Thursday, April 30, 2009

Tweets of Greatness




The past few days have been a treasure trove of JA-related Twitter animosity. In no particular order, here are some of our favorites:


amykish: @juliaallison who are u

richardtong7: Photo: juliaallison: fergalicious. tumblr.com/xew1nn6ng

tiffanywen: At julia's first time at noch's-@Tiffanywen: you're going to wait in this line?! @juliaallison: oh honey, i don't wait in lines

LinaMariePony: julia allison's a douche with a capital BAG

alanajoy: @juliaallison you have your very own techxpert... ask her. or if you hold down the home button and shove it up your ass that might help? xo

alanajoy: @juliaallison oh STFU: you realize you have something 2 prove and still feel u have something 2 prove? so DEEP. awareness isnt change, kiddo

brianvan: @juliaallison serious answer: usually it's something to address with a therapist. Normal goal-setting in adults follows a different pattern

alanajoy: @juliaallison you're disgusting. yes, i said. some things are OFF LIMITS and someones Cancer treatment is one of those things

urbanredneck: If Julia Allison has an expiration date can it be NOW? That moron literally just admitted she relies solely on her looks. I'm disgusted.

sharemefg: to pull a Julia Allison is to go to a pretend tech conference and pretend its real

201 comments:

  1. The Brian Van comment alone could lead to a midnight meltdown video.

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://julia.nonsociety.com/post_images/NB8YioMLimxc640kDa8ugWzVo1_500.jpg

    http://www.michael-jackson.com/mj2002.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Jacy,

    Can you please prove to us that you are not Julia Allison? I have been reading this site for about a year and it has always crossed my mind. This is what JA would do! Start an anti-her site to KEEP people talking about her, since that is all she cares about.

    Often I wonder... is JACY JULIA?

    Please prove to me that you are not Julia. Because (call me a conspiracy theorist, but I just think that it is possible that you could be.)

    ALSO - Have you and TJ and PP ever met in the flesh!!?? Like know each other personally?? Or is it just through blogspot.

    Think us comment fans need to have these issues cleared up.

    -Auntie Em

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've never met Jacy or PP in person, no.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting TJ... and I don't mean to throw you into this but I think it is important to us. Thanks for answering.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If Julia is smart enough to run this site then she deserves all the FU money in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is a very smart answer to Julia's Confusion dilema-


    ricoHM: @juliaallison: Step back. Reassess situation and priorities. Ignore sunk costs. Choose: follow through or have the courage to walk away. Do.
    21 minutes ago from we

    ReplyDelete
  9. And what if......BROTHER BRITT WAS BROTHER BRITT OMG!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Someone is trying to out the creators of this website. I highly doubt any normal commenter would care if one contributor had met another.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I discovered that PP is related to JA via a third cousin twice removed.

    ReplyDelete
  12. There are multiple "Jacy's" so uh, what

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes, but do the Jacys know each other? And is one Jacy really JA. And is JA a double-agent for Mary Rambin? And is Mary Rambin really a cyborg? And why do cyborgs look so good in orange?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Next we will learn that Julia Allison is Nick Denton, too. Would explain the tranny makeup.

    ReplyDelete
  15. For God's sake, how can you even entertain the idea that Julia is smart enough to maintain a site like this?

    It's already been proven that she takes herself way, way too seriously to do anything like that. While she may not mind negative attention, or even revel in it a little, she still wants to come out look good in the end. This site is not going to allow that.

    I honestly think Julia's day-to-day life is one long anxiety attack. I really think she has to hyperventilate every few minutes considering she is daily inundated with nasty emails, hateful twitter responses, etc.

    I don't really care who Jacy is. I just *hope* that Julia's frenemies are involved with this site, such as Rachel Sklar... although sadly, I doubt it.

    I'm still waiting for some sorority sisters to come out of the wood work to spill on Julia's time spent with Delta Gamma.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dahling,

    I'd love to hear from a sorority sister.

    BTW, you're absolutely right. Julia is the gal who wrote 5 words under a picture of an empty go cart. All in a day's work!

    Now if she were writing and maintaining this site, I could understand the need for a vacation. However, we all know she's not talented enough.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Also, can you imagine her having the energy and work ethic to do it? It would be more than ironic if she could run this and yet not produce more than one line captions to random pics of London fences on her official blog and no, it would not make sense for her to do it like this in order to keep the (trash) talk alive. If she had all these skills and was cunning enough to produce a rather elaborate scheme, she would be running a blog/lifecast/whatever that would prove all doubters wrong. Alas, she is not.

    ReplyDelete
  18. okay I guess I am found out..the last twitter is mine:)

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Auntie Em:

    Wow, they give you the internets on the short bus?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Russian Girl is in fact of a Russian prostitute that Jacy found on a street corner in Omsk. Jacy took RG home and cleaned her up, ala Curly Sue, and put her to work in front of a computer. Russian Girl splits her time between cyber sexing and writing for RBNS.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Boner from Growing PainsApril 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM

    """""""""""what do you do when you finally realize you're "trying to prove something" ... but you still have something to prove?""""""""""""


    Am I missing something? That makes no sense at all to me, yet all these have answers ready. Anyone want to translate?

    ReplyDelete
  22. I don't get it still. I think she's acknowledging that she looks like she's got something to prove (a negative) but, despite this realization, she's still got something to prove (and she's going to prove it!).

    ReplyDelete
  23. It just hit me that Julia Allison and this person may be two sides of the same coin:
    http://twitter.com/AKGovSarahPalin/status/1653268308

    ReplyDelete
  24. No, TJ, what she's saying is that the 'something' is what she's 'trying to prove,' but that 'trying' has to wait for the other 'something' that she 'still has' to prove, because 'trying to prove' is itself marked off from the 'you're' whereas what she 'still has' is directly associated with the subject 'you' i.e. I, so 'trying to prove' becomes a stance, a pose, while what you still have to prove represents the bedrock, real situation. If you 'still have' something, and you're 'trying to prove' it, what you have is what you're attempting. You possess, not the something, but the trying, and the necessity of proving. The something sits at a distance, but the necessity is very close, overwhelmingly so.

    ReplyDelete
  25. @7:57. Your reading is correct if one plays by rules of conventional grammar. However, I wasn't convinced that was her implication. Who knows! It's Jackles, after all.

    ReplyDelete
  26. That picture! I have never seen her eyes look more lifeless, and her mouth...! Her lips don't even look like lips--more like some strange candy-covered origami project.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Julia has neither the self discipline nor humility to run this site. Anything she does has to Have. Her. Name. And. Photo. Attached!!!!!!
    Really can't see her consistently providing content, or being smart enough to take the piss out of herself as a brand building exercise.

    ReplyDelete
  28. But where is Jacy? Big question. Julia is away. Jacy??? I know that if you are only you and not Julia you might be elsewhere. But come on! When there are people waiting in the curtains, how can we trust you if you are not totally 100% committed?

    JACY-JULIA... WTF?

    ReplyDelete
  29. She really does have dead eyes. Maybe she's a bot. They just made a few errors in the lab, what with the braying laugh, deep voice and manic disposition.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Is she doing The Thinker pose in that picture?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Jacy IS Julia. I believe it. Look at last posts. She is totally self-demolishing, but politely.

    GAWD!! What did we all fall for? This is JA's design/hope/need!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Jacy is Julia Allison? Whoa...

    ReplyDelete
  33. Lily has breast cancer!!April 30, 2009 at 8:22 PM

    I predict another RBNS unnecessary post "JULIA, Did she or didn't she?" Ummm... kind of like the one you posted about Mary. STOP LISTENING TO COMMENTERS AND PLEAS FOCUS ON THE TRUTH. for reals, yo!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Auntie Em, what are you all talking about? Can you provide some kind of cohesive argument please?

    ReplyDelete
  35. I have a better rack and way better gams than Jackles.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Yeah... a better gun rack in your Ford pick-up!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Are you saying you pad your bra when you want to become Jacy? Or you aren't Jacy?

    ReplyDelete
  38. I would be v amused if Rachel Sklar was one of the Jacys.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I also have no trout pout, a far larger nose and my hooters and my hair are my own. I have no tattoos, and I really don't like cupcakes. I do have a close friend named Mary; however I have never called her a bitch or told friends in our social circle that she's awfully wrinkly and an alcoholic who's ruining "my business." My brother's girlfriend doesn't secretly despise me. I don't blog about my friend's battle with cancer and publicly announce my plans to take care of him this summer without ever mentioning it to him. I don't have weird, nauseating Daddy issues. I don't endlessly pawn my not-totally-housetrained dog on other people. I don't believe women have an expiration date. I don't chase after married men. I don't dress like a Playboy schoolgirl hooker fantasy.

    Above all else, I do not bray.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Don't believe it. JACY is Julia!!!!!!!!!!

    Because Julia invented Reblogging Nonsociety. It is completely obvious!

    She has said this kind of publicity is crucial. DUH!

    Just take a moment to think, people!

    Jacy/Julia - Who cares about Mary? Your comment above makes NO SENSE!

    ReplyDelete
  41. The latest from Auntie Em's pathetic friend Julia: "OMG. Just ran into Anna Wintour in ladies room - alone! - @ National Magazine Awards. She smiled at me!"

    I think Auntie Em is David Karp in drag -- could you please prove me wrong, Auntie?

    ReplyDelete
  42. I have proof that Auntie Em is also chewball.

    ReplyDelete
  43. But jacy...if there so many of you, how is that really a good recap of you are?

    will are the jacys please stand up.

    I think full disclosure is necessary, at the point. How can we take your critiques for real if we dont know who you are...or if you are JA?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anon @8:50

    "How can we take your critiques for real if we don't know who you are"

    The short bus is SRO tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  45. *chuckling* What is going on?? Dare I ask? This is hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I think a lot of people must be drunk tonight. I know RussianGirl started early.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I am Auntie Em... I am not David Karp--how funny and amusing. THANK YOU about that one. I blog for one person and one person only. NOT JA!!!

    LOVE being on the defense here. OMG keep trashing me and saying shit and caring... and maybe I will.... Ummm...

    NOT FUCKING GIVE A SHIT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  48. I approve the comment above :)

    ReplyDelete
  49. Jacy... your posts are by far the most boring pieces of shit UMMMM EVER!!!. Who the fuck careS who they came from or else. Boooo! You

    ReplyDelete
  50. Jew-lia? Really? And that comment hasn't been killed...why?

    ReplyDelete
  51. I have thought Jacy = Julia for a long time too. Seems like she would love this site and she sure has the time for it. Also the bad things are never that bad, and there is never any info by first published by Julia herself. And, 'Jacy' always freaks the eff out if commentors ever stray from talking about Julia.

    ReplyDelete
  52. 1. Jacy is not Julia. A bunch of us from here used to trade e-mails months before this blog started. I know who Jacy is and it's not Julia.

    2. The jewlia comment and the Indian princess comments need to be axed.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Niece Novice No MoreApril 30, 2009 at 9:34 PM

    Ok, people slow down,

    Auntie Em's proposal is not that wacky,

    Go to motive: who actually gets something out of this?

    Uh, Julia. who by the way, has interns, who have a stake in her continuing endeavor to always be talked about, noticed.

    Look back to gawker, the comments there really were brutal, [and much more brillant] that still didn't stop her. She craved more...

    Somebody posted last week that they thought there was more of a julia connection here then anyone thought and the comment disapeared...

    Oh and Jacy is now posting that there are monitors to delete specific 'bad' comments, hmmmm julia tactic if I ever saw one.

    Jacy's response: her nose and tits are her own? Yeah, what else is she going to say?

    RBNS will probably be dusted off and come on here to knock down this theory, but really, who the hell has the kind of time to pull off this site simply because they don't like someone?

    Spare me the bullshit how it only takes a couple of seconds to comment here and there, nobody with a brain would buy that...Months of posts still exist, there are times posted on each post...remember, the internet isn't just guarding julia's memories.

    I think julia's involved here, this is how she dealt with baugher, she built her own hate site...

    and no more crap about how she isn't smart enough, cuz that doesn't fly either...or if you really believe she is so incredibly stupid, why have you all spent so much of the last three months obsessing about her.

    I believe you auntie em!!!

    ReplyDelete
  54. Apart from the obvious motivation for Julia to become Jacy (fame!), think of this: If she's made asses of you all, if y'all were so gullible to keep this site going and actually HELP her get more famous, how ingenious is that? If it does come out that J=J, anything negative on this site will be forgotten. I for one am impressed as all hell at the strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  55. FormerGawkerEmployeeApril 30, 2009 at 9:34 PM

    You poor troll (not trolls, people, it's one poor crazy person). You poor, poor troll. I wasn't certain it was possible for anyone to be sadder than Jackles.

    ReplyDelete
  56. 9:27

    Spot on, Jacy does get all wanky and julia-like manic if people don't stay on topic!

    Har!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Christan [with no fucking I ok]

    Why the hell should we believe you? Oh, you met Jacy, yeah, where? What does she look like?

    You troll here because the people at Gawker ignore your comments...cause you're a facebook commenter!

    ReplyDelete
  58. Hey Former

    What the fuck is sadder than someone who has to identify himself by his former [most likely intern] job?

    Dude, did you get fired cause you can't count?

    Way more than one, ass-hat!

    ReplyDelete
  59. Damn you people. I can never leave this site 'cause it's so entertaining. Now we have a Cold War scenario going on in which Julia = Jacy, or not. All these comments could also be a classic disinformation campaign run by Julia to discredit RBNS and demoralize all of its commenters so that they stop contributing. Oh so fascinating. I am kind of leaning towards a disinformation campaign since I figure Jules would have been greedy and plastered RBNS with Google Adwords if she were in charge.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anon 9:34

    I have had the same thought. (count me too former-asshat)

    This is some funny shit!

    ReplyDelete
  61. Really, when?

    I just don't like it when commenters start calling each other names and trying to out each other. That's the only thing that makes me "wanky and Julia-like manic." Because it's so boring and even more high school than this blog is, if that's possible, and yes, it's more fun just to stay on topic than to have every thread devolve into mud-slinging conspiracy theories.

    ReplyDelete
  62. 9:40

    Absolutely. Julia can't be feeling good about herself. A disinformation campaign may be entertaining her.

    ReplyDelete
  63. p.s. That was in reply to 9:27. And Christan was not a Facebook commenter on Gawker. She's a veteran and has been there for ages.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Hmmmm, Julia, I mean Jacy, I feel a new post is about to happen....

    As Christan [with no fucking I] would say..

    riiiiiiiiiight aaaaabout nooooooowwwww.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Bull fucking shit on christan being a long term commenter, remember, the internet guards those memories too.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Christan,

    Don't you have a facebook gawker log in and an original gawker log in?

    I know you from ages ago on Gawker. I'm not sure what this troll is getting at with this but it's so not true.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Buying into this more and more each minuteApril 30, 2009 at 9:53 PM

    OK, now I am convinced, I thought this was bullshit at first, [I didn't want to believe] but then Jacy, I mean Julia posts this:

    "Because it's so boring and even more high school than this blog is, if that's possible, and yes, it's more fun just to stay on topic than to have every thread devolve into mud-slinging conspiracy theories."

    CAUSE THERE ARE RULES ON A HOBBY BASED HATE SITE AND THE RULES ARE WE CAN ONLY HATE AND SLING MUD AT JULIA

    ReplyDelete
  68. The commenters have really ruined this site. Jacy, RG, BB, et al, if I were you, I'd do what Baugher does and not have any. This is such a screamingly funny blog and it drives JA right around the bend but all these complete wild-eyed lunatics have completely wrecked it. If anyone is JA, it's some of these trolls trying to make it so unpleasant to manage that they'll force RBNS down. I cannot believe some of you cannot see what all of this threadjacking is really all about.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Hey Jules

    Member when everyone thought Mary commented here [last week]

    Jacy/Julia's response was Mary?!?!?!

    It seemed so insiderey when I read it.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Jing,

    Yes, I have both. I always lose my password to Gawker and their system always craps out and I never get the reset password e-mail.

    I'd list my usernames, but I don't really have to. I gave my usernames when this blog first started. I'm hardly going to jump through hoops for trolls.

    Oh, I also know Jing from the e-mail group. There's about 7 of us on here from that group. And there is only one Jacy. And Jacy is not Julia.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Great Idea Jessica

    Cut the commenters off. Cause yeah, we're the reason the site is ruined. {and you know it was up for a webby award}

    But what a great way to prove the point.

    Cut us off! Do it now! Cause Julia would hate that?

    ReplyDelete
  72. "Yes, I have both. I always lose my password to Gawker and their system always craps out and I never get the reset password e-mail."

    Har and blerg!

    You really expect people to believe this???

    ReplyDelete
  73. I have commented on Gawker, their system does not crap out.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Could the lunatic conspiracy theorists on their day passes please go back to the hospital? Don't want to be missing during roll call!

    ReplyDelete
  75. Well ask Former Gawker Emp--

    that's probs why he doesn't work there any more.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Ya, this is total bullshit. Jacy, you can end this bullshit right now, simply repost the following image at the top of the next post:

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nJL2uoo4Yo0/SYefHbM--YI/AAAAAAAAAAc/95HJZGSWf5Q/s320/pic3.jpg

    This is the one that JA pulled from her blog because it would have put her married hedge fund dude in hot water w/ his wifey. It would make no sense for JA to censor said image and then repost here since she would never intentionally burn a bridge to a private jet.

    ReplyDelete
  77. So wait, Jacy says with certainty that Christan was not a facebook commenter, then, Christan states that she is, but she commented under other names as well, but she will not reveal names for trolls.

    You seven that e-mail each other, should get your stories straight.

    ReplyDelete
  78. There's a perverse part of me that enjoys the commenter loony tunes. Not as much as I enjoy the Jowlia loony tunes, but still.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Poor little bunny bingo, other bunnies aren't playing by the rules....

    Hop off too Bunny ass-hat.

    Ooooo, breaking rules, again and again.

    Checking those IP addresses, Julia/Jacy?

    ReplyDelete
  80. Anyone else look at the pic above and think of goat.se?

    ReplyDelete
  81. Somebody should e-mail Julia, Jing: fire up that Kate Jabs address and ask her once and for all, is she Jacy?

    Or you could use your real name...want me to tell you what it is?

    ReplyDelete
  82. LOL, there are so many stupid people (or just one stupid troll) in this post it's beyond ridiculous. Please work on stepping your game way the fuck up, because you're transparent as shit. Conspiracy theorists, that would be you.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Um, the comments are what I come here for. Same way the QoD is the only reason I even got on Julia's site before this was launched.

    I agree that the commenters here now are less well-read than the ones who read RBNS in the beginning, but Jacy is Julia? Seriously. Julia wastes her time writing love letters to herself.

    ReplyDelete
  84. I think there is merit to this.

    My IP address is Chicago...

    and don't go talking shit about my city!

    ReplyDelete
  85. 10:15

    she's got plenty of time to write both, girl doesn't sleep, right Jacy?

    ReplyDelete
  86. Yes guys yes!

    Julia WOULD put up unflattering photos of herself to keep the attention going! This falls in line with her contacting people AGRESSIVELY and with regularity to remove unflattering photos!

    Julia WOULD analyze her own behavior and that of her "friends" in lengthy posts on an anti-blog when she can't muster up a paragraph on the actual blog she's trying to stake her career and potential salary on!

    Julia WOULD permit posts that regularly recap the insider stories about her past, including the terrible MediaBistro article she never mentions, ever!

    WHY DIDN'T I THINK OF ALL THIS SOONER!? Oh, because I have a fucking brain.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Weak trolls are weak. The end.

    ReplyDelete
  88. My IP address is in my deep russian vulva crevice.

    ReplyDelete
  89. 10:15 #1

    If it's just one troll, [then damn, he/she is a fast typer] then don't negate your own argument by following up with [plural] conspiracy theoristS.

    but how are WE transparent, or are you just an ass-hat too?

    ReplyDelete
  90. 10:20

    So poetic....I bet you could get work as a comment deleter for RBNS.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Please stop talking about IP addresses as if people can stalk you with simplistic knowledge of your general location which is >>ALL<< it provides for the average person. For sobbing out loud, waaaaaaay too many dumbasses.

    ReplyDelete
  92. @10:18

    Ya, all good points. I think we just witnessed a weak disinformation campaign by team Jules. I just cannot figure how she gets people to go along with her schemes. I mean, so weak - the charlsie blog would have been JA's best chance at a controlled reblog and she shut that shit down ASAP.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Was it negated, or did you selectively skip out on the or, the parentheses or that conspiracy theories on a reblog in general are plain stupid? Fucking toolbag. SORRY THE SENTENCE AGREEMENT GOT YOU ALL BAJIGGITY. Seriously, I'm sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  94. How are you transparent? You must really not know the subject your staking your claim on if you believe she'd have even the slightest ability to orchestrate a reblog like this. The fail... it is epic. That's yoda-speak because I'm a geek and I found your IP so now I'm going to hunt you down.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Look at alexa: RBNS started at the exact time nonsociety was getting a bit less traffic. And after RBNS, nonsociety traffic has been steadily getting better. It's so obvious. Jacy=Julia!

    ReplyDelete
  96. @1st Anon 10:25 - Well, since it's Jules she'll be able to get a weak conference speech out of it. Maybe something about how she's the First. Person. Ever. to try to control bad press through intern abuse.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Yeah isn't that interesting 10:25? An intern blog spilling the truth in a harmless and innocent way gets shut down immediately once it's discovered (and said intern gets yelled at for having done it in the first place), but Julia is behind this blog. LMAO

    ReplyDelete
  98. As if Julia running this blog wouldn't be the nail in the coffin for all the speculation of rampant mental illness on her part. Is all this bullshit supposed to be some sort of defense or was it purposely meant to be hilarious?

    ReplyDelete
  99. @10:28

    I don't really see it...

    http://alexa.com/siteinfo/julia.nonsociety.com+rebloggingnonsociety.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  100. I said Jacy wasn't Julia.

    I never said the original RBNS wasn't.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Uhmmm, it's for the book.

    Hate to crush you all [ok, I don't really] but mary and meghan are in on it...

    oh, and this is the saddest of all [for bunny-bingo] rachel sklar is in fact julia's friend. FACT

    and no, I'm not julia, but apparently Jacy is.

    ReplyDelete
  102. Christan

    Way to jump the shark

    I'm starting to like you!

    ReplyDelete
  103. Christan

    More please.

    ReplyDelete
  104. There's a book deal on the table for $.01, OK?! So you shut your mouth!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  105. Yep, that reality tv deal they've got should really grease the wheels on the book deal.

    ReplyDelete
  106. @10:37

    Listen, I know for a fact that Meghan doesn't know what she is in and what she is not in on until at least 5 years have elapsed.

    ReplyDelete
  107. The DABA girls were a quasi-big sensation and could wrangle a book deal. But a reblog of an aging wannabe celeb and pals certainly will. Sure.

    ReplyDelete
  108. I thought it was really strange when RBNS got the supposed nonsociety twitter...

    as if, julia wasn't manic enough after the reblogging julia hit the internets...

    she has posted/bragged about all the domain names she bought in her spare-time...

    HOW, did she not get non-society as a twitter address?

    The fact that RBNS thought of it before she did is fairly incredible to me.

    Unless of course, she is involved with this.

    It does make sense, and the more you try to shout it down with weak arguments makes it seem more real to me.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Well you go ahead and think whatever soothes your soul hunnay. *pat on the head*

    ReplyDelete
  110. 10:37

    english please...

    ReplyDelete
  111. How is it shocking that RBNS got the NS twitter when Julia doesn't give a shit about NS? LOL. It was a front for Bravo; when that fell through, so did their collective interest. She is only and has only ever been concerned about THE JULIA BRAND. She found a way to get @julia but @nonsociety (what would they even use it for) didn't matter and really never will. If it ever even did she'd at least have made a faux stink to get more attention. The silence about it doesn't necessarily mean there's a connection.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Um, if she were RBNS you might think she would have just held on to her Question of the Day wall on her NS page. Disappointed that some people on here -- newbies and otherwise -- are acting like idiots tonight. I think it's true that Julia's agent tipped Page Six about Jay Cutler, but to suggest that Jacy is Julia only shows that you are obviously just tuning into the show.

    ReplyDelete
  113. I thought Scary Mary started this blog but then gave it up when she thought she and Julia were going to be chums? Remember? Right after that IM chat she posted and she realized Julia had no use for her, then suddenly RBNS came back and posted again?

    ReplyDelete
  114. @10:44

    Whoa, my neck just snapped from the spin machine. Your argument is basically that it was impossible for Julia not to get the nonsociety screen name at twitter? How does that hold? Hell, even cnn didn't have the cnnbrk screen name at twitter. Ya, Julia is more brilliant than CNN. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  115. 10:18 -- hallelujah!

    ReplyDelete
  116. Me thinks the named commenters have gone under.

    Hmmmmm,

    ReplyDelete
  117. The reblog is coming from ... inside the house!

    ReplyDelete
  118. 10:18 --Yallelujah

    Cause you have to have a fucking brain to stay on a slam site all nite long with rules about only hating one person.

    Wow.Just.Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  119. you thinks too simply.

    ReplyDelete
  120. 10:51

    that's what she [auntie em] said...

    and the house is julia.

    ReplyDelete
  121. 10:54

    Yeah, nice name.

    ReplyDelete
  122. Holy shit, 10:53 must 10:18's IP addresses and is now outside his/her window. 10:18.... RUN. I mean... all night? Ya sure there hunnybunny?

    ReplyDelete
  123. Listen up Julia Allison asshat minions, you're disinformation campaign failed. You should have realized the massive number of holes in it before you launched it. Furthermore, the overwhelming number of new, non-registered handles is a statistical giveaway. One day soon, Julia will take a giant dump on you, so you might as well stop defending her and save a little bit of dignity.

    ReplyDelete
  124. ::brushes off shoulders:: thanks, my parents actually did name me anonymous. Dick.

    ReplyDelete
  125. My understanding is that Anna Wintour = Jacy.

    ReplyDelete
  126. Paris Hilton = Jacy

    ReplyDelete
  127. 10:49 Your argument presupposes that julia does not care about NS, I believe she does, not as much as she cares about herself, but nevertheless, she is concerned with NS. Do not confuse bad decisions and an immature outlook for 'not caring'

    10:50

    Qotd was too ugly to leave on a site that they used to make their pitches...hence, a blog that doesn't have advertisers, a place to contain the haters...she can even use it to argue her tired ass story about women and the internet.

    as mary would say...BAM
    I'll take these both:

    ReplyDelete
  128. I think it's interesting how overly defensive the Jacy is not Julia comments are. Swearing and overreacting when something stops going her way, who does that remind me of, hmmmm?

    And, please, there are plenty of unflattering Julia photos out there already without this blog. There's also nothing on this blog particularly harmful to chubs. Everything is copper from her very own lfecast. Like when those crazy "I'm a fatty" videos came out and 'Jacy' posted/commented on them before most would be awake let alone parsing Jackles blog.

    I believe!!!

    ReplyDelete
  129. Don't stop believin. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

    ReplyDelete
  130. 10:56

    Who the fuck is defending the bat-shit crazy bitch?

    Saying she is behind this is kind of the opposite of defending her.

    disinformation campaign? This is the internet and my IP address is not in Bhutan.

    ReplyDelete
  131. We'll see how much she cares when NS ceases to exist and the Toolia brand marches on with nary a mention of the old business. Blaaaaah blaaaaaaah blahhhhhh.

    ReplyDelete
  132. Is not 11:02 the 2nd a defense my dear 11:05 the 2nd? I will believe as soon as you explain the Charlsie blog. It was so harmless, yet smacked down.

    ReplyDelete
  133. Yeah, but charlsie was supposed to be an intern, not a blogger.

    It seems to me that julia would hate someone that grunted for her having an outlet that was her pissing ground. julia loves her some internet, it does not even matter that c. wrote insignificant stuff, it is still a betrayal on the most simplistic level. Plus, it is a way for julia to lord her power over someone, isn't that what she thinks interns are for?

    ReplyDelete
  134. hi, 1102 the 2nd here. What are you talking about? I'm not defending Julia, I've loathed her fat stupid ass since I met her years ago. I'm saying I do think she's behind this site because she's a crazy fameball rapidly loosing speed

    Charlize - that's easy - it wasn't controlled by J so she shot it down. She controls this so it doesn't make her nervous.

    ReplyDelete
  135. @11:18

    OK, but what better way to "lord her power over someone" than to tell Charlsie what to write about in her blog? Why sneak around Charlsie and have David Karp take it out? Why not just tell Charlsie to stop?

    ReplyDelete
  136. Julia is also Loren Feldman. She is...the world. But we already knew that.

    ReplyDelete
  137. @11:21

    Ya, but she clearly does not control this site. If she did, why would she post the Davos private jet photos on her blog, take them down, and then repost them here? Why even post them in the first place if she didn't want trouble, and, if she did want trouble, why not keep them on her primary blog?

    ReplyDelete
  138. I find this interesting...

    I have seen comments that were shouted down for not being 'on topic' people were called SM for a month if they disagreed or made arguments of their own.

    well, just how many times can you call her fat, not-well dressed, chemically enhanced, argue about whether her pictures are photo-shopped?

    and the redundancy of it all really does mirror julia

    ReplyDelete
  139. Snowflake - Jacy

    ReplyDelete
  140. Julia's Bray,

    Actually, some of the disinformation commenters are from Meghan's family. How did that age discrimination lawsuit work out?

    ReplyDelete
  141. Pissing ground? The fuck? Charlsie was detailing what she was doing as an intern at NS as part of her credit requirements. That she was essentially being assigned tasks more fit for a PAID personal assistant isn't her fault. At the end of the day it looked like the interns were hired to do dirty work they shouldn't have been doing in the first place; pushing on PR companies and others for free stuff constantly, returning clothing and accessories for people who aren't even at any particular level to have that kind of cachet. What the hell were they doing all day that made them so freakin' busy they couldn't carry out any of these tasks themselves? My bad, they're too good to do any of these things, too entitled to actually work at something, and just too exhausted what with the extreme schedules they have. Not. Consider it seriously. Meghan can afford to buy whatever it is she needs or wants. Mary ran a somewhat successful handbag biz and had connects, but is also pro enough to be able to wrangle things herself and has some access to money. Julia only had the TONY column to her credit during Charlsie's internship, I believe. And really, Julia asking for free stuff for herself.. would you see that happening ever? No, that's what the interns are used for. It's a way of making oneself and a business appear more important and relevant than it actually is, and to get away from doing the "icky" stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  142. Lawsuit? What? Deets plz.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Re: Are you Jacy?
    ...
    [Chat now] Julia Allison julia@nonsociety.com
    ...
    View
    To:Kate Jabs totaljing@yahoo.com


    huh?

    I won't even click on that site.


    On Apr 30, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Kate Jabs wrote:

    Do write for RBNS?

    ReplyDelete
  144. Good god, you conspiracy theorists. For people who parse every element of Julia's being, your warped fantasy that Jacy is Julia is so fucking off base.

    Christ, look at Julia's track record. Yes, she likes attention. But she's also proven herself to be a raging control freak when it comes to her own self-image. Haven't we been over this, the way she's sent into a tailspin ever time a negative word or an unflattering picture is posted without her approval? The way she censors her environment? You seriously think... I mean you seriously fucking think she could stand for a site like this to exist without exerting control over her own image?

    I mean, christ... I'm no fan of the girl and even I wince at the nastiness of some of the comments. There's no fucking way this control freak would blithely smile on as commenters rant and rave about her waist size thinking it all falls into her grand masterplan of... what exactly? More traffic?

    She's displayed a clear history of demanding attention, but attention she meticulously manufactures and controls. Not some anarchist rant space. That's not her style. Her style is taking a sniper rifle and picking off her critics, one by one. Failing that, she woos them with false kindness. (Don't need to go too far back in history to see multiple examples of this.)

    So I don't know about the rest of you, but it's really fucking obvious to me that this batshit theory of Jacy=Julia is a thousand times more likely to be coming from the Julia camp to manipulate the weaker minded among us. Because since the coffee offer didn't work, and because she's enjoying a shitstorm at the moment, she's probably no longer in the mood for false niceties and far prefers to create chaos among the people who drive her insane.

    So cut this shit out. Stop with these bullshit accusations that Jacy's Julia, or Christan's whatever, or that Reblogging Nonsociety started when Nonsociety hit a downtick, and all that shit. Because if you're so anti-Julia and consider yourself any sort of critical observer, then you've really fucking failed.

    ReplyDelete
  145. 11:18

    Julia didn't sneak, hell, she probably leaked it to gawker, plus, she most likely knew she could not 'control' c.'s blog. What better way to stop then pull the rug out?

    11:26

    Davos pictures....she posted them the first time cause she wanted to...she knew she wasn't supposed to, she takes them down, [shows remorse, pretends to have made an innocent mistake....but then it shows up on the site that hates her....she's sorry, honest, it won't happen again, tell your wife I'm sorry too....

    ReplyDelete
  146. Thaaaaaaaank yooooooooooooooooooooou 11:36.
    I'm shocked anyone would believe she'd do something like this when she made a huge deal over a freakin WIKIPEDIA photo that wasn't even that bad! Plus the Charlsie blog and killing off many of the tumblrs around that time, then crowing about being happy about it. Like, come on.

    ReplyDelete
  147. FormerGawkerEmployeeApril 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM

    You keen intellectuals are right. Jacy IS Julia! And you don't want to give Julia any more attention or page views or fame, do you? No. So leave! Otherwise you're just pawns in her master chess game. Go on! Get out of here!

    ReplyDelete
  148. Hey 11:36 --ChristanApril 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM

    This, I completely agree with:


    "She's displayed a clear history of demanding attention, but attention she meticulously manufactures and controls."

    ReplyDelete
  149. Julia leaking Charlsie's blog to Gawker? Are you really, really sure about that? Odd that it disappeared without warning soon after, then.

    ReplyDelete
  150. Former Ass-hat

    Right off the old comment section of TMI--leave

    or should I say the rambo school of retorts...

    wow, you're dismissing us, uh, no thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  151. yup, the chick who freaks out and orders unflattering flickr photos down as soon as they appear is behind this blog. you know that shot of her looking like a hippo with her huge gaping maw wide open? it drives her fucking crazy every time it appears here. absolutely mental. but you know what? she's still not as crazy as the one troll who is actually behind all this bullshit tonight. put the bottle down, "hunny."

    ReplyDelete
  152. We're talking about the same c*** that got tumblr to take down blogs critical of her, right?

    ReplyDelete
  153. Plus the awkward pose when she was eating pizza with some girls at whatever school she was at (still wtfing @ that), retaking the picture with Meaghan at the MIT talk because she didn't like it (Meaghan said it was fine) and much older, her being on video having just taken a picture with someone and then saying "let's make sure nobody looks fat". She needs control and this site wouldn't be up her alley at. all.

    ReplyDelete
  154. 11:36PM the 2nd

    Weakness abounds. She likes to control interns but she can't so she launches an uncontrollable website so people can bash her even though the website she couldn't control wasn't really bashing her. You must have a PhD in masturbation. Either that or JA is basically very unstable and, when she announces this site was run by her, she will finally becoming completely radioactive to any potential sponsors and/or mates. I look forward to the day that happens.

    ReplyDelete
  155. Again, seems like she planted all her stories at gawker, my reasoning here...the commenters that I read and gravitated to for years have all left. [they're over at the awl now--great site] I pose the possibility that the julia planted stories was a big part of the flounce party--[yes, I know there were many changes with gawker, but the repeated "why are we reading about this banality" comments is yet another contest that julia has won.

    I do not so much believe that jacy = julia
    [tit for tat]
    but I do believe that she has more to do with this than most the people here know.



    which shines more light on her willingness to put up with a blog that contains her hate

    ReplyDelete
  156. whoa, her teeth were SO CUTE before the giant porcelain veneers:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/juliaallison/2132109788/sizes/l/in/photostream/

    and look at how her back ones are kind of yellowish. it's just so cute and natural, a world away from this mess:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/juliaallison/2337175774/sizes/l/

    ReplyDelete
  157. @11:34

    "On February 25, 2003, Mihir Parikh, our former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association against us, alleging breach of his employment agreement, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, discrimination based on age, race and national origin, fraud and deceit, defamation and violation of the California Labor Code. On March 4, 2003, Dr. Parikh resigned as a member of the Company's Board of Directors. On June 17, 2003, Dr. Parikh filed an amended demand for arbitration adding as respondents our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Stephen S. Schwartz, and three outside directors, Walter W. Wilson, Stanley J. Grubel and Anthony E. Santelli to all claims other than the breach of contract claim. Dr. Parikh seeks compensatory damages in excess of $2 million plus punitive damages and attorney's fees. We deny Dr. Parikh's allegations and intend to defend the action vigorously. The arbitration hearing is scheduled for early 2004."

    ReplyDelete
  158. To Jacy and the Magnificent Seven:

    Yes, you are right, this is a ridic theory that should not waste people's time from calling julia fat and poofy AGAIN...

    But this site keeps talking about her looks and then makes up bullshit theories about how she is living hand to mouth...

    uh, I don't think she is,

    AND I AM NOT DEFENDING HER but think about this...

    who likes it the best when you continue to talk about her....

    who likes it best when you give her 'new' crazy-ass ideas to blog a response to the haters...her no make-up heart to heart with the camera

    who likes it best when she can say to momsers and dadsers, yes, they are bad people that say bad things about me, but look at all the e-mails I get [and write] at non-society that tell me they love me!!!

    who is narcissistic enough to do this?

    ReplyDelete
  159. 1150 I agree with you. Hard to say exactly what julia is posting on this site but I'd bet a lot she's very involved. She has shown time and time again she is willing to sell herself out for any "press" she can recieve.

    And, no one has a reasonable arguement against it, besides that there are mildly less attractive pictures of her here. Please, she's wayyyyyy lower than that on the dignity pole by now.

    ReplyDelete
  160. 11:55

    are you linking to more pictures of julia...to change the subject?

    ReplyDelete
  161. 11:47

    "You must have a PhD in masturbation."

    So fucking julia...

    ReplyDelete
  162. Not narcissism. She's too insecure to be textbook. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorian_Gray_syndromeOh, and mayjah superiority complex.

    ReplyDelete
  163. 11:47

    "You must have a PhD in masturbation."

    So fucking julia...

    Just like smelley cat...this works on so many levels.

    ReplyDelete
  164. @12:12

    Yes, but one usually has an objective when seeking out press. What's Julia's objective? How does she profit from negative press? If it is just to feed her ego then why doesn't she just go on a giant crime spree? She would get tons of negative press that way. Or is she just insane and does not have a rational motive behind her actions?

    ReplyDelete
  165. where'd all the named commenters go?

    ReplyDelete
  166. Hey 12:22

    what 'good' press did her creator gawker bestoy upon her?

    ReplyDelete
  167. A bit lengthy, but good read. Note that she isn't Hollywood, not even close, yet exemplifies this in a huge way:

    "Red Carpet Syndrome: At the center of the pop-culture phenomena, the Red Carpet Syndrome is the nucleus of an “all eyes on me” society. Defined by an entitlement complex that is a by-product of a celebrity culture where individuals expect to be elevated to the center of attention at all times. It is, in essence, an addiction to validation where too much is never, ever enough. All of life becomes the red carpet and the expected code of behavior remains treating everyone else surrounding them as swag-fetching minions.


    What is going to be oh so very interesting with the advent of ever increasing technology and street level reporting... is watching these people get outed by their own Dorian Grey obsession with themselves. There are, in reality, a great many incredibly creative and extraordinary people in Hollywood--just like there is in the rest of the world. Yet, it is no accident that what goes on in this town is far and away a very accurate barometer of the heartbeat of humankind, as it reflects in the work it churns out. That being said, as people grow very weary of keeping up appearances and start to demand the truth be revealed everywhere, (which is actually the inevitable beauty of these times), it is certainly going to be fascinating to see these public figures end a very long charade and finally get real with a public they have been manipulating for so long.

    Great benefit could be derived from the words of Pablo Neruda, "My only obligation is this: to be transparent." The only thing a person in the spotlight ultimately owes the public, is honesty. Privacy is one thing, as everyone is unquestionably entitled to a personal life. Deception and hypocrisy, however, is a whole other animal, and a feral one at that.

    Because, as it turns out, many of these people have done their best acting when the cameras are off."


    http://generationinstantgratification.com/2009/04/06/the-red-carpet-syndrome/

    ReplyDelete
  168. Why would meghan shill for RBNS and say her mom reads it?

    ReplyDelete
  169. Jack Johnson is right,

    why are all the people that are always here, not weighing in on any of this?

    ReplyDelete
  170. DGS was on Milli Matchmaker! Jules should watch this, it IS a Bravo show after all. Hehe. :


    Dorian Gray Syndrome : Millionaire Matchmaker

    ReplyDelete
  171. BOTTOM LINE: It doesn't matter if Jacy = Julia or not. RBNS exists and it rips JA a new one everyday. Furthermore, unique hits are down on NonSociety and JA's career is at its lowest point ever. Conclusion, RBNS is not helping JA in any material way.

    ReplyDelete
  172. "Why would meghan shill for RBNS and say her mom reads it?"

    I dunno -- also, why would Meghan and her mom call their stage act The Aristocrats? Don't they? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  173. I'm here. Laughing. I'm not wasting my time writing anything thoughtful in response. The troll can fit itself through the night if it wants, I'm going to bed!

    ReplyDelete
  174. They have work in the morning? The sheer ludicrousness of the notion is obv pretty silly to argue? They don't care? Gosh, so many possible answers. I smell another theory a'comin.

    ReplyDelete
  175. I drink more than party pantsMay 1, 2009 at 12:48 AM

    again, months of posts on this site,

    should we look at how early people go to sleep or stop caring on a thursday night?

    ludicousness indeed

    ReplyDelete
  176. Jing

    ca'mon you're a pro, right,

    The troll can fit itself through the night if it wants, I'm going to bed!

    'can fit itself through the night'???

    ReplyDelete
  177. "Conclusion, RBNS is not helping JA in any material way."

    As a containment site, it's not supposed to.

    As a purpose for her arguement that the internet is a tough place for the ladies [which she is right?] this place and the magnificent seven are fabulous.

    ReplyDelete
  178. Lulzzzzzzzz you guys are fucking insane tonight. I LOVE THIS BLOG. <3333333333

    ReplyDelete
  179. ^Sausage Snappers

    ReplyDelete
  180. Yeah, checked it, last week on three diff days

    comments by flatface, partypants, tj, form gawk
    and yeah, after 12:00 [midnight]

    and that was just last week....

    this week is soooooo different

    ReplyDelete
  181. Anonymous cuz I got the e-mailMay 1, 2009 at 1:06 AM

    Jacy

    Seriously, put an end to this with a picture of
    you and the magnificent seven!

    Night Night all...

    I leave you with the undeniable phrase of our fearless [but well paid] leader: Jacy

    Carry On!

    ReplyDelete
  182. It's sad you really went and looked that up 1:03. BUT, K!

    ReplyDelete
  183. Yah they totally can't go to sleep early on any random day of the week. Because you see they've posted later than midnight on different days and multiple times! Also, you know.. people go to sleep at the same time every night! Also, those other reasons you provided may not be arguable or able to be validated, so the "work in the morning" argument is one that will be harped on. DUH!!!!!

    <--/sarcasmo>

    ReplyDelete
  184. Hey 1:09

    Cause it's not sad that you would rather call julia fat and poofy for the 6788th time....

    I mean she is but....

    ReplyDelete
  185. and the 'K' totes gives you away Anon 1:09

    ReplyDelete
  186. Ryan Tate just explained that he used julia's picture of her and rachel sklar cause there weren't ANY other pictures available....

    but rachel is not her friend, and gawker [she is actually on there twice tonight] is not her dr frankenstein.

    ReplyDelete
  187. and uhm, she hates negative press.

    ReplyDelete
  188. I decided to stay anonymous but I would like to thank this site for opening my eyes. I'm glad I found it googling Julia's name.

    I am a marketing director of a large cosmetics company and we're launching a social media campaign. I was considering sponsoring Julia Allison, as one of the main women involved, I thought she had many fans. She does indeed but the online negativity regarding her is just too overwhelming. I would be afraid the negative image could spill on our brand.

    I decided to consider someone new, eventhough Julia, a very pretty woman would have been perfect for the campaign.

    A very eye-opening site.

    ReplyDelete
  189. Gives who away as what? I've never called Julia fat OR poofy. Please enlighten me 1:18/1:19 as to who I am - sorry, who you believe me to be - so I can get a giggle at your shortsighted expense. Thanks! :)

    ReplyDelete
  190. 2:47 your anti-semitism is trite, lame and boring. Looking forward to not seeing you soon.

    ReplyDelete
  191. Wow, heavy witch traffic here during Walpurgis Night and I slept through all this again. FML.

    Moving on to this Twitter beauty:

    # OMG. Just ran into Anna Wintour in ladies room - alone! - @ National Magazine Awards. She smiled at me!about 9 hours ago from txt

    That's the same strategy I use when encountering stray dogs on the street. Stay calm and friendly and back away slowly in order to not provoke an attack.

    ReplyDelete
  192. Pretty sure that Alana Joy is Scary Mary.

    ReplyDelete
  193. And another Anonymous is pretty sure I am Jillyboos third cousin something something. Oh please, even if I were, like I would EVER admit to being related to that gorgon.

    ReplyDelete
  194. I'm still not over the fact that I always miss the open buffet around here. Precious tossed salads and scrambled eggs all over the place, but I'm sure they'll be calling again.

    Partypants, I find the idea of RBNS as a family venture of a retarded clan oddly intriguing (retarded because of the sheer idiocy that would include regarding this as a useful publicity tool complementing nonsociety).

    ReplyDelete
  195. This thread is the reason RBNS should always have comments. Oh my god, you people think too much! Love it.

    ReplyDelete