Oh, poofy, who are these peoples you say you hob the nob with in the tents? (I spend time in tents with my Uncle Pavlik when I am little girl and Mother takes me to the village doctor later to discuss the bad touch. Is this same thing with you?)
Anyways, you scribble with your sausage fingers:
Front row at Charlotte Ronson.Anyone know who the girl in the pale pink stocking and giant glasses clinging to Mark Ronson (sitting next to mom Ann Dexter-Jones) is?
I not know much about the famous and rich, but I not know what the hell you talk about.
Update: The new site design hurts the eyeballs in my head. STOP THAT, POOFY!
Is that really Mark Ronson? He looks...different. He used to be cuter.
ReplyDeleteAlso, Russian Girl, you are THE BEST
ReplyDeleteYeeeeeeeeehawwww!!
ReplyDeleteMethinks Julia is threatened by this girl who shows no boob, wears knee-socks, glasses, flat hair and minimal makeup yet gets to be front row.
ReplyDeleteDear Julia, pink socks is "Tennessee Thomas", which took me all of 30 seconds to find out...
ReplyDeleteJust read the Fug girls' posts on BCBG and Ronson shows at the Cut blog (nymag). They actually provide their own viewpoints and content to the reader, versus crowdsourcing everything. Jules, you're doing it so, so wrong.
ReplyDeleteTennessee Jane Bunny Thomas -- she's a bunny!!
ReplyDeleteMark looks better in this shot, anony 10:54:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.zimbio.com/pictures/68iMbHnPIO-/Charlotte+Ronson+Front+Row+Fall+09+MBFW/5IQHS2567zz/Mark+Ronson
Russian girl, you have made me screech with laughter so I am scaring dogs.
ReplyDeletei dont want to go see the new design, how bad is it?
ReplyDeleteI spy Joy Bryant. No, Jankles, I'm not gonna tell you which one is her.
ReplyDeleteLionella: It makes your head hurt and your eyes bleed. It is absolutely brutal. And as Dyseptic points out, it's rejigged so that you have to click on every item to read them in their entirety, so it's designed to get more page views. No thanks, ladies, because I'll GO BLIND!
ReplyDeletePink Socks looks geek chic. She probably attracts more interesting men than the one who dresses like a stand-in on the set of Hush, Hush Sweet Charlotte.
ReplyDeleteJackles at 60, pink dress, pigtails, tranny makeup and all:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.eriegaynews.com/news/article.php?recordid=200607hushup
Reader-friendly sites do not make the view click through after two words of text. Even the credulous bunny-girls and cupcakettes are liable to end up feeling manipulated. That is all.
ReplyDeleteum....er....oops that would be "make the viewer click through."
ReplyDeleteHate the design, what is the reason for making the viewer click through?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 12:34: It adds another page view every time you click through, so it bumps up their flagging site statistics and makes them look more successful. Yucko.
ReplyDeleteDyspeptic
ReplyDeleteYeah, I was afraid of that. Thanks. Thanks RBNS for doing the nasty.
It's horrendous anyway, is this how she keeps the 13 year olds and deters haters?
Review of the "new design" by a real webdesigner!
ReplyDeleteThe new design is ridiculous. The explainations behind their awful design is even worse. Julia actually thinks they are being new and innovative by forcing a horizontal scroll through tiny content? She is preparing for the future of technology when all of our computers will be like an iPhone yet this technology doesn't exist for computers for the general public. So that has made their website mostly inaccessible.
1. Horizontal scrolling is not revolutionary made possible for the first time by Nonsociety.
2. Horizontal scrolling is unconvential and therefore will deter many viewers. Calling it a new found plan for the future of technology that we have yet to see, makes your website unviewable by the people of today. How is that a good plan?
3. As with the last version, how one reads this so called content...isn't ideal. You have to scan across then down. Now you have to scan across, down, open another window and continue to scroll down just to read anything. I would have left the sign at scanning across.
4. The content is too small. Not that it's worthy of huge screen-estate, but as any good web designer knows, if you can't read it because it's too small...what's the point of even having it?
Successful websites don't reach so far into new heights that the majority of your viewers can't appreciate or view the content easily. It is never about how revoluntionary your website is...it's about the content. We go to the web for content, not pretty unusable websites. This is a joke, and all the web designers out there will take this so called "revolutionary design" and learn what NOT to do from it.
Thank thank thank thank GOD this place exists. You all deserve a medal.
ReplyDelete@Web Review:
ReplyDeleteI'm also pretty sure the site is not accessible to people with disabilities. Nice "Fuck You blind people" from the trifecta of selfishness.
The site usability for the browsers for the disabled is zero.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the whole overall design restructure, remember Jankles was quoting bullshit statistics about pageviews using the Tumblr followers as well as the double entry pageviews of the Tumblr frames plus blog posts. Now effectively they may have tripled that number with the amount of forced clicks.
But, remember, the majority of the numbers still come from the sheep on Tumblr who have them on their follow lists. So the advertisements won't show in the dashboards, and subsequently they won't make their pennies per display.
On the note of the Google ads, I ran a blog with Google ad placements and unless you have significant traffic, and significant traffic should really be about 250,000 page view per month, those royalties are pretty slim. Not enough to disperse to Hello Kitty, DUM DUM, Jankles and their "staff".
Oh wait, Hello Kitty Meghan Asha Parikh doesn't need this money, she has daddy's trust fund. DUM DUM Rambin gets a stipend from the Texas Oil divorced dadddy, and I believe that Daddy Baugher (not Mom, she doesn't talk to her daughter) is footing some of this craptastic bill.
Is it possible to reblog (as a team) the tumblr followers to the site; and humiliate them enough to not follow? Just a thought.
ReplyDelete