As RBNS noted yesterday, it seems this blog has some sway over Jackles. After reading for days how even Rambin is managing to make her frenemy look bad by actually steadily producing content, albeit equally lame content, JA was suddenly blogging well into the wee hours of the morning today, violating yet again another New Year's Resolution. (Remember that ridiculous opus, by the way? The last time she called Mary a bitch? It'll be fun to run down them in a few months and look at how many she has broken and/or totally ignored. I wonder how that screenplay's coming along?)
However, trust us: This radio interview, contrary to Jackles's assurances, is definitely NOT worth even 30 seconds of your time.
A more alarming development is the near-daily habit Jackles seems to be developing of Twitter-stalking Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher. A little birdy tells us the Hollywood couple has been warned about the crazy girl in Manhattan who thinks she's a celebrity -- the same poor fool who blogged last night that it was her intention to track down Jennifer Aniston and get a hug from her, and then put that in her bio.
Julia is blogging like she did before she quit the internet, because it was "ruining her life." In-ter-est-ting.
ReplyDeleteWhen did she quit the internet?
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't even call it blogging. Basically it's just harping on other people. She's taking shots at ScarJo because she looks fantastic from behind (unlike our poofy one) and calls her a homewrecker. IT WAS A MOVIE, JULIA! But she lurrrves her some Zooey Deschanel, because she's non-threatening and quirky (i.e. Julia thinks she's prettier than her, HA!)
ReplyDeleteBecause Valleywag/Gawker snooped her budding "relationship" with Kevin Rose, and he bailed. She then continued to harbor this crush for a year, and now plans on making her attack during her ill-timed bicoastal birthday party.
ReplyDeleteAfter that whole Mac Air book scandal last year -- she demanded Jakob Lodwick buy her one after they'd broken up and after she outed his mental health issues on Gawker -- she stopped blogging for a month because "the Internet" was ruining her life.
ReplyDeleteYes, the Internet -- not JA herself.
But it only lasted a month or so.
After the JAcob Lodwick stuff came out and she started getting huge amounts of criticisms for being, oh I don't know, a huge bitch, she cried that she was quitting the internet cause it was ruining her life!
ReplyDeleteShe was back to blogging within 2 days.
I'll be at Fashion Week and will report back if I see these hags.
ReplyDeleteJulia is creating more "content" if you count posting twitters, pictures of packaged fish and manicures as "content." They are all lazy, lazy, lazy and I am on no "team" - all three of them suck hard.
ReplyDeleteBut keep blaming the Internet for ruining your life Jackles - not your own actions. Blame everything and everyone but yourself. It's worked so well for you in the past.
Wow, she is really rude and patronizing to Mark. Get over his age, woman. Goddamn.
ReplyDeleteWho's Mark?
ReplyDeleteThe guy who interviewed her on his radio show.
ReplyDeleteWait, Julia Allison is posting pictures of packaged fish?
ReplyDeleteMean Girl
ReplyDeleteJackles will never take responsibility for her actions. Someone or something else will always be blamed. And if she's backed herself into a corner, out comes the rape story or the bulimia story or any number of specious claims to solicit sympathy, with our lady of crashed conferences hoping that everyone will have forgotten why she came up with the sympathy plea in the first place.
The reblogging--yes, it's a blog, nothing special, no earth shattering "lifecast"--of an inane entry about hugging Jennifer Aniston being as wonderful as cupcakes and kittens, Jackle's insistence that this was THE. BEST. BIO. LINE. EVER., might be the most pathetic thing I read in all of 2009. How old is Julia Allison Button, the girl who grew backwards? 12? About ready to get a Rachel hair don't? Jesus!
--Jean Brodie
I've heard Mark's show before...he's good. The stuff with Allison was just tame.
ReplyDeleteYeah, Mark wasn't the problem in that interview. She was. When I wrote it wasn't worth even 30 seconds of your time, I meant because of her, not him.
ReplyDelete