Tuesday, February 3, 2009

It's like NS Mad Libs.

Hi bunnies!

Guess what!? [Redacted] just emailed us that [redacted] is [redacting] [redacted] all. the. time. [Redacted] won't be able to give us more details until [redacted], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [redacted] [redacted] [redacted], we'll [redacted].

[Redacted], bunnies!

112 comments:

  1. I don't get it. Care to give more details?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi bunnies!

    Guess what!? [Julia Allison] just emailed us that [Bravo] is [reading] [Reblogging Nonsociety] all. the. time. [Bravo] won't be able to give us more details until [they cancel her options and close the door for good], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [Mary's] [hair] [grows out], we'll [try again].

    [Redacted], bunnies!

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is a one-minute video where Mary discusses her hair options. I just threw up in my mouth.

    Her voice is grating. Please stick to unflattering pictures.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow, I was getting a feeling that Mary was second guessing her "Katie" haircut but after suffering through that video (Please, don't watch. It's painful.) it's really apparent that she HATES her new haircut and has major regrets. She jokes on the video that she wants to wear sunglasses all the time, even in bed.

    It's comical how she chases after all these crazy beauty trends to hide her raging insecurities. I'd almost feel sorry for her if she wasn't such a stupid, offensive hag.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Does it involve Derek the new intern?
    LOL Which one of you is that? Is it a group thing? Let's all join in on the fun!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kasey, this is a fun game. Let's all take our best guesses. My guess:

    Hi bunnies!

    Guess what!? [Charles Forman] just emailed us that [Julia Allison] is [still] [purging] all. the. time. [Good ol' Charles] won't be able to give us more details until [his hip buddy/sometimes gay lover David Karp formally withdraws his funding from NonSociety], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [Karp] [dumps NonSociety] [and their little dogs, too], we'll [purge ourselves unto you].

    [Julia's failed attempt at being a role model for the great number of women in this country who face eating disorders is just a lie to generate page views], bunnies!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Guess what!? [Charlsie] just emailed us that [Mary] is [fucking] [drunk] all. the. time. [Charlsie] won't be able to give us more details until [St. Patrick's Day], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [Mary] [enters] [rehab], we'll [twitter].

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi bunnies!

    Guess what!? [Mary] just emailed us that [Julia] is [fucking] [married men] all. the. time. [Mary] won't be able to give us more details until [she quits the site], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [funding] [dries] [up], we'll [post about it].

    ReplyDelete
  9. Guess what!? [Bozo the Clown] just emailed us that [Julia Allison] is [stealing] [his makeup] all. the. time. [Bozo] won't be able to give us more details until [Meghan, Julia and Mary vacate his mirrored fun house of horrors], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [Bozo] [moves back into the fun house] [and gets his clown make up back], we'll [give you an update].

    ReplyDelete
  10. You know, it's pretty amusing to think that with all this talk about page views, this blog is probably getting a good amount of views from those three from NonSociety themselves.

    Also, they're probably more eager to come here and see what the new content and comments are than people are about their site.

    ReplyDelete
  11. LIFE ON BLAST!

    If you are tired of kisseyfaces and dishonest practices, webisodes that read like a commercial and offensive content… PLEASE CHECK OUT WHAT I’VE BEEN WORKING ON BEHIND THE SCENES! Let’s see what we can do about “Living Differently”, shall we? I have been critiquing NS since July, and I think it’s about time I put my money where my mouth is… Who better to offer up some competition? I REALLY HOPE YOU LOVE THIS LITTLE INTRO! There is a lot more coming !!!!!

    xoxo

    ReplyDelete
  12. ScaryMary: very kewl so far!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Awesome, Scary!! I can't wait to see what these interesting, career-driven, beautiful women give us. How refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A new blog featuring crazy Veronica from the Real World, back in the day? That sounds promising.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Haha wow, is that Veronica from Road Rules?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Veronica from Road Rules is our answer to Julia Baugher? It's a neat idea in theory Scary, but V. is as unlikeable as JAB.

    ReplyDelete
  17. SCARY!!! the design is so cute! i love it! can't wait to see more!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Ahaha veronica from RW?
    Thats the funniest thing I've ever heard of. Trying to get back in the public eye is she?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just as unlikeable sure, but she's better-looking and at least she owns her villainhood. That's respectable and entertaining.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Uh, Veronica capitalizes all her "V"s apparently, wherever they are in a word or sentence. Awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  21. 3:54 Ty--she looks like Emily Brill with that 'do in her "sunnies" (ugh--why can't she call them sunglasses or at least shades like the rest of the world?).

    ReplyDelete
  22. Great Scary-
    Thats the solution... more self obsessed vapid fame addicted girls.
    Are they supposed to cancel each other out or something?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Think I got it:

    Hi bunnies!

    Guess what!? [Jakob Lodwick] just emailed us that [Julia] is [desperately] [emailing him] all. the. time. [Jakob] won't be able to give us more details until [NS shuts down], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [Karp] [closes] [the site], we'll [post all the emails].

    [Happy commenting], bunnies!

    ReplyDelete
  24. ScaryMary - so your blog was all some sort of evil genius plan to juxtopose the drivel that is NonSociety with your new competing site?

    Very clever.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I get it: the TV is supposed to symbolize 'lifecasting'?

    Nice!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Actually no. I started reblogging Mary in July. After months of snark and criticism I started to think to myself why not take all this feedback I am dishing out and do something better? It's one thing to sit and critique something, but if that's all that comes out of it, what good is that? If you see something you don't like and you think you can do it better how about put your money where your mouth is and walk a mile in their shoes and really do it BETTER? "Differently." Trust me, had I been planning this since July there would be a full site up by now, not just a teaser.

    Why hate on me now, for doing more than sitting and pointing the finger, when no one was hating when it was all about snark?

    And no one is supposed to be the answer to JAB. Why think if anyone was, it would be Veronica, and not me or one of the other girls who haven't been revealed yet? Just some thoughts.

    I mean if you hate on me too, I get it. Just another brick in the wall and all that. But I'm more of a do-er than just a talker. And I'm hoping to learn from their mistakes. And we have a very different spin on the entire thing. Other than just being a group of friends who blog, there wont be much else in common.

    Maybe see what we do and give it a fair shot before slamming it without seeing content yet.

    Thanks, either way!

    xoxo
    Scary

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anyone notice how Mary said she has "been without an iphone or computer during the entire TMI shoot" but there are photos of her on Julia's blog typing away at a laptop on set?

    Someone get the screangrabs before they delete it!

    Especially you Scary!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Right, then. Are we supposed to want to hear Veronica's opinions because she sleeps around and backstabs people on camera instead of off? I don't care if she "owns her villianhood" or not. She seemed pretty proud of being depicted as a promiscuous, untrustworthy, nasty human being. How is she any different than Julia? They both spent their 20's barely working and going to lame parties. At least Julia had an actual job for some of that time. Veronica made her money off reality tv game shows.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Veronica is a WONDERFUL person and friend. She hasn't even said anything yet and you are hating her already? LOL That TOTALLY makes sense!

    At least we know what we are getting into! haha

    And um, Veronica is also not the ONLY girl or the ONLY perspective. Do you want something better or just something to throw stones at? Someone gets up to do more than complain and they get the same reaction...?

    Or maybe that's just a few of you? We'll see.

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  30. In addition to the rule about not dissing the girls looks, can we institute a "no self-promotion" rule? I don't know who Veronica is, I don't care who Veronica is. I didn't come here to talk about Veronica.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Wow Scary you don't like it when people dump all over your friend... how do you think Mary's friends feel when you dump on her. This is going to be funny.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I never heard of Veronica, but I love me some ScaryMary. Can't wait to see where her new venture leads. This feels like the 2009 "Yes, we can" attitude in action!

    ReplyDelete
  33. SCARY: you say finally someone is DOING something
    BUT
    We didn't want an alternative: we wanted it all to go away.
    ugh.

    ReplyDelete
  34. What 5:23 said. Submit a site or a post to RBNS and let them decide if they want to post it. If that sort of stuff starts were going to have a ton of people like that girl Alison from the QOTD coming here and pimping their blogs and signing their posts.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Unlike NonSociety we plan to be more than willing to hear feedback and comments but to call people who haven't really said anything yet "vapid and fame addicted" just because of the industries they work in is just not a valid criticism.

    Hi Julia.

    xoxo
    Scary

    ReplyDelete
  36. ScaryMary - My post was a question not so much as a complaint. I was curious as to which came first - the blog or your desire to be *somewhat* of a competitor to NS. Now we know!

    I'll hold out my opinion of your site until I see the content, just like I did with NonSociety.

    To the others here: I would recommend you give Scary the benefit of the doubt. She has been a great contributor to this site, as well as delivered some really insightful commentary on her blog. It has also become very apparent she has the industry insight and business acumen to potentially make her site more inclusive, compelling and markedly more empowering than NonSociety.

    Don't fail us, Scary! I look forward to seeing your final product.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I call a serial reality show contestant all of the above.
    And remember, if you put yourself out there, you're just asking for it, right?

    Annnndddd I'm not Julia.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Hi bunnies! Please try to reserve your comments about SM's site to another venue. SM, good luck with your venture!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Mona:

    THANK YOU SO MUCH!

    And really, if anyone has any ideas or suggestions or ANYTHING, feel free to email me! I'd love to hear it.

    xoxo
    Scary

    ReplyDelete
  40. I'm not Julia. I'm just someone who likes to stay on topic.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Mona 4:00 p.m.: BEST COMMENT EVER. Thank you. I had a long day at the office and needed that laugh.

    @ScaryMary 4:26p.m.: I LOVE IT. The design is so fun. I, for one, think this is cool that you saw something that was wrong and made a decision to act instead of just bitch. Your site seems to be all the things that could have been awesome about NS AND it has the added bonus of being run by a seemingly sensible person who might actually listen to feedback. Here's your first constructive bit: that music is driving me a little batty and it took me a good minute or so to find the off switch (maybe an option to turn it off that's a little clearer?). Also a single sentence about each of those causes would be useful.

    Scary, may I offer up my services as an editor/proof reader whenever you need it related to this new project? That's not snark or an implication that you need it, but a serious offer. I'm an editor by trade, and I am more than happy to help out however it would be useful to you. E-mail MelissaSue.RBNS@gmail.com if you're interested.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Anonymous 5:33: If you have an opinion about her that's fine, you are entitled. I met her long after MTV, I never really watch the RW/RR challenges. So I know a different girl. She can be confrontational but there is something to her, something behind it. I can be a loudmouth too! haha We are all made up of MANY facets. And we really DO want to bring something genuine to the table! I would appreciate if you didn't prejudge our venture, which is the work of a group of us not just one of us, before you at least see where we are trying to go with this!

    Thank you for the well wishes, NSRB... and the others who are sharing those regards...

    ReplyDelete
  43. Sorry RBNS bunnies! I was writing the response before your 5:33 ruling about saving your comments on the new venture.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Feel free to comment on the Tumblr or email me...

    Don't want to piss off NSRB, lol!

    I have too much love for the cause!

    xo

    ReplyDelete
  45. Love how Meghan is now shilling for Blueprint. This is like the theater of the absurd. I'm waiting for Edward Albee to roll out with a bottle of Blueprint and an elephant.

    ReplyDelete
  46. After reading this set of comments, I'm a little disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Hi bunnies!

    Guess what!? [Dan Loeb] just emailed us that [Julia Allison] is [telephoning his wife] [and hanging up] all. the. time. [Dan, the edgy hedgie] won't be able to give us more details until [he files a restraining order against Julia], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [his lawyer] [draws up] [the paperwork], we'll [be first in line to hear all the juicy details].

    [Stay nice], bunnies!

    ReplyDelete
  48. Guess what!? [Carrie, Blair and Victory from Lipstick Jungle] just emailed us that [Julia] is [copying their style] [and assuming she's them even when alone in her apt. at night] all. the. time. [Vistory] won't be able to give us more details until [her writers think of something], but don't worry your pretty little heads, once [Carrie] [Blair] [and Vic are given the right words], we'll [bring Julia to a safe place where nice white jackets are all the rage].

    [Keep believing], bunnies!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Oh yeah, we have a winner...

    Thanks dyspeptic

    ReplyDelete
  50. Was I too close? Because my guess got deleted!

    YEEHAW! I hit the jackpot!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Jacy-- We ALL hit the jackpot.

    ::eagerly awaits::

    ReplyDelete
  52. Hm. Mary (or someone) delted my comment from QotD, yet all of the other disgusting and hateful ones remain. Weird.

    Sorry for the re-post, but maybe you guys can figure out why it was deleted. Did it hit too close to home? I didn't say anything people who read Gawker didn't already know.


    Rae Smith

    Curious. My comment got deleted. Yet all of the other hateful ones stay?

    I guess saying that Briana is Mary or Leven Rambin hit a little too close to home? Or maybe it was mentioning the embarrassing fact that Leven used to famously post at Gawker under the pseudonym of BethCooper? And mentioning that their family is self-loathing, nouveau riche white trash whose mother's adopt avatar's with a designer handbag name in them? If you wanted to retain any amount of dignity, Rambins, you wouldn't have aimed for C-list celebrity by having sex with Julia's much older boyfriends (Leven) or starting embarrassing, revenue-less websites (Mary).

    Your parents should have known better than to have taught you that self-respect, class and an education come second to minor fame and looking passably pretty.

    ReplyDelete
  53. deleted comments, HERE? i thought this was a safe place where we could express ourselves without censorship. RBNS, please advise.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Anon@8:36: Rae's comment was deleted on NonSociety's Question of the Day page, not RBNS.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I am assuming it got deleted because it was too close to home, but it involved Charlsie, JA, JA's obsession with reading RBNS and the documentation Charlsie is waiting for JA to sign.

    Also, can we put down a "No Blog Pimping" rule here. I am sure many of us have blogs. But it seems uncouth to be coming onto the comments of another hard-working blogger's project to try to divert attention elsewhere.

    RBNS already has the site on its blog roll, no? That's enough, isn't it?

    STAY ON TOPIC PEOPLE!

    ReplyDelete
  56. I love ScaryMary and her tumblr, but agree with Jacy here, no "overt" pimping please.

    ReplyDelete
  57. It is nothing personal against SM, I just find it difficult to wade through so many off-topic comments. I have enough preoccupations online -- don't need more, and want to get right down to business here!

    ReplyDelete
  58. Warning - do not try reading QOTD at work - the hysterical laughter draws too much attention. My fave:

    "Mary Rambin":
    I want to address something very important right now. I can't do it on my blog because Julia will call David Karp, promise him a sloppy bj, and make him delete my Tumblr account without my consent.

    Firstly, I am not a homophobic. I just said that I looked like a "dyke" with my new, shorter haircut because short hair instantly means that a girl is a lesbian. Futhermore, I did not want to look like a lesbian because dykes are ugly and if you stand too close to them then you will catch their homosexuality. I respect female lesbians because they choose their sexuality, but I would never want to be mistaken for a lesbian. That would be the worst thing in the world.

    Furhtermore, even though I hang out with aging, boring gays, I don't like gay people that much either. I view their sexual choices as gross and sins. Everyone knows that. Unfortunately they are the only men who will tell me that my mannish, boxy figure is attractive and that my sad sack act of obsessing over an ex-boyfriend is "normal." I told you, these guys are like Z-list quality gays.

    Furthermore, Julia deleted her post where I say I negatively look like a dyke because 1. I didn't want people to know that I look like a lesbian and 2. I guess some dumb feminist dykes complained or whatever.

    Furthermore, I hope noone was affendhed by my post. I didn't expect Julia to post it, but I don't expect Julia to respect anyone's boundries. Oddly enough, she is denying our old intern course credit for her work with us because she kept a blog that mentioned that she worked for us and that Julia sometimes shows up late to tapings. Hm.

    Futhermore, I think I am done here.

    Thank you for listening. I hope you respect my honesty. It doesn't matter if you are an ignorant asshole, as long as you are "honest" about it that is all that matters.

    xo,
    Mary

    ReplyDelete
  59. More QOTD that must be shared:

    "Derek - Intern":
    Aw, now Mary is going to be in charge of the deletions! I'd watch out because she isn't a great "reader" everyone!

    Anyways, Mary, I got some calls back from the people in charge of fashion week and they said they can't get you into any shows because you are an "embarrassment to fashion journalism and those of us with any taste or style." Something like that. I also spoke to Crystal at your colonics place and she said that no, the sores on your ass are not from the colonic, they are probably a sign of some sort of STD! I laughed at that because everyone knows you don't have sex.

    They also said they can no longer allow you to say they give you colonics because you represent a poor body image for girls. :\

    Is there anything I should be doing with these warning emails from Google telling us to get rid of our hidden source tags?

    Oh, Leven's publicist called and wants you to delete all posts that involve Nin. She also said that she will sue you for defamation of character if you mention that you and Nin are related again. She seemed serious this time :(

    Also, I think Mason might be sick. I tried telling you this earlier but you kept calling him "handbag" and saying he "wasn't cute when he was sick."

    Thanks Mary! :)

    ReplyDelete
  60. I actually felt a teensy bit bad for Mary when she posted that text exchange with the guy she "dated." She wrote something about how "everybody" who saw them together said they made the greatest/cutest couple. From his response, it sounds like they were never really dating, just hanging out. Maybe they hooked up a few times. Then he realized she actually had feelings for him and cut her loose. We've all been there.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Hollie: I did too. And I kind of admired that when he said "Look, I just don't like you that way," she just immediately ended the conversation and shook it off.

    The girl is dumb as a fucking post, but she has more manners and more pride than her pathetic, stalk-y frenemy JA.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Pride went out the window when she drunk texted him trying to find out if he was still interested in dating her. And that multiple choice quiz (pre-emptive defensiveness) she gave him about his feelings...good grief. Stop guessing and simply ask. See how simply he answered? Guys just aren't that complicated.

    Ladies, THE TREASURE DOES NOT DO THE HUNTING.

    ReplyDelete
  63. But you know what? I respected the fact that she would blog that KNOWING she had so many people out there looking to criticize her.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I agree SomeGuy, but I am an old lady, and to me she's a young kid, and we've all been there. I felt for her a bit. She clearly really liked the guy, there was a dialogue, she just wanted an answer, he was a bit uncommunicative, so she pushed it a bit.

    That doesn't offend me nearly as much as the idiot who blogs and posts pictures and Twitters in a frighening manner about every guy who pays the slightest bit of attention to her.

    I wonder whatever happened to the ineffable Alexander Marquandt?

    ReplyDelete
  65. "I have about twelve (12!) crushes right now, and they're making me feel very alive!"--just posted on her twitter. I'd love to assume she downed two six-packs of Orange Crush and is on a delirious sugar-high, but it's the old MO--she showed her hand too soon with the one guy and now it's deflect and diffuse. God, it's just too easy now.

    ReplyDelete
  66. True, Mary's not stalky like Julia, but that text exchange made me cringe for her. There wasn't anything for her to say once he said that he didn't have romantic feelings for her.

    Some Guy is right - guys aren't that complicated. If they're interested, they'll let us know. For the most part, they're not "shy" or "conflicted" or really giving it much thought.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Jacy, maybe he really DID become truly ineffable!

    ReplyDelete
  68. Oh my God, Anon 9:58! That is fucking hilarious. She is so insane that it is actually side-splittingly funny now.

    "Uh-oh. I scared another guy off, but this one a gazillionaire, with my yoga poses and my crush Tweet and my private jet photos but goddammit, guys like the chase and I want to get into that penthouse and break up that marriage so I better Tweet right now that I have dozens and dozens of crushes!!!"

    My God, woman, get some help. Calling Mr. and Mrs. Baugher! Please come save your daughter from herself!

    ReplyDelete
  69. I'm such a dumbass...I tried to enter my email to scarymary's new site and clicked about 10 times before I realized it's not reallt up yet.

    scarymary, I'm gonna be all there!

    ReplyDelete
  70. Doesn't Scary have her own blog? Can't people write their shout outs and comments to her there? Please?

    ReplyDelete
  71. OMG. stop with the scary mary shit. I don't even want to align myself with her agenda. Her message is muddled by her own egoblogger aspirations.

    ReplyDelete
  72. My comment was directed at SM, fyi.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Come on people, focus! Twelve crushes! Let's look alive, very alive in here!

    ReplyDelete
  74. 12 crushes....

    I did yoga pauses, and twitted my crush, and took a his private plane BUT

    I have 12 crushes, NO JUST 1, 12! No, really.

    ReplyDelete
  75. JA's trying to divert us into figuring out who the 12 crushes are while she stealthily takes over the Interwebs.

    ReplyDelete
  76. I still think Time Out gave her the boot.

    ReplyDelete
  77. 12 crushes?! I thinks the Stalingrad streetwalker is falling for her johns. This will only end in misery (and a yeast infection).

    ReplyDelete
  78. Are we sure the crushes are other people? Maybe she just stumbled into a hall of mirrors.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I would be honored to be with a man who is fantasizing about pounding 11 other women while going down on me. Honored I tell ya.

    ReplyDelete
  80. If a fameball dies as a martyr, are there 12 crushes waiting in heaven?

    ReplyDelete
  81. Anon 10:38 -- that made me howl.

    Yes, people, FOCUS! Look alive indeed! TWELVE CRUSHES!

    Should we try to count them up? Certainly at least eight to 10 of them must be on herself.

    ReplyDelete
  82. I picture JA staring into her mirror and singing, "I got my eyes on you." Talking to herself, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  83. I agree that TONY probably fired JA, and don't even get me started on SM, Total Jing! Well said at 10:33.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Mei - If that is true, it explains the total verbal online blow jobs she's been giving to rich men over the last month. Who cares if you lose your job when a sugar daddy can pay your way?

    By the way RBNS, I would love - LOVE - if there was some sort of forum spinoff from this site where we can discuss topics other than NonSociety. It's very rare that a bunch of witty, intelligent women (and men!) are in one place and it's been truly refreshing. I hope this is an idea you'll sit on for the future.

    In the meantime, I'll keep my comments on topic. PURELY NonSociety right here.

    ReplyDelete
  85. I'm in agreement that TONY booted Julia. Or at the very least demoted her. That promotion about her going on twenty four dates in one day not only didn't happen but she never mentioned it again. That only happens when things fall through for her. I wonder if it has to do with all the comments on her last column that accused her of making that Textiquette column up.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Honestly guys... I posted the link one time. I have also asked people to either email me or comment on my own pages when I saw people using this area to do so. What more can I really do? It's not like I'm coming in here spamming the comments, and I've been actively commenting on here from the beginning, always being on topic except for this one link one time. And I will continue to actively comment here moving forward. Ease up.

    Now back to the topic at hand.

    xoxo

    ReplyDelete
  87. Folks, she did not get fired from TONY. We're pretty sure another column is coming out next week.

    Mona: Love the idea of another forum. We'll think about it.

    And Anon 9:58: Right on about the 12 crushes. Deflect, deflect, deflect, Jules.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Folks, she did not get fired from TONY. We're pretty sure another column is coming out next week.

    But the singles issue comes out this week. It would be very weird if she has nothing in it.

    ReplyDelete
  89. You guys are regular Meghan Ashas:

    http://www.timeout.com/newyork/articles/features/26342/just-be-yourselftm

    ReplyDelete
  90. No, I am. That's from last year. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I would definitely love a forum, as well. The comments here are so active and it's easy to miss when someone new comments on an older posting.

    As far as TONY goes, are Julia's columns online or is that just a NY thing? (I'm in Atlanta.)

    (Note to ScaryM)
    People are mainly complaining about fellow commenters not staying on topic. You are taking this stuff WAY too hard. If you do too much damage control on your new site, people will start to feel intimated about making comments.
    (End Note to ScaryM)

    ReplyDelete
  92. ^intimidated, derr

    ReplyDelete
  93. Jeez, I go out for a nice dinner and drinks in the central time zone; and I come back and Our Lady of the Pink Lightbulbs is twittering 12 crushes??!!!

    No way to make this stuff up, bunnies. No effing way. Just sit back and let it all unfold.

    ReplyDelete
  94. if she goes after 12 of them, there's a slight chance ONE out of the 12 is stupid enough and might not think she's completely terrible. slight chance, but at least a chance.

    ReplyDelete
  95. For bonus points

    Nominate the most inappropriate person for qud and advice box contributor:

    nominate@nonsociety.com

    I prefer dead people like the Julia tries to model namely Paris Hilton;s Grandmother :)

    Mase the dog and Marshmellow

    ReplyDelete
  96. Now Mary & Meghan have been kissing up to Demi & Ashton. God, what starfuckers.

    Standing next to someone doesn't make you famous. Oh, wait. Heidi & Spencer. Paris Hilton. Ooops.

    ReplyDelete
  97. My boyfriend was reading over my shoulder, saw you guys using "ineffable," and asked, "What does that even mean... ineffable... is that even a real word? Google it!" He was absolutely not kidding. He has no idea what this website is for or who JA is, and he immediately picked up on how awful that word is. In the past he's always caught a glimpse of the Nonsociety website and commented on how awful the sideways scrolling is. He called it a "rookie mistake."

    ReplyDelete
  98. Oooh, Julia Allison Baugher! 12 crushes!! WOW! I bet they make you feel so tingly inside, oops, I mean ALIVE. Are you going to write down their names in your pink slam book and put stickers next to their names and then play the fortune teller game where you see if you get a mansion or a house or a Jaguar? SIGH. You are SO lucky to have 12 crushes. I just have 6 and it keeps me up all night. Your 12 crushes must REALLY keep you up at all hours, dreaming about them and what not. Do you cut their pictures out of Wired magazine and tape them to your bathroom mirror? I know I do!! Can we get together and giggle about our crushes and trade headbands and ribbons? Mom says she'll drop off if your mom picks up!!!! Maybe we can have a slumber party!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  99. Hooray for Julia, who only feels alive when she has a man dominating her thoughts. KEEP SETTING US BACK.

    ReplyDelete
  100. Re @juliaallison: “I have about twelve (12!) crushes right now, and they're making me feel very alive!”
    I take it these are the men who's business cards she collected on her recent travels (courtesy of Randi Z., her very generous hook-up coordinator) and to whom she plans to send JuliaAllison TM "I think you're kinda awesome" notes.
    Cast a wide enough net and maybe one of them will bite. The old dudes sure seem to be enthralled with titty flashes, and by now they're probably all fairly expert at deafening themselves to the pretentious and blah blah blah that goes along with the visual.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Yeah, Julia Allison - keep that euphoric "alive" feeling for as long as you can until you crash and burn from the rejection that these executives you met at Davos and DLD show you after you send them stalky thank you emails.

    The mental illness, the daddy issues, the virgin/whore little girl complex... it's all pretty fascinating to watch, but not in a good way.

    ReplyDelete
  102. Dr. Psycho: Julia resents your remarks! Or she would, if she understood them.

    This has probably been covered over here, but it occurred to me that if David Karp of Tumblr is an investor in NonSociety, then he may have been covered on taking down Charlsie's Tumblr by some kind of employment agreement that he had with her. Or something. Eh, I have no idea what I'm talking about.

    Either way, it sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Anon 8:47
    It makes me sad that JA has totally ruined the word "ineffable." I think it's lovely, if used properly, which JA has yet to do.

    12 crushes?! No wonder she has no time to blog, er, "lifecast"; she's too busy scribbling their names on the front of her Lisa Frank Trapper Keeper.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Trapper Keeper?! You made my day.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Dr Psycho- you are SO right- she totally has a virgin/whore complex. Nail on the head.

    ReplyDelete
  106. The madonna-whore complex is something men have that informs the way they fetishize women, not something women create.

    ReplyDelete
  107. So what do you call Julia Allison's slutty school girl routine?

    ReplyDelete
  108. JA's personality and behavior seems to be based entirely on men and their approval. The M/W complex may be a thing men have, but she personifies it in essentially see-sawing between the whore (in dress) and the madonna (verbally). Basically, exposing your body on the regular (Gawker condom dress, sports-bra only spinning shots, short skirts with thigh highs, endless cleavage-enhancing tops etc. etc. etc.) and in ways that wouldn't be considered purposefully seductive/provocative (there's a way and you don't have to be showing all the goods to do it) while attempting "balance" with proclamations of not having sex, not being slutty (she had to issue a disclaimer during her short skirt and thigh highs episode that she didn't get to be slutty very often or something to that effect) just doesn't work. She strikes me as the type that may be very inhibited when it comes to the bedroom (particularly as it might require a more convincing performance than she's accustomed to), but seeing how men respond to sexuality in women, she tries to get a leg up in that way, having very little else of substance to offer. Honestly I think the innocent non-slutty thing is to keep her appearance "clean" for potential sponsors/advertisers and maybe even future husbands (if ever).

    ReplyDelete