Saturday, February 14, 2009

BREAKING NEWS: Julia Gets Male Attention!

juliaallison

  1. A boy sent me roses.


And this is another interesting attack on the new design. Love the suggestion that the Web designer is trying to sabotage them.

UPDATE: Now with photographic evidence!

50 comments:

  1. Does it count if it was her father? Or if it was in exchange for 'services rendered'?

    ReplyDelete
  2. from* her father! Gah!

    ReplyDelete
  3. That was totally my first thought. Either her father or her brother.

    Also, just did a little housekeeping and combined two posts if you're wondering what happened to the other one that was up for a few minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This may have been from the hideously rich suitor who provided by the matchmaker. For a nominal sum, he may be able to get laid tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't know if anybody has been keeping tabs on the QOTD over there, but apparently a sensually/sexually liberated woman with a genius-level IQ is taking these girls seriously and writing her thoughts on feminism. Genius-level IQ!? Really?! At NS? Gentle Jesus. I'm ashamed for genius-level IQ'd women everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Also: note infantile, tweeny use of "boy."

    ReplyDelete
  7. Uh, I can't open Mary's site/cite/sight...getting a dns error message...

    Technical difficulties? Or Mary thinks the tutu Jules picked out for her looks hideous?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Holy wow, one of my comments got reblogged (recommented?). Can I put that on my resume and get a media pass for Fashion Week??

    ReplyDelete
  9. Do it, Anon! And put Russian Girl down as a reference!

    ReplyDelete
  10. She claims she took a photo of the roses with her iPhone, yet the background is completely white, like a piece of clipart. And what is that faint pink box in the lower right corner? Watermark? Logo from online florist?

    Does anyone have links to NASA for a forensic photo analysis? I need more evidence for the case I'm building to have her involuntarily committed to a mental hospital.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If I were Julia Allison--and thank all that's holy that I am not--I would so TOTALLY send myself roses on Valentine's Day and then blog them to death to make myself look more desirable/popular/appealing than I really am. Then I'd deduct the cost from my taxes as a business expense.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I still haven't been able to find their supposed ethics statement of their site.

    ReplyDelete
  13. One bouquet for the hottest lil' all-growed-up Lolita on the planet?

    Jackal, where are the love tributes from your 12 crushable suitors? Your hundreds of thousands of adoring fans? Your grateful sponsors? Surely Gawker sent you a giant box of frenemy-scented cupcakes, at least?

    *crickets chirping*

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes, its a watermark and you can tell she croped the image to cut it out of view..

    ReplyDelete
  15. Come on, really? I just did a Google image search of red roses/bouquet of red roses and couldn't find it in the first few pages.

    Let this be our mission!

    FIND THE MATCHING FAKE PHOTOGRAPH! Then call Nurse Ratched! Someone needs some electro-shock!

    ReplyDelete
  16. you dont think that its on a white table with light coming in her balcony doors from behind it?

    xoxo

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anon: I think it is. A stock photo would be in focus, no? But I am perplexed by that bit of pink in the bottom right.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Har! Jules read the comments here about which pictures were taken with what camera yesterday and stuck that 'taken with my iphone' line in there because she deduced that enough of us would click on to see the flowers. dumb like a bunny!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I mean, she is not known for telling anyone where any of her pictures come from, [although she does seem to be taking note of that as well--yesterday she finally credited someone's photo]

    Here's your reality show Bravo!!

    Who's puppetmaster is it anyway?

    Sweet fun comedy about an undesignated number of people and Jules hashing it out on the internets.

    I'd watch it, oh wait, I am.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Russian Girl

    Do not shave anything for the pilot!!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. The bunch is standing on her white bed sheets and she has taken the photo from above. The pink blur in the right hand corner is a pillow on her bed.

    At least that is what I reckon.

    ReplyDelete
  22. If you click on the 'watch live coverage of fashion week' link on their site/cite/sight,

    You get last year's show of Mary getting made up.

    Chat line is full of "how is this live?" and an erstwhile "Julia sucks"

    Fashion week [one day in] seems to be in the class of CES, DLD, and everything else they fucked up

    ReplyDelete
  23. I opened up the "photo" in Fireworks and put it through a few filters. That pink thing is transparent, so it can't be a solid object like a pillow. Also, the white areas have no shadows, no wrinkles on the bed sheets, no table edge.

    Julia, be a darling monkey and post some more photos of your beautiful bouquet. Perhaps you could sniff them appreciatively. Maybe Marshmallow could be chewing on the wrapper, or you could wear the ribbon as a lovely hair bow. Otherwise, I'm afraid we'll have to take the absence of any personally identifying details as proof that you did not receive those particular roses on this specific date.

    (I'm stuck on the couch with an injured ankle today. This keeps my mind off the pain. It's better than codeine!)

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think these are from the guy who texted her saying he was going to "rock her sushi world" (did anyone listen to the radio interview?). Those leaves in between the roses look like the leaves that California Rolls are wrapped in... I don't know their name, I don't eat sushi!

    ReplyDelete
  25. you guys are crazy!

    ReplyDelete
  26. hmm Maybe the boy was Mary's male dog Mason that sent Julia roses?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Heh, those folded over leaves look like dirty tongues. The word "taint" also comes to mind, for some odd reason. Must.look.away.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Is anyone else really excited to see the godawful outfit Julia has put together for this barbie show (WTF is that?). Red tutu? Really, Jankles? This shit is about to get good.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yes, the Barbie Fashion Show!! I need more details on where/when/how so I don't miss the show of the century. Never was there an event more suited to the Pink Lady('s ego).

    That live chat could make for some lulz. I think it starts up for real on Sunday.

    I think the best term for anything Julia wears is "getup". Outfit sounds too dignified. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  30. I sent those flowers to Lily. I don't know why that big pink talking blob thinks they're for her.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I'm quite sure this is an Iphone pic but I'm doing a bit of research.

    Everyone get their pepto ready---we have Barbie pics coming!!!!!!!!!

    BTW, the woman who made those tutus for her specialized in CHILDREN's tutus. She normally does not make adults' tutus. HA!

    ReplyDelete
  32. how does she buy all these things and have photo shoots and flights and stuff?? how does it happen!?!?!!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Is anyone else able to open Mary's page?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Ya know, it's pretty sad that the ebay auction bids have stalled out at $305 for the charity:water twestival event. Do you think it might have something to do with the fact that the link to ebay one of them posted, which the other two reblogged, DOESN'T WORK????

    These dopes need constant supervision. I normally wouldn't provide them this type of assistance, but it's for charity, fer cryin' out loud. They're just so damn lame I can hardly stand it.

    ReplyDelete
  35. i like the tutu because she's paired it with a white tshirt and great red shoes.

    i would wear it to a theme party.

    i just turned 20 years old.

    and i would never wear that headband. ever.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anony 4:21, you'd probably look great in that costume, tooBut then, you're nearly a DECADE younger than Jackles. She is tragic on an epic scale.

    (I like putting decade in all caps so Jules can see it better.)

    ReplyDelete
  37. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=50238751818&ref=mf#/notes.php?id=8656939666

    ReplyDelete
  38. Mary blogged a lame joke about how women giving blow jobs is comparable to men giving flowers. I guess because both are first date, getting-to-know-you gestures for her and her cohorts. That's so sweet.

    ReplyDelete
  39. any one else getting this message when they go to Julia's page?


    We couldn't find the page you were looking for.

    Feel free to contact support if there's anything we can help you find.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Anony 4:37, that's everything she posts to NS, without page views or ads. It goes back an entire year! That is freaking sweet!

    ReplyDelete
  41. anon 4:44

    I am getting a dns error notice on mary's page

    ReplyDelete
  42. folks the photo was stagged..

    top left corner tinge of yellow smudge..right lower corner same type of smudge..

    tape produces that type of smudge folks./.

    ReplyDelete
  43. New conspiracy theory

    the girls aren't speaking;
    went with new design to claim internet dificulties
    [again]

    Meghan> nothing [post was put up by an intern]
    Julia>staged picture of roses to keep ppl busy
    Mary>page cannot be found

    M&M jumped ship.
    It's just jackles!

    I too, am on the couch bored with cnn

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anon 4:37, you have no idea how helpful that is to us. THANKS!

    Funny to go back and read when she quit the Internet last March.

    ReplyDelete
  45. More than likely, third party javascript is invoking advertisements from another server, which could be running slow at any given time.

    The ads are doing more harm than good. Yippee-skippy.com!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Who the hell is this Dempsey in DC that Mary keeps posting about?

    ReplyDelete
  47. I did a google search and could not figure out who she was quoting.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Mary gives JA a HUGE dig in her reblog of the Barbie post. Passive aggressive as usual!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Here's Mary's dig:

    "

    juliaallison:

    And the Barbie show begins … It’s taking every ounce of self-control I have not to write everything IN CAPITAL LETTERS WITH 793 EXCLAMATION POINTS … THAT IS HOW MUCH I LOVED THIS SHOW.

    What a fun show to attend as Betsy won’t be showing at the tents.

    But this show begs the question, when ”big name” designers can’t afford to produce a runway show, why/how is Barbie? I obviously don’t know the whole story, but I don’t think Barbie is sending a recession-friendly message here. (Not that we are always conscious of that. We simply post our life as it happens.)
    "

    ReplyDelete