Hi everyone! What's been going on in here tonight? Anything? No? Me? I've just been hanging around the cafeteria with Regina and Gretchen and the gang, boning up on Web celebrities whose names contain the letter V and concocting further diabolical censorship plans.I think I must be drinking whatever everyone else is drinking tonight because I actually like this outfit. Shoes are not great, but the dress is cute and so is the little demi-blouse.
I really like that outfit too.
ReplyDeleteThis is an excellent example of how opinions differ, because I hated this one. In that other photo (with the three of them on the couch) the outfit wasn't flattering at all, in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteI, too, am a fan of this ensemble.
ReplyDeleteIt looks kind of June Carter Cash, in a good way.
11:12
ReplyDeleteI just checked that photo out. It's definitely more flattering when standing. The wide waist band is hard to carry off when seated.
Well-played, Jacy.
ReplyDeleteOMG - dead wrong in my book. That outfit is atrocious. Skirts pulled up that high don't look great unless they are more fitted through the bodice, and it looks wrinkled. I think she looks dumpy.
ReplyDeleteI think the major difference between the outfit pictured seated, and that pictured standing, is the bow. Sitting, the bow is...ummm, of the bow persuasion, but standing, it's loose.
ReplyDeleteI think the line of the loose ribbon is elongating and flattering. I would wear this.
I just find it refreshing not to see the push-up bra-enhanced hooters in our faces for a change.
ReplyDeleteIs it a skirt pushed up or a dress with some kind of mom-blouse over it? I guess the blouse is my main problem, although unlike most of her outfits I sort of see what she was going for.
ReplyDeleteThis is an example of a grown up feminine/girly ensemble. I wish she'd go more in this direction. Also, no head band!
ReplyDeletehttp://julia.nonsociety.com/post_images/NB8YioMLim586igu8OhA5ISFo1_500.jpg
ReplyDeleteIs it just me, or does Mary look like Sarah Connor (as played by Linda Hamilton) in this shot? Look out JA-1000!
I'm reposting this because I think it got lost amid all the hubub in the last thread:
ReplyDeleteMary's mom is selling this Dries Van Noten dress as "never worn". http://designeraccessoriesforless.tumblr.com/post/89939547/left-to-right-balenciaga-size-small-125
Weird. This must be a different dress Mary wore at their latest TMI taping: http://julia.nonsociety.com/lifecast/95043524-0-2
I think borrowing a dress for a taping might still make it considered "never worn" but I'm not sure.
ReplyDeleteSaying its "never worn" after Mary has worn it for a day to tape TMI seems like a blatant lie to me if we're using the plain meaning of the words.
ReplyDeleteMaybe there's some different meaning in the resale industry that I'm not aware of.
The green top Megan is wearing in that photo is also being sold as "never worn"
ReplyDeletehttp://designeraccessoriesforless.tumblr.com/post/89939426/left-to-right-john-galliano-size-2-390
Perfect example of an "outfit" women find attractive, but reminds men of their grandmothers.
ReplyDeleteI disagree. This outfit is wrong wrong wrong. The colors are so off for her skin tone. Particularly the top, which she tried (mistakenly) to match to her skirt and the combination is completely washing her out. There's also the issue of the print, which is hard enough to pull off in real life, and nearly impossible to pull off on camera.
ReplyDeleteGrade: C-
The outfit JA is wearing can also be found on Mary's mother's site: http://designeraccessoriesforless.tumblr.com/post/89939426/left-to-right-john-galliano-size-2-390
ReplyDeleteIt's a Size 10 DVF
Ugh. No. I do not like JA's outfit at all. I'm usually a fan of a 1950's style, as long as it has a sexy/sassy edge to it. JA's outfit looks like she's waiting for her dear husband to arrive home so can she mix a martini for him and then they can passive aggressively insult each other.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I hope she's getting some sleep. It's the number one beauty aid, and not just in one night doses! I think we should start a JA help fund to send her off to an ashram for a month or something. She just looks worn out.
Actually the blouse she's wearing is the galliano, size two. The DVF is the wrap top, green in the middle, and meghan must have "clipped" it with clothes pins in the back which is normal for TV.
ReplyDeleteIt was more Heathers than Mean Girls. Sharp and cutting, and more than a little spot on.
ReplyDeleteWhen the commenters start to resemble the object of the site's derision, there will be feedback.
And Jacy, I know you see it, too. That is why your name is one the sidebar and certain aspiring commenters' names aren't.
drop. it.
ReplyDeleteuuugh. no no no. i don't like this outfit AT ALL. the skirt isn't soo bad. it's the top i can't stand. way too busy and flowy for her figure. but at least she's a bit more covered up top.
ReplyDeletemmmm nope...xoxo otherwise
ReplyDeleteAnon 1:06: zzzzzz. Snoozefest. No one cares.
ReplyDeleteSo...this is how you respond to criticism that you suck at running this hate site? Posting about how much you like the outfit of the object of hate? Cuts to the quick!
ReplyDeleteWeirdly, I know someone at Google, and they told me that people do care and want me to keep rattling the cage on this.
ReplyDeleteSee how stupid that sounds?
The last thing you want to do with big hips/lower half is accentuate with a skirt like this. Not a fan.
ReplyDeleteWhy don't you fucking losers pick handles for yourselves so we know which one of you are deciding to be demented losers again today?
ReplyDeleteBetter yet, take a page from RBNS and start up a blog pissing all over this blog. You'll spare all the rest of us the tedium of your existences.
FGE -- indeed, it would be nice to sort out which one is Nitwit A and which one is Nitwit B. For now they are blending together a little too much. The affect would be much better if we could differentiate which Nitwit was which.
ReplyDeleteFormerGawk, I'm sure you recognize some of the trolls.
ReplyDeleteI do. It's not hard to recognize the elitist tone.
ReplyDeleteI didn't like this outfit, but I did like the blue dress she was wearing.
ReplyDeleteBut I thought it was only one troll! And it was Julia!
ReplyDeleteNo, there are lots of trolls....
ReplyDeletetrolls named anonymous!
loved Former Gawker's advice to identify ourselves,
hmmm, from Gawker to rbns...yeah.
Do you actually think Alex Balk or someone who wrote for Gawker is here? It's probably a sad little ad sales wannabe, if he even worked at Gawker at all.
ReplyDeleteAh, conceit expressed against the insignificant little people. Only "on air" personal counts? So refreshing and telling. Keep it classy.
ReplyDeleteNick Denton doesn't want Gawker covering her anymore unless it's to ruthlessly mock her. Where else do you suppose they're getting their fix? Baugher and here.
ReplyDeleteMock this site all you like, but people like Sklar, Sorgatz and Gould are involved. I just haven't determined yet whether they're actually writing it or tipping it.
Hahaha. Yeah, right. I don't care for any of those people, but there's no way they're writing it. They all have some editorial experience. As for tipping: what was the last "insider" news you heard here?
ReplyDeleteIt's a site meant to mock and ridicule her, that's all. There is no interest by the people running it in airing all the dirt. There is a ridiculous amount of dirt, but they are content in the knowledge that she will get it all out there herself, and then the mocking begins. Because she will. She's already working on a major scam to get herself more attention.
ReplyDeleteThere is a lot of dirt and a lot of confirmed tips. Tips are frequently turned down with grace and thanks by the writers of this site because they don't want to ruin the reputations nor embarrass many of the "associates" that would have to be named in order to tell those stories. Get it?
ReplyDelete*I do not write for this site but I have tipped. And what I posted above is a summary of what I was told in response.