This is me doing my “FIERCE” hand movement. Do not try this at home.
This joke beyond tired even in my village of Omsk and she manage to make it six times -- SIX TIMES! -- including on the Twit. Is this the journalism she bray about?
Fierce? or Not Fierce?
I not kid. You see what I am meaning?
These are the trousers of my dreams.
Oh, really, poofy? Really? Is it because they remind you of these ones:
I just say.
I never get tired of this awful picture. How Jackles just looks so ROUND in those pants.
ReplyDeleteI know she isn't, but i never tire of seeing a hideous publicity stunt backfire.
She's so boring I can't even stand it.
ReplyDeleteAnd what is going on with Meghan's foot in that photo?
STOP IT, Russian Girl!
ReplyDeleteI cannot take your posts anymore. I will wind up in the hospital from heart failure. You are the funniest blogger I've ever read. I swear you are! I almost peed my pants when you wrote this:
"This joke beyond tired even in my village of Omsk and she manage to make it six times -- SIX TIMES! -- including on the Twit. Is this the journalism she bray about?"
LMAO
Since they're dressed like mimes, could they STFU like mimes, too?
ReplyDeleteRussian Girl, you made me spit out my apple cider. I dont care if you are really russian or really a girl, you kill me. Hands down funniest writer out there.
ReplyDeleteI really hope she interviewed him and said "fierce" about a dozen more times. I'm sure he never gets tired of that.
ReplyDeleteYou go, girl! Two snaps up, you hot tranny mess!
Bah, I thought top hats and bow ties were supposed to be teh sexy, like Playboy bunnies. Why are they dressed like Ringmasters from Hell's Circus? Is it a Tide commercial??
ReplyDeleteJA's hackneyed response to everything that doesn't look good on her:
ReplyDelete"I looked good in person. No really, I received so many compliments on my outfit, it just didn't photograph well. Blerg."
stop making fun of her weight
ReplyDeleteI not make fun of her weight. I make fun of her pants (which were too baggy, to be fairs).
ReplyDeleteJulia comments about her weight herself, (take a gander @ the convo on SM//TSAM site, and try to hold in your own after reading it entirely) haven't seen the authors here pointedly do so. She wants to be a celeb so bad, and make a show of being vain - she'll get the same treatment they do from a much more ruthless, much less forgiving internet. As you sow so shall you reap.
ReplyDeletethat better not be you julia at 1:25, go to bed!
ReplyDeleteanon @ 2:02- what do you mean by this "take a gander @ the convo on SM//TSAM site"
ReplyDeleteSM/TSAM?
"Fierce" is sooo over, Poofy.
ReplyDeleteAnon @ 2:49 -
ReplyDeleteScary Mary / There's Something About Mary
Cupcake fight between SM and JA!
ReplyDeleteI don't know if anybody else from here is a member of Loren Feldman's forum (http://www.1938media.com/forum) but HOLY SHIT, if you want to see the poofy one's cattiness come out, it's worth the $7 for a month.
ReplyDeleteCan we talk for a minute about how - literally - large Julia Allison's head is? In that circus clown photo, her top hat is barely resting on top of her giant noggin. I mean, I know it probably takes an abnormally large brain to be the governor of Internet manners, but geez it looks like she's housing Krang up in there.
ReplyDeleteHi bunnies, a little help please?
ReplyDeletehttp://captioncontest.tumblr.com
kthxbai.
I can't get over the way the hats fit. It's like bowls of porridge and Goldilocks. Ok, done. kthxbai again.
ReplyDeleteI have a stupid JA question..
ReplyDeleteWhy did JA get hair extensions if her natural hair so much better looking?
Call me Pollyanna, but what is the point of being so mean?
ReplyDeletehi JA
ReplyDeleteNo way JABA is up this early.
ReplyDeleteloling @ Jaba The Poof
ReplyDeletePollyanna, it's tough love.
RE: Extensions, she does it for the boys... they only like long hair, dontchaknow.
I'm just asking- I get the point of being critical of someone's journalistic abilities etc etc, but I guess I just don't see the point in being really mean. It just seems pathetic and kinda jealous. Why don't we keep it to valid criticisms?
ReplyDeletehmm really mean?
ReplyDeleteWe are going by JA's own definitions I think..
But I am sure when JA can stop being mean others can too..
Yes JA is up..check twitter
ReplyDeleteAnony 10:34
ReplyDeleteBecause that's not any fun.
The day she stops posting insane narcisstic photos and starts acting like a journalist, we'll treat her like a journalist. Sound fair?
ReplyDeleteI think we should just stop acting like 16 year old girls hoping the more successful, prettier, Prom Queen falls on her face.
ReplyDeletePlus, half of your dissenters wouldn't even be here if TMI or QotD hadn't been spammed with this URL.
Talk about unethical.
Julia is on a roll today!
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 11:15: TMI or QotD wouldn't have been spammed with this URL (by whomever did it, I don't believe the moderators of this site did) IF the "more successful, prettier, Prom Queen" hadn't deleted everything (but praise) that people where trying to write there. Their own site says "talk amongst yourselves". Ya, right.
ReplyDeleteOver and over again on TMI they say we are interested in what you have to say (without adding the disclaimer, but we'll delete it if it isn't flattering).
I don't think it has anything to do with ethics. It has much more to do with people having something to say and not having an organized forum in which to do it. Which RBNS now is (after the initial shut-down by Tumblr on one of the earliers Karp Kleanses).
"Anon" @ 11:15 - a.k.a., JaBa, you are not more successful, more attractive or in any way superior to many (if not all) of us here.
ReplyDeleteAnd shame on your parents for enabling your mental illness(es) and not getting you the help you need, while still financing your weird face-altering surgeries and injections, fake hair, insipid costumes, tranny makeup, cycles of nonstop cupcakes then cleanses.
Plus JA has thrust--operative verb, there--her cupcakes onto the stage so blatantly that it is a bit disingenuous to expect people to single said cupcakes out ONLY for praise and admiration. That aint' the way it works, duckie. You make a claim on the public stage--sometimes it's a standing ovation, sometimes hurled tomatoes.
ReplyDeleteAnd sometimes, the audience just yawns or falls asleep.
Oh but you all, Julia and Mary are SO LUCKY!!! They get to sit front row at fashion week and get free juice cleanses and their "work" includes taking endless photos of themselves posing at various events. LUCKY, LUCKY, LUCKY!
ReplyDeleteENVY THEM!!!
Never mind that one of them is homeless, two of them rely on botox to appear under age 45(even though they're still under age 30), none of them have meaningful romantic relationships or careers and that they're the laughing stock of most Manhattan media outlets and the rest of us who post here with IQ's that are bigger than our breast sizes.
WE'RE JUST MEAN GIRLS!!!
We're jealous because she's "more successful and prettier" and we're not, wow!
Gosh, I'm so glad someone cleared that up for me. And here I thought I was just annoyed by the sheer existence of a laughable place like Nonsociety that promotes the idea of spoiled and egotistical young American women acting like teenage idiots.
Yep, I guess I'm just jealous, you guys.
10:34 it really isn't for you to understand. Different people have different buttons and they'll respond accordingly. I get where you're coming from, but the reality is not everyone is going to harp on the non-physical.
ReplyDeleteAlso "more successful, prettier, Prom Queen". Is that how you see her? It isn't how I do. I'm not impressed by people who trample over others on the way to the top, not all that swayed by those whose looks (which will fade) are all they have to offer this world. Your interpretations of the community and people here seem to be based entirely on your own POV, which is fine, but you can't apply them so generally. You're asking people to stop doing here what Julia herself does in public view to other women, even her own so-called friends. Most people don't resent that she's "successful" (if you'd call it that), but that she does absolutely nothing of worth with that 'success'. The image-friendly charitable endeavors aren't changing that perception, either. So if you have a voice and a platform, and use it to promote yourself and seemingly nothing else we're now supposed to pat you on the back? Hmmmm.. no.
If you think anyone could and should be envious of Julia, can we deduct that you would find Paris Hilton an equally worthwhile individual undeserving of critique? Don't worry, it's rhetorical.
ReplyDeleteOn what planet is Julia Allison "prettier and more successful" than the rest of us here? Just because some of us don't splash pics of ourselves all over the net doesn't mean that we're any less pretty or successful than Her Magesty Princess Pink CupcakeKrazy.
ReplyDeleteJA's paltry "success" is fading as fast as what's left of her once youthful good looks.
And if "success" is defined as hitting on rich married men, gaining notoriety for being a fame-hungry raging biyotch, getting random folks to read my blog, get a few magazine stories about my pathetic claims to fame, being an overpaid television personality for a year until I get fired for being "unprofessional", and writing boring and fluffy columns about my sad excuse of a love life, then I think I'll pass on any shred of such pitiful "success" in my own life, thank you very much.
To Mary's mom or whoever is posting above: if the three dopes had any internet sense, they would have created a forum on their site.
ReplyDeleteThen they'd have the forum page views to pad stats in their futile attempts at selling advertising. And they would have had a shot at influencing the tone, the content, and more importantly the Google indexing.
But they lost their chance when Ms. Journalist decided to go all censorial. Hope she enjoys the results as much as you do.
Frankly, I see nothing wrong with a little bitching and moaning for lulz on a dopey blogspot site. But an anonymous person lecturing pseudonymous folks on tone? Now that's time wasted. I suggest you spend the time pondering the mistakes you made raising your daughter instead.
THANK YOU, redacted!!!
ReplyDeleteNS could've been extremely successful were it not for the fact that JA is so up her own ass with her frightening sense of ego that she refuses to allow commenting unless its of the praising variety.
A forum would've raised both their profiles and page views. They're too stupid to realize that, of course.
I'm willing to bet NS had THE most pageviews when a bunch of people stormed QotD with funny comments. At least it wasn't the boring ghost town it is now.
So way to go, ladies.
Your egotistical ways got in the way of your business savvy. Go home and cry to your daddies and leave the internet businesses and "f*ck you money" to your far smarter, richer ex'es.
Hoping? The downward spiral started long ago, without ANY help from people on this site, sorry. It'll be interesting though to see the "successful, pretty prom queen" come to terms with the reality that is aging and shrinking relevancy. That is, when the younger and prettier come along and she has to suck up being pushed aside. Then, when she's creeping on 35, 40+ and remains the same person she's always been (except now with that added precious stigma of older age that will expose her behavior in an entirely different light) you can try that argument again. She'll make a hell of a cougar, that's for sure.
ReplyDeleteProm Queen Pollyanna Troll: ZZZZZZZZZ. It's been discussed a million times before. Stop being so lazy and read some old posts.
ReplyDeleteI think Pollyanna is lovepuppy, which makes me sad. I don't understand why she's associating with JA. She's so much better than her.
ReplyDeleteI found out why JA left IU..given past trends of JA guess why?
ReplyDeleteDetails soon bunnies..
Plagiarism? LOL.
ReplyDeleteOK, I have a question. If she gets so freaked out and upset about dissenting voices on the net, how on earth would she be able to handle what could come from actual legit celebrity or a reality show? Reality TV is MADE to entice and typically edited to makes people look worse than they are for ratings. So, if she's as much of a character now but apparently didn't warrant the interest of a show following her life (which kind of speaks for itself) she would look like a nightmare post-editing. She already spends so much time trying to correct perceptions of her, so uh, wouldn't that just make it worse? Not to mention the possibility of the number of people that dislike her growing by the thousandfold. Although, I got the impression from Gawker articles following the Bravo thing that she just was a nightmare in general, which is why many companies have passed on working with her. I just find it so... crazy that she would ultimately pursue fame, celebrity and money to the absolute detriment of her health and actual (not transparently broadcasted) happiness.
I'm not anon 1115. Who calls someone a troll? Are you for real?
ReplyDeleteAlthough- I just reread 1115 post- I would agree spamming is unethical. Didn't people give That Girl Allison SO MUCH SHIT about that a few weeks ago?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll
ReplyDeleteLearn it, live it, love it.
JA(JAB) articles from IU student newspaper date 1999..
ReplyDeletedo you think JA is lying about her age?
Wow. And who is it that demeans women and gives them a bad image?
ReplyDeleteRight.
Rock on, Anon 1242.
I was telling you what a troll was. I think you need to relax before jumping to conclusions and chill out because it was a joke.
ReplyDeleteBut to answer your question? NonSociety does, and on the regular in case you hadn't noticed. Thanks for playing.
I believe Julia graduated from New Trier Township High School in Winnetka, IL in 1999 so she could have been a freshman at Indiana in fall 99 and writing for the paper then. That also makes her 28, so I don't think she's resorted to lying about her age... yet.
ReplyDeleteSigh. Posted this elsewhere, and it's long, but since the looks discussion comes up agaaaaain. Cross-posting.
ReplyDelete***
See, it wouldn't be a problem AT ALL if there WERE no business to speak of, or even if this was a non-profit experiment touted as such, with no expectation of benefiting financially down the line, and if all of it wasn't under the pretense of "empowering women". Their "goals" simply do not correspond with their accompanying behaviors and attitudes, so the inauthenticity is disturbing when it isn't simply irritating. When people defend them as being just like you or me in their fallibility, I DON'T disagree, nor do I begrude them that. I do take issue, however, with their purporting to be "human" while presenting to the world anything BUT that reality 99% of the time. That 1% only comes out when under fire, seeking undeserved sympathy and/or playing the pseudo self-deprecation to the hilt. It's like even the humanity we're permitted to see (and shouldn't that be all of it? Isn't this lifecasting?) is false, orchestrated for skewing public opinion in their favor (and ultimately for their gain) rather than any real consideration for or response to what people are feeling and how they're reacting. It isn't so much Meghan with any of these things, as I find her to be the most genuine of them all, if a little misguided. She's self-deprecating at times, but you get the impression it's rooted in lower self-esteem (from wanting to be something other than a pretty-faced heiress) than playing it up - while not actually believing what's being stated - for sympathy or to fake identifying with others.
In hoping to become a leader or have people essentially pay you for a product/service, you have no choice but to take on the responsibility and accountability that comes with it! When you try to blame others for your failure to do so or ignore the problem by attempting to shift the focus to the "motives" behind the response of the audience, it only serves to underscore the point being made and exacerbate the problem. The audience is patient for some time, but having been ignored they eventually get resentful. So even if they at some point get their stuff together and start putting out things of quality, their audience will have been soured from their inattentiveness at the beginning. The person behind the content has become unlikeable and dismissable, and so it becomes harder to look objectively on whatever it is they produce.
I thought she said everywhere that she's 27?
ReplyDeleteThat would make her 29 not 28 folks her BD is in Feb folks..
ReplyDeleteWhy does that not surprise us Bunnies?
Curiosity took over and I want to the TONY Matchmaker article where I believe she'd corrected an earlier comment by saying she was 27. That comment has since been deleted, but I hadn't seen these two gems:
ReplyDeleteTina
Wed, Feb 11, at 10:19am
Poor Dr. James. Julia: "I immediately text him and reassure him that I’d love to see him again." Then, check out her twitter dissing the guy (during the date, of course) but over and over again since he's been back in contact. "Why is he sending me facebook messages? Omg, he's added me to his litserv." Classic CT. Wants the attention but when she gets it, "ew".
Flag as inappropriate
Samantha
Tue, Feb 10, at 09:09am
Julia, with all due respect, I read your full length article and it was nothing to "come back for." It was no more interesting than this shortened article and gave me, the reader, no more useful information as this one. You cannot make the story all about yourself - any writer worth her salt knows that. Also, you are just not that interesting. I am not really sure why Time Out continues to employ you... your articles are about as tasty and unsatisfying as a stale cupcake.
One thing I don't really seem to understand about these girls is that they don't seem to actually do the typical 20-something activities that most folks that age do.
ReplyDeleteI realize their motto is "live differently", but they really don't seem to take much pleasure in the normal things a Manhattan gal would typically enjoy and therefore "lifecast" about.
Do they ever go clubbing? Or simply go bar-hopping at random little joints just to get our of their apartments??
I have as of yet to see any of them go to a concert at MSG or somewhere, even though every tour out there plays in NYC...don't they listen to any mainstream music or performers??
Where do they do their grocery shopping?
Do they see movies regularly? Ever hit the library??
I know Julia made a HUGE DEAL out of reading a book at a bookstore coffee shop and seeing a recent flick with some friends, when most of us do that every other week or so.
Just something I wonder about with those three.
They're not relatable at all.
I think the age thing is part of her rushing into doing things with apparently no thought or planning. Maybe she's getting worried about "running out of time". Remember she was talking in that Big Think video about their being few young female entrepreneurs? Well, first, that's a lie as there are many women much younger than her that have built successful, revenue-producing businesses. Second, I feel like she wants to be able to say she did this/accomplished something/revolutionized whatever at "20-something" because it won't be as impressive (at least to her and her acquaintances) if she gets it at say, 40.
ReplyDeleteThey don't engage in normal social activities because they're too busy chasing their dream of "fame" and they don't seem to actually have any good friends other than each other. Julia's so out of touch, she blogs about when she reads a book and made it an event worth mentioning on her social calendar that she was seeing the AMC Oscar movie marathon and watching the Oscars. These are probably normal events for most people, but Julia's not normal. And Mary has blogged before about how she doesn't enjoy pop culture, so I don't think she gets out much either. It's weird really. Most people keep up with movies, books or current events and have the ability to at least make small talk about it at parties and gatherings. But I get the idea these women don't get invited a lot of places and when they do, they resort to talking / drawing attention to themselves because they don't have anything else to say. Yeah - social outcasts / misfits who not relatable at all.
ReplyDeleteWell 1:02, I don't know that they're even trying to be relatable. Any earlier comment on a post awhile ago pointed out that they're constantly posturing and trying to live "fabulous lives". Fabulous lives as illustrated by movies, tv shows and mainstream media, though. So maybe to be shown doing many "normal things" would be a grounding they aren't prepared to accept. It would make them feel common, you know? Not special. The broadcasting of the fabulous life devoid of anything "normal people" might do was all they were doing in the beginning before they started getting called out on it. Then and only then do you start to see, "fine, we were loaned these dresses, we didn't really buy them", and that's why I kind of wasn't shocked at all by their reaction to Charlsie's eye-opening blog. She laid out the reality for all to see, to an extent that was terribly uncomfortable for them.
ReplyDeleteRE: The TONY article.
ReplyDeleteThat IS strange. A woman writes: "Why would a woman in her 30s refer to potential dates as "boys" ?" And Julia did definitely reply to it with actually I'm 27 (or 28) whatever she said, can't remember. But that comment is now gone. However, her other comment about the photoshoot is still here. Very odd.
weird. Meg's page doesn't work today - some sort of erro when connecting. Hmmm.
ReplyDeleteAlso, did anyone else notice that the Alexa graphs look different today? Earlie rin the week, alexa showed a steep increase in page views during th elast month for NS. Now they show a decrease. No snark: I really wonder why...
Without a doubt, I can tell you that the decline isn't because their content is getting any better or worse, it's because people are fed up with their ridiculous interface.
ReplyDeleteNobody wants to scroll horizontally and then click to read something they're already reading. That bullshit is annoying enough at Gawker and at least then they don't try to throw me into a lightbox with animated expanding sides.
My favorite was Julia's explanation of how time is horizontal so their interface should be too. Julia, if you want to mimic the passing of time, your new posts should be on the right side of the screen instead of the left.
But nobody would do that, because that would be retarded.
And what's up with lifecasting themselves at doctor's appointments or photographing their feet and nails when they get mani/pedi's?
ReplyDeleteI'm just waiting to see Julia start lifecasting her next gyno visit. Or maybe even start photographing herself in the bathroom, counting how many dingleberries she can find in her own poop.
A new baugher! My excitement is unbounded.
ReplyDeletehttp://baugher.tumblr.com/
Not gonna lie, my heart just skipped a beat at reading that last comment. LOVE BAUGHER (er, the reblogger, not the real one).. off to read now. :D
ReplyDelete"It also inspired me to post more.."
ReplyDeleteWow, never thought I'd say this. THANKS JA! :)
Reblogger Baugher has inspired me to actually work at my job. I want to be able to relax and enjoy this new post in all it's resplendency so I'm actually getting productive. Nice.
ReplyDeleteThe new interface is fine if you use a MAC...my PC at work is AWFUL with it.
ReplyDeleteI can see it now, Anon1:27, complete with massive accompanying photo-
ReplyDelete"Just finished pooping a massive turd, bunnies. It's all mushy and green from that plate of cupcakes I ate. Just WOW. Even Lilly's farts Don't. Smell. This. Bad. Blerg."
I'm just the opposite -- I use a PC at home and a Mac at work, and they're both terrible for me. I think the thing that irritates me most is the Mac mouse's inability to scroll horizontally along with their posts.
ReplyDeleteI also use an iPhone. Their site KIND of works if you're surfing vertically, but doesn't work at all when you're holding the phone horizontally.
The fail, she is epic.
ok, i will stand up for her on the age thing: i also graduated in 99 and i'll be 28 this year as well. although she looks WAAAAY older than me, but that's beside the point.
ReplyDeletespeaking of mean girls, there's a little quote in this observer article that is a total burn:
http://www.observer.com/2009/o2/fashion/tents-amy-astley-contemplates-unlikely-fashion-week-land-grab-philip-lims-non-80s-ro
"Curiously, several seats down from the Vogue contingent, dating columnist and Internet personality Julia Allison sat in a pink frilly top with pink lipstick, typing into her pink PDA and looking like she was about to burst into tears. (At one point she exchanged words with one of the women working the floor in headsets; perhaps they needed her front-row seat? Hey, we’re just guessing.)"
You assume that JA started from kindergarten on same year as everyone ..no she started one year earlier..
ReplyDeleteAnon 146: do you have one of the macbooks? The trackpad allows pretty easy horizontal scrolling if you drag from the right corner. I don't use a mouse except for on my PC.
ReplyDeleteAnon 1:51 - My son was born in late February also so he had to start school a year late (which makes him sort of a year behind), i.e. he was already 5-1/2. Not sure how it works out but I honestly don't think she's ever lied about her age. Too easy to verify.
ReplyDeleteOff topic. I find this picture kinda sad. Both girls smiling yet not a crease in their face.
http://julia.nonsociety.com/post/79850072-0-0
(Julia did say she'd use Botox when the time came; guess it arrived.) It looks like the swelling from her lip injections have mostly subsided but still. Two lovely girls (I mean looks-wise) and they both have that "done" look. It's a shame and I'm just hoping they are setting a good example to their fan girls of what NOT to do.
Anon 1:59: Nope, it's a MacPro with one of these mice:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.apple.com/mightymouse/
Ideally the little ball should scroll across if I want it to... alas, it does not.
Noooope.. caving to society and media pressure to stay youthful (because getting old is just so ickyyy you knooow), that's living differently folks! Oy.
ReplyDeleteAlso, she was NOT about to burst into tears, OK?! Because she is HAPPY. SHE IS BLESSED. SHE IS THE HAPPIEST PERSON THAT EVER LIVED, DO YOU HEAR HER!!!! HAPPY! HAP.. ha.. *hyperventilates and passes out*
juliasmellz.com: even more of a burn, that Observer article declines to bold her name...
ReplyDeleteAnon @ 2:03: What I find sad in that post to which you linked is that the putative writer doesn't realize that there is no such word as "undisputably."
ReplyDeleteI love their gleeful disdain!
ReplyDeleteThe Observer says Julia Allison was about to burst into tears at Philip Lim. That show was going on around the same time she was twittering over and over again about how she was SOOOO HAPPPEEEE!!!! and BLESSSSED!!! as the Tumblr fiasco blew up in her face.
ReplyDeleteMeghan finally updated her Twitter! Her new friend is a correspondent for The CBS Early Show. She's networking and hasn't posted anything on the NS site since last night.
ReplyDeleteShe's ready move on, I am willing to bet, and I am proud of her and will root for her in all her future endeavors.
Julia's been strangely silent today. Do you think her parents are holding an intervention?
ReplyDeleteAlthough she really needs to learn how to interview. She'd be great on G4 or something if she learned how to command herself on camera.
ReplyDeleteWhere is this Observer post? Can someone link to it?
ReplyDeleteMeghan seriously needs to do herself a favor and get the Hell out of this NS mess already, with whatever is left of her dignity.
ReplyDeleteMary may have grown by leaps and bounds throughout this past year, but Meghan at least seems to still have a decent reputation, a solid working history, and is the best-looking girl in that trio. From all accounts, she also seems to be the most professional/personable of those three.
She still has a chance to break free and use her connections to do her own thing professionally. If she has half a brain, she'd at least put together a good audition reel already, polish up her interviewing/onscreen skills and start submitting herself as a regular TV hostess/tech personality of some sort.
Mary may be capable of leaving the fray as well, but Meghan has the most potential out of all of them at this point. Plus, the sooner they get away from that washed-up joke Julia Allison, the better.
Run, Meghan, RUN!!!
For fuck's sake, can people stop comparing Julia to Paris Hilton? PARIS > JULIA. PERIOD. Paris is actually a businesswoman, who you know, does things. She has a shoe line. She actually had a reality show (unlike Julia who only aspires to star in one). She designed handbags for a Japanese company. Whatever. She's much, much more accomplished than Julia. And when Paris Hilton trumps you -- DAMN, you have to be a total ASS.
ReplyDeleteYou forget Gabor probably had something to do with it..at least the business skills
ReplyDeleteParis is accomplished while being anti-semetic and racist. It's a winning combination, really.
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I love Julia's hourglass-shaped figure, but the high-waisted, blousy pants looks does. not. work. for. her.
ReplyDeleteThis is a look that could only be pulled off my tall, rail-thin people with no curves (someone like Meghan or Mary would look ok in these pants, for example). But Julia is average in both height and size and therefor she would does not look good.
SERIOUSLY JULES: We are not saying this because we are mean and "jealous." We are saying this because you look TERRIBLE in these pants. Remember the Jessica Simpson pants that everyone called her fat in? THOSE ARE THE PANTS YOU ARE WEARING.
What is the deal with the cowboy stance? I have never seen a woman that stands with their legs so exaggeratedly splayed out? It is so unfeminine and unattractive.
ReplyDeleteAnony 7:56
ReplyDeleteThe cowboy stance is an attempt to minimize the appearance of her bow legs.
Dear Jules,
ReplyDeletePlease do a comedy video, you 3 girls are good at it..
The comedy premise:
A Sex-less, Date-less Dating Columnist, a failed style snob and a consumer gadget girl make believing she is tech journalist have this idea for a start up.
Oh wait we already have one of those comedies..cary on
Speaking as someone with a killer pair of bow legs, I find Julia's evident shame about her gams HI-larious, and I enjoy mocking her for them.
ReplyDeleteWell Julia is sort of taking my advice - she just posted pics of herself embarrassingly taking self portraits at MoMA: http://julia.nonsociety.com/post/80076896-0-5
ReplyDelete(BunnyBingo said...Dear Julia, since you obviously read this site I just have to bust out some advice for you...Try wearing jeans and a sweatshirt and just get out there amongst real life for a change! Get on a train and go to the Cloisters or visit MoMA or something! Try taking photos of other people/things for a change. You live in New York City and have the world at your fingertips...February 18, 2009 5:15 PM )
Julia taking pictures OF HERSELF at the MOMA is the epitome of FUCKING LOSER. It did not think it possible to dislike her more.
ReplyDeleteAnd she goes and does it! WOW.
Dahling is quite correct. Paris Hilton gets paid by designers to sit in the front row at Fashion Week (although this year her price has come down considerably.) Jankles gets paid by TONY to kiss the asses of people who get paid by designers.
ReplyDeleteD-listers are warming the front-row seats where A-listers used to preen, McDonald's swill has replaced Starbucks, and goody bags are filled with K-Y Jelly instead of NARS cosmetics.
It's Fashion Week - the recession version.
"New York Fashion Week isn't what it used to be," one industry insider moaned.
http://snipurl.com/ccd2v
Sigh. Christian threw out "fierce" for "ferosh" eons ago, poor child.
ReplyDeleteAlso, Tori Spelling wasn't nice to her at this same show! :( I wonder if it had something to do with it coming to light that her Chelsea Handler appearance wherea she said she read her book on the plane ride over clashed a bit with her twitter revealing she'd actually slept the entire time. Oooops. Then again, that would assume TorTor knew or cared who she was.. doubt it.