Saturday, April 25, 2009

Julia: Still Blogging!


With the darling CD (my college roommate junior & senior year) at GOTO Boston’s Spring Charity Gala last night. I’m staying at her place in Back Bay while I’m in Boston. :)

BTW, I’m wearing a dress by Alice + Olivia, which made me feel like a princess, although more than one person at the lounge we went to afterwards asked me if I was “a bride.” Ummm … no.

I might be crazy, but I could swear this one was back-dated. We checked in earlier this morning and it wasn't up. I guess she doesn't want to draw attention to the fact that despite her promise to be offline all weekend, she is still blogging and Tweeting up a storm.

(UPDATE:
I stand corrected. I thought they said a.m., not p.m. Oh dear. Too much vodka with RussianGirl last night. But I thought SHE WASN'T BLOGGING THIS WEEKEND?)

And Jackles looks like Old Jackles here. Odd.

66 comments:

  1. Remember the hiatus she took from posting current pics? Maybe she has been working out and actually staying away from the cupcakes?

    Too Much Credit?

    ReplyDelete
  2. didn't she post these today at 1:22? What do you mean backpost...these were not there this morn.

    ReplyDelete
  3. But the Slanket shots from just a couple of days ago don't look like this. I say she either suffers from terrible water retention that makes her bloat badly or she has touched up this photo somehow. But don't know if it's possible to make yourself look 10 pounds lighter with Photoshop.

    Also, she looks SO MUCH better when she wears her hair down and not in that ridiculous bobby-pinned mullet she's been sporting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think everybody looks fat and bloaty in a slanket.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah, this looks like JA a year ago.

    PS Love the jpeg name (Bridezilla).

    --Guy

    ReplyDelete
  6. All it takes is a few days of starving yourself. NBD.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Also, she looks like one of the tables behind her.

    --Guy

    ReplyDelete
  8. Julia does look good in this photo, but I'm wondering if it's due to the crone she's standing next to? If CD is her college roommate, shouldn't she be in her late 20s too? Why does she look a good decade older? She looks like a 40-something suburban mom living it up on the one night she's allowed out for the year. Women must age in dog years in Boston.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The woman next to her was her room mate in college? Jesus. She looks about 40. What the hell did that one do to her face?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Her extensions hide the side-face bloat, she's wearing lots of makeup, the dress cut is a drop waist which forgives midsection/hips/thighs from looking fat and her arms are still poofy- look at the other pics.

    ReplyDelete
  11. what did they do take the coke/herion diet challenge?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I must be in the minority, as I thought CD was the beauty in this picture. Kind of a fake vs. natural thing.

    I also account for the fact that Julia chooses which pictures to put up and the only concern is how Julia looks.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Looking cheap and desperate as always.

    Poor thing.

    ReplyDelete
  14. And please, Julia, retire the "pose." It's so 2000.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ok, lets start talking about how many times she can call CD her college roommate. 5 photos in a row, each time stating their college connection. I don't get it. Is she getting paid every time she writes "college" "roommate" and "HBS"?

    ReplyDelete
  16. She didn't necessarily say the offline trip was this one. She just said she was taking one. Possibly a case of poor writing rather than poor self-control this time?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anon3:00: We got our hopes up, thinking she meant this weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  18. CD has eyes like a movie star. Serious here, I think she's very pretty.

    ReplyDelete
  19. http://julia.nonsociety.com/lifecast/100043437-0-8

    The bar is called "Clink" not "Click." Not that there is a giant sign or anything.

    http://www.libertyhotel.com/food_and_drink/clink.html

    ReplyDelete
  20. note how far away she is from the camera

    ReplyDelete
  21. Jacy, if JA didn't post, what would you do with your pathetic life?

    Oh wait. Go and scour the archives. A full life you live, sweetie.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Are you kidding? As if Jackles would take a break this weekend and miss the opportunity to talk about all the HBS boys she's around or to exploit CD... you guys give her too much credit.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anon3:12: Fuller than you know, dickwad.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm Anon 3:13... CD= cancer dan, not her middle aged ex roommate

    ReplyDelete
  25. Longtime RBNS TipsterApril 25, 2009 at 3:23 PM

    How stupid are the random nasty Anons that are too stupid to have figured out yet that there are several people behind this blog? So every time they're taking a shot at "Jacy" or "Russian Girl" or whoever else, they're taking a shot at about a half-dozen various posters.

    Lame.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Oh yeah, Jacy? Please. Explain to me, if your life is so full why do you spend time basically using RBNS as an outlet for you hatred of someone you don't even know. It's weird.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anon 3:24:

    Not to speak for Jacy, but....did you consider the possibility that it's all kinds of silly fun????

    ReplyDelete
  28. You can totally Photoshop yourself to be skinner. Just make the width of the photo smaller, without constraining the height at the same time. A well known trick :P

    ReplyDelete
  29. There is silly fun and there is hate.

    Silly fun addictinggames.com

    rbns is hate.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anon3:42: Why would you assume Jacy doesn't know Jackles? I have always assumed this blog is the product of a number of people in Jackles's social sphere who know her very well. Someone suggested Rachel Sklar might be involved; I wouldn't be at all surprised. JA has made lots and lots of enemies here in NYC.

    ReplyDelete
  31. You have to wonder about someone who spends a ton of time on a hate blog complaining that it's a hate blog and calling the people who read it/participate in it losers. If we're all losers, what does that make the person on here who hates us/hates RBNS and yet is still checking in constantly? Who doesn't have a life?

    ReplyDelete
  32. It's weird how someone who contributes regularly to a snark blog gets so defensive when someone criticizes them. It's almost like that saying. Something something dish it out something can't take it.

    And look! Both Jacy and The Anonymous Tipster were reading and on this blog in the same 30 minute time period. Is Anonymous tipster on of the 4 IPs from Houston that magically appeared when "Mary" was writing her comments? Let's hope so or else Jacy will have egg all over her face for falling for that trick.

    A half a dozen various posters? Try one or maybe two. Dozens of tipsters? Nobody is tipping this blog anymore for the same reason Owen Thomas doesn't cite RBNS as a source. This isn't a valid resource. Linking to it lowers the journalist's credibility. It's one step above a god damn slam book. Not that there's anything wrong with adults writing in a slam book. Just let's stop getting all indignant when people call you out for it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. That photo has been shopped. She's 6 feet away from the wall, but throwing a "shadow" that is her reshaped arm and left side. Also, look at the light source on the floor behind her and you'll see the shadow is impossible.

    ReplyDelete
  34. "You can dish it out but you can not take it"

    This is just ridiculous silly fun. All of it.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I am just a lonely housewife in Missouri and in between churning butter and milking cows and home-schooling my children, I come on here to blog about someone prettier and more exciting than me because I am profoundly jealous, that's all.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anon 3:45--Lighten the fuck up. Julia Baugher is the biggest fraud on the Internet, and this site is just for shits and giggles at the expense of a dissembling sociopath. Most of us who post here have known or know said sociopath in some capacity, so it's a fun way to vent. I don't take it all that seriously and don't even have time to stop in everyday. As for gawker never citing RBNS, get real! That's only because they need to hold onto their dwindling page views and don't want readers coming over here to diss the trainwreck they helped to create.

    ReplyDelete
  37. FormerGawkerEmployeeApril 25, 2009 at 4:16 PM

    Gawker monitors this site regularly. They often get ideas for posts from here. This latest Anon is just another humorless asshat.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Wired magazine is now offering a one-year subscription for $3.90. The withering touch of Julia Allison has struck again.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Did these gals go through Willy Wonka's taffy-pulling machine? Why do they appear to be over 6 feet tall?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Gawker is not able to comment on the mess they created honestly. We can be honest here. I would not be surprised if people near and dear to that dumb box are venting as well!

    ReplyDelete
  41. I think that CD is lovely, as well. I find it interesting that Jules chose to post this photo. Flabby triceps (a.k.a. "bat wings") are a woman's nightmare. I'm sure that CD's arms are toned (she's a slim woman, after all) but in this pic? She def. looks like she has some mighty flabby guns. In fact, it was the first thing I noticed when I looked at this pic...like, 'yikes'.And yet, her "friend" chose to post this picture, even to photoshop her own arms/torso to look thinner.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Really, let's examine telling people to lighten the fuck up when you're throwing around phrases like "dissembling sociopath." Yeah, that's light fare for ya.

    I find this blog a fun distraction. But let's call a spade a spade. We're all adults in our late twenties to late thirties visiting and commenting on a snark blog. We left the high road back a long ways ago. Some people are gonna find the repetitive and spiteful nature of certain posters offensive and annoying. That doesn't mean they find the blog itself offensive and annoying.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Bret Easton EllisApril 25, 2009 at 5:09 PM

    If you can't chuckle at a dissembling sociopath, what CAN you chuckle at? Bwa ha ha!

    ReplyDelete
  44. BEE: good one :)
    that doesn't solve the problem where to put american psycho in my bookshelf though, because i'm afraid it might scare some of the other books. off topic and strange? for sure, but i'm still grieving over having missed bizarro night. i always wanted to get to know björk a little better.

    ReplyDelete
  45. ironic slanket:

    Night of the Dueling Crazytrains was truly one for the ages.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Just checking into my new favourite site. Thanks to all who left kind words last night. For those of you who ask, I do not know Björk, but sometimes we think there should be a sign at the airport telling tourists if she is 'in' or not.

    I feel better today and would like to say that JA looks much better in that above photo. I do not understand at all how she changes so fast, but I still think she is extremely beautiful. But I also worry that she may be not eating, or visiting the toilets soon after eting, if you catch my idea!

    Good night and god bless
    UKPrincess

    ReplyDelete
  47. this isn't photoshop, this is black magic. how the hell did she transform into the old JA?! dare i say...she looks good!?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Please go home Julia. Boston's a happier place without you. So glad I wasn't at Clink last night.

    ReplyDelete
  49. You guys do realize half of her body is hidden behind Audio Disk?!

    Also, I don't like the dress. It's fine until you get to the bottom, but once you're there? As the mayor of Nightgown Town, I would like to welcome you!

    ReplyDelete
  50. What's Audio Disk?

    ReplyDelete
  51. It's one of those round silver things that you put in your stereo and music comes out. But that's not important right now.

    ReplyDelete
  52. I agree with Anon 3:57 that this image is photoshopped. Check out the shadow at JA's elbow.

    ReplyDelete
  53. http://julia.nonsociety.com/lifecast/99906900-0-20

    Sorry Ya'll. I think she's just skinny again. Doesn't it just EAT you alive ;)

    ReplyDelete
  54. TrollyHOOOO, umm...no not really. mainly because i'm pretty sure she didn't get thin in a healthy or sensible way. if anything she's probably going to gain the weight back and then some.

    ReplyDelete
  55. 6:26 Extremely beautiful? Flatface, over-bite and joker-sized mouth covered in an inch of pancake mix - not attractive.

    ReplyDelete
  56. TrollyHOOOO:

    Uh, the other woman in that picture is the same one in the picture above...notice anything different about her?

    ReplyDelete
  57. Something was done to the other woman's face. What the hell is going on with her eye's in those photos?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Agreed on the photoshopping. Not just the shadow - check out the dark penumbra around the left (our perception) of her arm. You can see what was cut out.

    She doesn't need to PS herself, but funny how she only PS'ed herself.

    ReplyDelete
  59. 9:09 - What's different about the woman in this picture?

    ReplyDelete
  60. Jacy, ban Captain America. His snide comments are unneeded.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Oh boy, her ratty, ratty extensions are back!

    Man, I have to say I feel so bad for whatever man she brings home. Who wants to run their hands through their "cute" girls hair only to find it's all FAKE and sewn into her head?

    Botox, nose job, fake tits, pancake makeup, extensions. She's a fake, a liar, and a fraud. No wonder no quality men will touch her with a 10-foot pole.

    ReplyDelete
  62. from her blog:
    "And later, a visit to the harvard final club!"

    She's such a n00b. Most people call it Finals club....and there definitely IS more than one of them, not ONE. Stop posing julia.

    also, her pics of MIT were pretty lame: 1) a back of a dorm from OFF campus 2) picture of some building most people at MIT never visit/know about 3) the inside of one of the athletic centers. living differently, alright. living cluelessly.

    ReplyDelete
  63. nuts, balls, scrotum,, you are

    ReplyDelete
  64. Blergh indeed she went to Herrell's and couldn't even spell the name right on her blog. That's some damn good ice cream btw.

    ReplyDelete
  65. why does there appear to be insane amounts of shading in julia's popped arm? am I imagining? click through to the bigger pic to see what I mean.

    ReplyDelete