:11:00.000-05:00Darling, you are so right. You are totally right. ...Darling, you are so right. You are totally right. That's why I hate that the Times covered this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-39055491491987142562009-02-18T14:05:00.000-05:002009-02-18T14:05:00.000-05:00Here's how Julia will see this:"Blah blah blah bla...Here's how Julia will see this:<BR/><BR/>"Blah blah blah blah JULIA blah blah blah Allison [...] is a bona fide celebrity."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-48609131572511193342009-02-18T13:52:00.000-05:002009-02-18T13:52:00.000-05:00Sorry, "covering his ASS."Sorry, "covering his ASS."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-21906062180133705202009-02-18T13:51:00.001-05:002009-02-18T13:51:00.001-05:00Umm, now Julia's name is in NYT. This is terrible....Umm, now Julia's name is in NYT. This is terrible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434803014232331503.post-26990746190416424542009-02-18T13:51:00.000-05:002009-02-18T13:51:00.000-05:00In taking Karp's bait, the NYT misses the point on...In taking Karp's bait, the NYT misses the point on why these blogs were taken down: <BR/><BR/>1. It CAN'T be about blogging anonymously, because half the people who use Tumblr don't put their names on their blogs. <BR/><BR/>2. It CAN'T be about reblogging others' content in a harassing way because Baugher hardly EVER used the reblogging feature. Same with Charlsie.<BR/><BR/>3. And it CAN'T be about creating a safe "community" either. Some people use the platform as just that - a platform - and do not wish to be a part of his 20-something hipster and holier-than thou "community." I was not aware that if I started a Tumblr I would be required to participate in that community by managing to somehow reblog yuppy drivel while only adding niceties in my responding comments. Where is THAT requirement in the TOS?<BR/><BR/>No, this is the case of a baby boy with no business sense covering his after after he deleted a number of blogs because it was in his BEST INTEREST TO DO SO - both to get future investments and to protect his own investments in NS. It's so clear. <BR/><BR/>And side note: Totally getting a kick out of The Times identifying Dr. Bobby in the accompanying picture as a blogger instead of a creator wonk eyes and waxy paraffin complexions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com