Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Julia: Finally Forgoing Minnie Mouse Headbands and Visible Bobby Pins



Trying the hair up for the second half of today. This morning I wore a headband with a little green summer dress and I felt … dowdy.


She's lisssstennnnning!

Hey, Jackles! Since you're paying such close attention, could you try something else for us? Like closing up your blog and getting some extensive therapy? Thanks.

56 comments:

  1. I'm starting to feel bad for her (not really)

    It's obvious this site is getting to her, but she's not relenting in her delusions.

    Jules, sweetie, time for a come to Jesus moment where you fall at the feet of the interwebs and admit your sins. Let the cool forgiving waters of Galilee wash over you to cleanse your sins.

    Ah, who the heck am I kidding? Call MAACO, tell them to get the spray booth ready, and get your game face painted on. Detractors be damned!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whatever the hell that top is that she's wearing, it looks ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is nothing this woman can put on at this point that won't look ridiculous. She's fried in the membrane and hasn't a klew anymore.

    So much agreement with the cure proposed by Web2.0Morons -- it is her only chance for every looking good again (though that is the least of her problems).

    ReplyDelete
  4. She still has the caked on clown make up, I see.

    Honey, sometimes less is more.

    ReplyDelete
  5. JA, since you are reading this..

    How dare you think you are entitled to trash the NS brand so your business partners have nothing!

    Get a work ethic or give up , one of the f'ng two..

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow, reverse course - dowdy was good, dowdy was authentic. Now she looks like an extra from Robert Palmer's immortal "Simply Irresistible":

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3geoXOdnJQ

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Har dee har har. So Mary gets praises for her edgy new look, Julia attempts to look edgy and modern too, and fails miserably. We all predicted she'd get laughed out of the tents for her complete lack of style and it looks like it happened. But I am sure she just wants to stay home because she's so upset over Dan, NOT because she's a tacky has-been frump, riiiight? Oh, and can anyone tell if she photoshopped her wonky eye again?

    Julia, you're not so much dowdy as you are unsophisticated and unimaginative and that can't be helped with a change of outfit or hairstyle, cupcake. But kudos to you for finding something trivial to bitch and moan about AGAIN, you big dumb baby.

    ReplyDelete
  9. are there photos of this 'dowdy' look?

    ReplyDelete
  10. JA = the ultimate yunnie (young urban NARCISSIST)

    ReplyDelete
  11. julia.nonsociety.com isn't loading any posts. (yay!)

    ReplyDelete
  12. SA, I wonder why there are no photos either. She's usually a photo maniac. I guarantee for every 1 photo we see of her, there's 100 taken in the same outfit that she obsessively goes over, selecting the very best...

    ReplyDelete
  13. See, I worry when we regress to this kind of critiquing because it makes our valid criticisms look just as bad. Oh well, keep on doing yo thangs.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dear Julia, since you obviously read this site I just have to bust out some advice for you: you are a naturally pretty girl. How about washing off the clown makeup, use a little concealer if you have some zits, maybe a little blush and mascara to make you look perky. But no full face foundation/contouring makeup. You are 27 years old! Wear your hair loose and natural. Try wearing jeans and a sweatshirt and just get out there amongst real life for a change! Get on a train and go to the Cloisters or visit MoMA or something! Try taking photos of other people/things for a change. You live in New York City and have the world at your fingertips. If NYC is not doing it for you (and this "lifestyle" you are promoting on NS is obviously not making you happy), how about going back to Chicago and chilling out for a while? It's not too late xo

    ReplyDelete
  15. Has she traded in the porno skirts and 80s headbands to go Hawaiian? Not doing it for me, Jules, and perhaps not the look for NYC. And why do you cover fashion week, again?

    ReplyDelete
  16. You can totally tell she is opening her eyes up EXTRA WIDE to make up for and mask the wonk eye. Wonk, wonk.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I cannot believe that she is standing in front of a mirror (other picture on NS directly preceding, or following, this one) and still somehow fails to notice how completely unflattering those particular booties are to her particular legs.

    ReplyDelete
  18. So How Much did you think Tumblr invested in NS?

    NS is not the only start up Tumblr invested in to try one of the re alpha version/systems as the other non Julia/Non-NS rebloggers also targeted another startup dong something similar to NS in using an alpha version of tumblr with new features.

    Should not full disclosure of that and the amount be part of the TOS change announcement?

    I think Tumblr invested $50,000 into NS..

    ReplyDelete
  19. You know, you can just google "julia allison facebook notes" and see all of her posts. Thus, preventing page views from nonsociety.

    ReplyDelete
  20. however, since she reads this blog, she will likely prevent access..

    ReplyDelete
  21. Booties are flattering on no ones legs. i think she looks pretty good actually. And i like that top ha.

    ReplyDelete
  22. She looks like she's about to perform in a Chinese opera. Tis a shame, because she is, I think, naturally pretty. She doesn't actually need all of that make-up.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Did Meghan call JA's parents to execute an intervention?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Can we address the eyebrows? The triangular, penciled, brow-shadowed eyebrows? WHY? Actually, I don't care why. Just please stop, Julia. That's the part of the makeup mask that really gets me. Your eyebrows are probably fine the way they naturally are.

    ReplyDelete
  25. THIS JUST IN FROM DAVID KARP:

    ’ve read several hundred responses from users who are upset about the recent changes to our Content Policy.

    First, let me again apologize for taking action before publicly explaining these policy changes. Some internal confusion lead to five accounts being suspended prematurely.

    To clarify, this policy specifically targeted “reblogging-blogs”, where the sole purpose is to repeatedly reblog posts from a specific user or group. We view this as an abuse of our reblog feature, which places accountably on the identity of the poster.

    While there are still relatively few blogs of this genre on Tumblr, they’ve become an increasing detriment to our service as they’ve started to proliferate.

    Our moderators make no determinations about your posts, except for spam and illegal content, and we have zero interest in censoring your voice. But we now realize this is the first time our Content Policy forbids content that is potentially meaningful.

    After giving this serious consideration, we think it would be more appropriate for us to give you the control to police this content, rather than our moderators. So we’ve hurried to finish a new block feature that will let you filter content from your post notes and Dashboard.

    In light of all this, we’ve decided to restore the accounts affected, and remove the language in question from our Content Policy. It was a miscommunication that lead to these accounts being removed prematurely, but it was my decision to leave them off. In retrospect, this was the wrong decision, and I hope we can work to regain your trust and continue building Tumblr into something great.

    - David

    A negative NYT article will will change a young man's mind, apparently. And THANK GOD. Buagher forever! Just checked and they're all back up.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ha, ha, ha! Fuck you, Julia Allison Baugher!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Well, David knows how to admit a mistake and make a correction. Julia, you should do the same. Stop posting close-ups of your stupid face and start apologizing. Then get off the freaking internet for A YEAR, at least. Everybody loves a comeback, right? Now get lost.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Fuck him.

    Too little, too late. Now he just looks like a schmuck who can't stand by his own decisions. Not that I agreed with them, I don't. But if you're going to be a CEO you better have the sac to stick by your decisions. Oh, and enough sac not to let some sociopath dictate how you run your business.

    Whatever. The dashboard and entire interface is still useless.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Sweet, sweet victory!!

    Let's see Jankles in her party-hatted glory celebrating that one, hahahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

    Looks like you're hanging out in the wind on this one, you stupid, stupid cunt.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Wow. First Facebook. Now Tumblr. Interesting couple of days on teh interwebs.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Unless Charlsie's blog returns in it's original form, I wouldn't consider this matter closed. That deletion was the most striking example of Karp's allegiance to NS and until it's addressed questions should still be asked.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I never trust any photos of hers that are cropped and don't have the camera info in the properties, now that I know what a devotee of Photoshop tools she is. I think there is some evidence that she made her arm look skinnier, because there is a double-line reflection/shadow on that white cabinet behind her, and one of the lines is out of kilter right near her arm.

    Just stirrin' the pot, trying to goad her into posting an actual candid. If those Valentine's roses could also be in the shot with her, that would make my day complete.

    ReplyDelete
  33. It's freezing in NY. Where is she going with that on?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Time for a lip dub bunnies!

    *****

    How can it be permissible
    She compromises all journalistic principles, yeah yeah
    That kind of narcissism is mythical
    She's anything but typical

    She's a craze Cisco shouldn't endorse, she's a powerful force
    You're obliged to conform when there's no other course
    She used to look wonky to me, but now I find her

    Simply incorrigible
    Simply incorrigible

    Her ego is so powerful, huh
    It's simply unavoidable
    The trend is indefatigable
    The woman is ineffable

    She's a natural law, and she leaves me in awe
    She deserves no applause, but I surrender because
    She used to look wonky to me, but now I find her

    Simply incorrigible
    Simply incorrigible

    Simply incorrigible
    She's so lazy, there's no tellin' where Nonsociety's money went
    Simply incorrigible
    She's all crazy, there's no other way to trainwreck

    She's unavoidable, I keep going back to her blog
    She gives me nausea like I never felt before
    I'm breaking promises, she's sneaking in her dog
    She used to look wonky to me, but now I find her

    Simply incorrigible
    She's so lazy, there's no tellin' where Nonsociety's money went
    Simply incorrigible
    She's all crazy, there's no other way to trainwreck

    Her methods are inexcusable
    The proof is irrefutable, ooh-ooh-ooh-ooh-ooh-ooh-ooh
    She's so completely kissy-faced, huh
    Their lives are a complete waste

    ...

    ReplyDelete
  35. you're crazy. there is a mirror, resting at a slant, behind her.

    Follow the mirror's frame down, past her arm. It makes sense.

    SheeeesH!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Unles she's going to reinstate all of the tumblrs he had killed, he should just go back to spooning with Forman. That includes mine. Not that I'm even going to continue it, but he still deleted a Tumblr that had no inappropriate content.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Anyone else notice that David Karp doesn't follow JAB on Twitter?

    ReplyDelete
  38. She puts on a "little green summer dress" in February? While Anna Wintour wears long sleeves and neck scarves? Gah, at least look to style icons for cues on how to dress appropriately, since you don't have a freakin' clue.

    And "sheesh" anon, did you enlarge that pic before dismissing the theory? Why would only one of two close parallel lines be wavy at only one small point?

    You did see that evidence posted earlier where she accidentally uploaded a pic of her and her video guy where she had a photoshopped eye in mid-clone, and quickly uploaded the fixed version, didn't you?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Here ya go:

    Before (with accidental clone tool):
    http://23.media.tumblr.com/NB8YioMLik0bshhuCLP7588zo1_r1_500.jpg

    After:
    http://13.media.tumblr.com/NB8YioMLik0bshhuCLP7588zo1_r3_500.png

    ReplyDelete
  40. Where's the smiiiiile, thought she was haaaappppyyyy

    ReplyDelete
  41. I don't think she shopped her arm (this time).

    http://i42.tinypic.com/sc6df8.jpg

    I think the waviness is the reflection of a door hinge. (Not the reflection of the other doorhinge that I circled; I just circled that as another place in the photo where you can see a similar hinge.)

    I think if anything in that photo is suspect, it's the bags under her eyes. iMac photos are very pixelated and the pixels under her eyes are smudged.

    Also, that pink shirt is ridiculous.

    xoxolol,
    Rachael Osborn

    ReplyDelete
  42. iMac? What am I saying. I meant Photobooth.

    ReplyDelete
  43. THAT FUCKING EYELINER!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  44. OMG I LOVE the "simply irresistable/incorrigible" song. Please someone do a lip dub and post it here.

    As for Karp, the whole situation is not perfect but I respect this final response. It's what they should have done to begin with. Never underestimate the power of a small group of commited bloggers and commenters.

    --Ineff.

    ReplyDelete
  45. when amongst the prettier (i posted this above in the wrong thread...)

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/Julia%20Petra%20Nemcova%20Phillipe.JPG

    ReplyDelete
  46. narcissist headbandFebruary 18, 2009 at 9:49 PM

    thank god the headbands are gone, at least for tonight. julia, i am glad you woke up. the headband hairstyle and bobbypin 'do are just horrific, particularly in the fashion-conscious atmosphere of NYC (not to mention fashion week).

    ReplyDelete
  47. Kill me now. I like the hair pulled back. The top and skirt, and yes, boots, are not terrible. I for one, [emphasis on one] think to criticize the june cleaver/blair/whatev-- and not at least recognize an attempt, is uncharitable. So, I say, bully for you bunny.

    Mary and her brittany spears jacket [didn't she borrow that too--or is she secretly buying all these clothes and pretending she is poor cause [while she can't write for shit] she can read the writing on the walls.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Oh Julia. Eyes or lips, honey. Eyes or lips.

    Also: going tits-out to events is cute when you are 22; when you are past that age and pretending to be a business lady with important journalismisms to say, you might want to save your average cleavage for the bedroom.

    ReplyDelete
  49. huge-ass arm: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3308/3279866648_b7a87b6dd2_o.jpg

    hahaha.

    (double-posted to more recent entry, too.)

    ReplyDelete
  50. Uhm, now 22 year olds hold the right to going tits-out to events? Where the F are you from?

    Hey you 23 year olds cover up your tits, cover em up now!!!

    are you this stringent on 23 year old + boys? No, didn't think so.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anon 11:21, It's called decorum and applies equally to both genders.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Jack-- I have loved ya, your comments and so forth, and we can rip on julia for days--yeah I Know--but cleavage is a cheap shot at fashion week while mary is wearing an outfit approriate for a carribean dinner. This isn't even big cleavage.

    and gender specific, no one, and I embarrass myself by knowing this, but no one has criticized Adrian.

    but, maybe that's cuz with mary's stellar reporting none of us know whether his name is Adrian, Andrien, Adnrian or one of the other F'd up ways she spelled it.

    just sayin' don't think jab's tee-shirt/w/ruffles was all that bad. hit on something of substance, like her ridiculous character that she portrays that has exhausted us, and apparently affected her.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Wow, I am definitely NOT a NS fan, and I came across this site from a link on Tumblr.

    If you all dislike her so much, why waste the time here even thinking about her / them? Seriously, it's like a waste of energy, like me sitting here even typing this out.

    Again, I don't sympathize with her (feel sorry more than anything), but all of this just seems odd. Everyone talks about others "growing up"...

    ReplyDelete
  54. That's your opinion sweets, we will defend to the death your right to declare it. But we do not have to agree. We are all here for our own individual reasons, and more often than not - it's pity and spectacle. One cannot put themselves in the spotlight and not expect that at least some of the attention granted will be of the appalled and/or negative sort. I personally don't hate any of them, but I'm very into human behavior and trainwrecks (or examples of what not to do).

    ReplyDelete