Wednesday, April 22, 2009

UPDATED: Julia: Classy; Ashton and Demi Must Be Impressed

UPDATE: A commenter just made a good point. By reprinting Jackles's Tweet about about overhearing a famous celebrity having a fight with her spouse, we are repeating the gossip.

And so we have removed it.

To summarize: Jackles claims to have heard a celebrity who lives in her building having a knock-down drag 'em out fight with her spouse. But because she added a sad:(, it's perfectly acceptable that the woman who frequently decries the lack of decency, manners and respect for privacy on the Internet was airing someone's personal, private business.

It's shit like this that makes me not feel so bad when we post photos of her looking like hell. Why would anyone feel the need to Tweet that? Text message a close friend, yes. Tip Page Six? Why not, she knows the numbers and e-mail addresses off by heart. Tweet it to thousands of strangers including the celebrities she so desperately wants to befriend? No.

I noticed she deleted it soon after she posted it, but it lives on on Icerocket Twitter search.

62 comments:

  1. http://www.vimeo.com/4159066

    ReplyDelete
  2. She is a vile piece of shit. I first realized just how evil she is when she not only revealed her ex's alleged mental health issues, and then not only expected him to buy her an expensive laptop, but then accused him of playing a victim when he rightly refused.

    Short of physical violence, there is nothing that anyone can do to this fugly (by her own doing) hag that can be bad enough.

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.vimeo.com/3830830

    ReplyDelete
  4. oh on side note somethign you missed..

    April 22th Buagher reblog post..

    "Also, I am going to have drinks with her soon.' as why discussing will not parse Mary's new blog any more unless she does something really JA stupid..

    why do I get the felling that Mary Rambo might have been smart enough to send reblogging baugher some items without any trace of it was her?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rosie has a rarely used pied a terre across the hall from Julia. It's a shoebox that Rosie uses when she comes into the city for meetings and such. She's not a regular neighbor and she uses this ONLY once in a blue moon. Nice try, Jules. Rosie has a HUGE spread in Nyack and another in Miami.

    Also, wTF??? Didn't she storm the SXSW blogger lounge to discuss the importance of privacy visa vie dating on the web??? She's a fucking air head who will get everything she deserves. Karma is a bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  6. someone more tech savvy than me needs to send that tweet link to rosie o'd

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gwyneth's Inner AspectApril 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    I get it, I do. It is OK for Julia to tweet a celebrity neighbor's fight because she is "sad :(" about it.

    So, Russian Girl, next time you call Julia fat, just add the appropriate Russian emoticon.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You ever wonder if Rambolina doesn't dish on JA because...well, that's WHAT JULIA WOULD WANT??? More attention, another gawker story about Mary Rambin shittalking JA? JA getting to play the 'I was such a good friend, she is sooooo mean for no reason' card?

    You know that Mary has no intention of giving Jabs any more media attention than she has to!

    ReplyDelete
  9. *3:40

    It's true. Julia's besties, include Dan and Krystal, have regularly tipped off blaugher.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I noted below but it's worth repeating. Blaugher was emailed by Page Six, per her latest post, to see if she recognized the sender of the football player tip. She did recognize the sender as a regular tipster to her own website. She doesn't say who but we can only guess it's Julia.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You know what's interesting is she probably has no way of knowing it's Kelli. It could be any woman, although it probably likely is Kelli, but she's still just assuming. I mean *that* could be considered libel.

    ReplyDelete
  12. hey!
    Whatever with the page 6 stuff!
    Send the rosie link to rosie!
    That's this post topic!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nobody send it! Per usual, julia would love the ineffable ROSIE O responding and giving her attention, YAY.org HAR!

    ReplyDelete
  14. no! send it! she's earned the headache

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah, don't give the Pink Lady her devoutly wished-for stunt bump. Even though she seems to have rapidly thought the better of her little toxic gossip spill. Poor, poor Julia Allison, reduced to hypocrisy of an astounding order in furtherance of her dwindling public profile.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't understand. Julia Twitters this gossip and she's a bad person. RBNS posts it and they're..what exactly?

    ReplyDelete
  17. There's no need to trouble Rosie with the insanity of one of her neighbors. Truly.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 412...
    ... calling her on it

    ReplyDelete
  19. 4:12 :

    The custodians of Julia Allison's sievelike memory, that's what.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It was very nice of you to take it down, Jacy and I do see the logic but I think it's ultimately unncessary. Redacting the name maybe but this freak deserves what is coming to her. Also, knowing Rosie, she'd laugh it off with a big F U. She fights with the best of them.

    ReplyDelete
  21. RBNS is a reblog site specifically focussed on the effrontery that is NonSociety and it's f(l)ounder, JABa the c*nt.
    To read or comment you have to deliberately come here.
    RBNS is not a creepy gossiper namedropping about its next-door neighbours' and their drama to the entire twittersphere.
    There is a HUGE difference, anon 4:12.
    Julia Allison Baugher has pulled countless indescrete and despicable stunts like this one. Reporting about her is not the same as being her.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I can't stand all the "high and mighty" folks that visit RBNS and leave a comment of "this is just as bad..."

    Where exactly do you think you came? And what is our inspiraation? Seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Her parents should be ashamed of this mess of a nutjob. Even if they "ignore the hate sites" more than one of their friends or neighbors has passive aggressively mentioned something they read on Ja.
    This goes beyond pathological.
    Mary's parents obviously did a top job with her. People may call her entitled but she certainly knows a thing or two about handling all of this b.s. with dignity and grace.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I am glad you removed it...I loved loren feldman, but he waited a year to put up the part 2 of the SXSW meeting with julia, and yeah, I was interested in seeing it but when he started asking her about her treatment of J L, I thought the same thing, Feldman is just keeping it alive.

    Some stuff is too ugly and I wish more people could police themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  25. That gossip should die because it being out there is disrespectful. Doesn't mean we still can't think Julia is awful for posting it initially. Thanks, commenter and Jacy, for the foresight.

    ReplyDelete
  26. How could she seriously think it was a good idea to blurt out somebody else's private business like that? What an imbecile.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Not cause I am high and mighty, but...

    ReplyDelete
  28. this site is RIDICULOUS. totally unnecessary to remove reference to who the neighbor is, in fact it only serves to make it more sensational. it's like RBNS's combined IQ is *almost* over 100, and then the commenters only drag it down even further.

    ReplyDelete
  29. WTF? I think some of you people are crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Seriously, TJ! Is Anon 4:40/4:41 even literate?

    I also *hate* people that type like *this* to imply italics. Good writers don't need italics.

    ReplyDelete
  31. FormerGawkerEmployeeApril 22, 2009 at 4:49 PM

    I pity the people behind RBNS. You can't win. Everything you do or don't do, there's some asshole telling you that you made the wrong choice.

    Fuck you, 4:41.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Seriously, who cares who had an argument or had pregnant sex or whatevs. Newsflash Julia Allison Baugher, from time to time most couples have arguments AND sex. And many of them live in apartments.
    The point isn't who or what. Who cares? The point is that Julia Allison Baugher is an indescrete prudish bitch of a c*nt who likes to talk shit and name drop as if someone else's prominence or her "insider" knowledge somehow gives her a special cachet. It doesn't. Through no one's efforts but her own, Julia Allison Baugher repeatedly exposes herself publically for what she is: a nasty piece of work that no oversized head tampon can ever disguise.

    ReplyDelete
  33. 4:41: You delete it, dickwad, so that it doesn't come up in a Google search. Jackles doesn't even know it was her. RBNS was classy by removing it. You can find out who was involved by searching JA's Twitter and reading the comments, but it's not going to come up in a Google search anymore.

    How's your IQ doing?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Julia is your nosy, annoying old 75 year neighbor. Always up in everyone's business, thinks she's the queen of the neighborhood because she's always up in everyone's business, but really she's just an annoying crazy grandma who you wish would move already.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Meganaisse, you were all over Mary's ass for blogging about expensive shoes during a recession (so lame and see through ... you were just picking a fight with her because you're nothing more than a Julia puppet). You stand by the trash act that is Julia Allison Baugher through all her shit, including her pubic on-blog disses of Mary, to name just the tip of the iceberg.
    What the hell is wrong with you?!
    How many times are YOU going to have to change YOUR name in an attempt to flee the stink you've permanently tied it to? You already know that doesn't work.
    Integrity works though. Look it up.
    I pity both of your families.

    ReplyDelete
  36. JABA sez:

    "I'm interviewing psychic Karen Thorne - http://karenthorne.com/ - at 5:30 pm today. What should I ask her!?"

    This shit just writes itself. Why don't you ask her if you'll have any dignity next year?

    ReplyDelete
  37. I think Julia Allison putting up the [redacted] and [redacted] celebrity spat tweet near her shout-out to Tina Brown was an effort to give herself some currency just in case (hopey-hope-hope-hope) Tina decide to click on @juliaallison's twitter stream. Tina bait!!!!

    Tina bait that backfired.

    ReplyDelete
  38. @5:03PM

    Come on! Megs just got taken in some 5 year long confidence game involving some supposed mentor. It's clear that our Megs is not a good judge of character.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anon 5:07! hahaha ... good one

    ReplyDelete
  40. I was looking for an old photo last week, and ran across this, from last summer. Feels like a million years ago. I think there are some points in our lives where things change so rapidly, it’s like we’re living in dog years!yes, julia, and when you live in dog years, you also age in dog years. hence, your face.

    ReplyDelete
  41. A female dog is a _____________?

    ReplyDelete
  42. Does anyone else find the fact that she's opened up her Facebook account suspicious given she was just "scheming" about FB with RandiZuckerberg OMG OMG OMG, Meghan and Dave Morin?

    She's up to something.

    Either that or she's just hoping RBNS starts posting photos of her when she still looked good since all recent photos are horrible.

    I was also alarmed to see that the night she dressed up as a condom princess she was dating Michael, the one who got away. There are pictures of them together that night.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yes, she just 'ran across' an old photo in which she looked thinner, and she thought she would post it for old times' sake. Right.

    There are those ol' over-the=knee hooker boots, right on schedule. Now taking bets on costume for MIT talk. Get your wagers in now, bunnies.

    ReplyDelete
  44. That old photo that Julia Baugher just "happened" to run across also features Mary looking particularly not-so-great. Julia the Brat won't let her be the only one with ugly pictures on the internet today, by god!

    Her blog makes absolutely no sense at all. She has an agenda behind everything she posts or tweets, hoping this or that unnamed person will see it, but put together it just looks like a bunch of random crap with no central narrative, besides "I found this picture" or "I am reading this article." She is grasping at straws and having a pretend dialogue with famous people who will never, ever read her blog and certainly not hire her to write for The Daily Beast.

    And I really don't see how "scheming" to open up her FB account really amounts to much. Who cares? Her 15 minutes are up and being able to look at all of her old photos just serves to remind everyone of that fact. Moving along...

    ReplyDelete
  45. Here is the Michael Who Got Away and refuses to return her phone calls. It doesn't stop her from posting pictures of him every now and again.

    My God, he's in tech. It must KILL her.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Ooops, here's link:

    http://citydesknews.com/About.html

    ReplyDelete
  47. Corrections:

    -JA FB has been active for some time and is not new.

    -Reblogging Baugher does not reveal sources and thus Rambo could have been a source and thus the reason for reblogging Baugher having drinks with Rambo

    You guys are getting as sloppy as Meghanaise sloppy seconds

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anon: JA's personal Facebook profile has not been public EVER. She has two, a public one and a private one, and the one that is now open has never been open.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anon 5:42, you are mistaken. Julia's FB was always visible to members of the NYC network.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Well then she's expanded it, because I'm not in New York and I've never been able to see it until recently.

    ReplyDelete
  51. 5:36 :

    You make about as much sense as my little dog Mitzi. Especially that opaque sentence about Rambo.

    I luvs it when the RBNS protest types get all testy like.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anon 5:36 It seems the implication was that Julia Allison Baugher did tip the Post about being some QB's Saturday night girl (the "drinking water" giveaway for example).
    It also seems likely that JABa also tips the Baugher site as possibly does Mary too.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Julia's Exiled Jiminy CricketApril 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM

    The question is, how long until another "I am so happy/blessed/lucky" post? Or will it be a reference to or an email from Dan?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Julia need to build a time machine since she pines for the past so.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I thought that Mary never tipped Baugher, although Julia certainly fed Baugher some significant dirt on Mary.

    ReplyDelete
  56. i dont know if this is crossing a line of internet diagnostics but: i think jackles has no concept of what a respect-deserving relationship is like because she's never been in one (or respected them herself) and THIS is why she thinks its ok to publish on the internet the PRIVATE activities of others.

    and it is so disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Jackles may have deleted after reading one tweet where someone piped in wondering if Julia knows reporting unsubstantiated rumors about celebrities is slander.
    However, before that a bunch of people re-tweeted Julia's appalling gossip and so there it is in even wider distribution.
    Nicely done Julia Allison Baugher. Chalk up another proud moment.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Julia has 2 Facebook accounts with many levels of privacy settings. After meeting with Randi, and prior to her arrival in NYC, she opened up the privacy settings.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Oh, Meghanaisssse, you make it too easy:

    meghanashaI love direct message on Twitter, it makes me feel ALIVE!!!43 minutes ago from txt

    ReplyDelete
  60. Someone should go through Charles Foreman's facebook and tag julia in all her photos. kinda weird that he doesn't get that much talk time here but he has 400 picts of her up.

    ReplyDelete
  61. How did you get to Foreman's Facebook?

    ReplyDelete