Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Yulia: How is last summer 8 million years ago?


My heart literally started pounding when I saw this … um, yes, that would be nerves, thankyouverymuch.

Yes, she speak at the school where her brother go (and where he no doubt go screaming into night). Yes, she bring up magazine cover for bazillionth time (even though someone else do the invite, whatevs).

Stiil.

This. Happen. Two. Weeks. Ago.

DOES SHE NOT THINK THEY ARE GOING TO FIGURE OUT THE BAIT AND THE SWITCH?????

P.S. My poor slow cousin Bogdan has gouged eyes out with fork used for determining weather because he saw Easter photos of Yulia by accident. I not understand this person who put the cupcakes in her mouth.

Update! I not saying she fat. I saying she nuts. Just for clarificashe.

89 comments:

  1. I'm saying she's fat. Christ what a porker!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Julia is to _____________ as Mary is to _____________.

    (a) dating : fashion
    (b) laziness : diligence
    (c) spelling : speling
    (d) fatness : orange

    ReplyDelete
  3. (e) b, c, d and not a

    ReplyDelete
  4. That Wired cover literally looks nothing like her. You wouldn't even know it's her. Horny MIT boy are in for a big shock when she shows up with her busted, overly made-up face.

    ReplyDelete
  5. At MIT to explain social media???? Really... That should be interesting. What could she possibly have to say after listing her tumblr and twitter accounts?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Seriously that cover looks nothing like her.

    ReplyDelete
  7. jesus christo! talk about lazy. russian girl, do some research before you write your posts. RBNS blows.

    Way to make me totally nervous to speak, MIT!! http://twitpic.com/3qbxc about 10 hours ago from web

    ReplyDelete
  8. What are you talking about, Anon8:14?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Julia Allison is a
    a) journalist who has been fired from all of her jobs
    b) TV commentator who is no longer on TV
    c) web entrepreneur for a failing "business" with no clear mission, vision, plan or purpose
    d) former new media personality, who no one pays attention to any longer
    e) co-founder of nonsociety.com, the most boring blog on the web
    f) all of the above

    Answer: F

    ReplyDelete
  10. Jacy, I am assuming Anon was too much of a bonehead to realize Russian Girl was reblogging JA's blog, not her Twitter.

    http://julia.nonsociety.com/lifecast/98737407-0-1

    ReplyDelete
  11. journalist? no. tv commentator? not so much. web entrepreneur? lol. new media personality? uhhh. e. blah f. not quite

    Now you see how that works out, 8:14? That talk ought to be hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  12. it seems the only reason julia mentioned the cover on nonsociety is that someone tweeted her about it. julia allison is an idiot but come on.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 8:30: no, not a bonehead, thanks very much. see my response at 8:31.

    ReplyDelete
  14. So what? Why does that make it any less reblog-worthy? You've lost me.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wrong, anon 8:31. Julia Allison mentioned that Wired cover AGAIN because she has no other cultural currency left - and even the value of that cover is severely deflated because it was from about a year ago and gave her ZERO bounce. She has even less promise than she did a year ago. Julia Allison is on a serious downward slope into obscurity and it's absurd that she is still marketing herself as those A-F things listed above because she is NONE OF THOSE THINGS.

    ReplyDelete
  16. i never said anything about whether or not it was lame for her to post the cover and i agree that the cover has no value or importance to most people (although she probably could spin it in her favor to less intelligent but nonetheless powerful people). what i'm saying is that it's not like it was on her mind, someone else brought it to her attention in the context of her speaking at MIT (which, i can't imagine what insight she brings to such an engagement but, see what i previously said about being able to spin herself as relevant to less intelligent but nonetheless powerful people. and sadly, in the case of MIT, you'd think the people who arranged it were actually intelligent)

    ReplyDelete
  17. it's like your hatred of julia allison clouds basic reasoning skills.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think we can all agree that she peaked with that Wired cover. That was her apex and she keeps referring to it for the same reason the Prom Queen of the class of '92 keeps mentioning it: that was the height of her life and since then it's been nothing but disappointment, resentment, and thwarted dreams.

    ReplyDelete
  19. She chose to blog it, though, Anon. She could have ignored it, right? But no -- she saw another opportunity to run the cover shot. This is a woman who has a framed painting of herself hanging in her apartment and cried at her birthday party when someone did up a card based on a photo of her at her previous year's birthday party. Clue in.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Julia Allison can spin, spin, spin all she wants to, but the more she gets invited to speaking engagements under false pretenses, the more she proves to be a total and complete fraud as soon as she opens her mouth. Have you seen any video of her speaking in front of an audience? She is a total fool, spewing of an incoherent string of buzzwords, hmms, umms, and a bunch of nothing.

    And all of these speaking engagements are not organized by "powerful people." The MIT event is a student club and her speaking engagements in Europe were for obscure tech conferences. Notice how she NEVER gets asked to speak or present at events with any notoriety whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I guess my issue is you were stating RG was lazy and RBNS "blows" because she reblogged Jackles's blog post the way we always do. As Anon mentioned about, Jackles could have ignored the Tweet but she chose not to. Fair game, and I don't think it means RG is lazy.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anon 842, it's like your love of Julia Allison clouds your basic reasoning skills. I know of one person who likes to show up here and defend Julia and she's a Scary Sadshaw with a cupcake addiction, just like her idol Julia.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Aww comon, 8:50 Anon, cut you-know-who some slack. She's never done anything to anyone other than have a somewhat misguided affection for you-know-who-else.

    And they must've done some serious photoshop tricks to that magazine cover. JA's body and face look slim and abnormally stretched, especially those legs/cankles. Which is odd, because I found the rest of that Wired photoshoot somewhat unflattering to her. They shot her from strange angles and made her face look somewhat more tired and jowly.

    So. Sad. to look back on that magazine now though. She seemed to be on her way to bigger and better things with that cover and then? NOTHING. One long and ugly downward spiral ever since then.
    She'll keep trotting out that cover for the rest of her life just to remind herself and everyone else that she was hot and somewhat relevant once. Too bad she didn't wise up and court Playboy when she might've had a chance. Hef loves washed up aging hot chicks.

    ReplyDelete
  24. In a way the Wired cover contained one big truth, although they surely were not aware of it back then. Whenever I see this picture I am reminded of rock star groupies with a serious drug problem. At the end of the day she has never been anything else but a tech groupie with several problems. By now she is too deranged to even pass as groupie material and is left with, um, nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The question, in anticipatory horror and sympathy for the unsuspecting at MIT, is what horrendously inappropriate outfit will she wear!?
    Please don't let it be that red and black checked monstrosity (with a big stupid bow for crissake!) she bought at Forever 21. (It's waaayyy tooo short Julia ... please, don't wear it. And you're SO not "forever" 21, you look more like my trampy OLD stepmother.) And please please don't wear those tired grey over-the-knee $5 hooker boots. Not only are they just plain stupid, but they look like crap especially on you.
    It's all so embarrassing. I wish I was a guy.

    ReplyDelete
  26. -2- framed paintings bb, TWO.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anon @ 9:21 at least with women like her we always have pictorial evidence to show to people and say: And THAT is why we still need feminism (among about a million other reasons).

    ReplyDelete
  28. i had to look at it five times to realize this, but it's not just the wired cover, the MIT people have taken it and repurposed it as an invitation to their event, and THAT is what JAB posted on her blog (although it gave her another opportunity to bray about being on the cover of wired).

    ReplyDelete
  29. Julia Allison is like feminism never happened.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I wonder why they didn't go with the Easter hooker one...
    Seriously, doesn't this media professional give out publicity shots? I mean, that probably would have been the picture of her choice, but still.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Shouldn't she be at the gym in 26 minutes?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Julia Allsion is like feminism went on a bender, had a threesome with Barbie and Ken - assuming they had genitals - and spawned Julia Allison.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I can't find it now but there used to be a video in JA's vimeo stream that was Meghan filming her the very first time she saw the wired cover (or maybe it was the proof of the wired cover). I can't find it right now, but oh man, it was so good.

    She gets all excited and OMGicantbelieveitsme!!! and the reads the cover outloud. "(gleefully) Get internet famous! Even if you're a . . . . NOBODY! (bitter sarcasm) Even if you're a nobody, isn't that fucking great." She looks crestfallen, then realizes it, tries to ham up a smile for the camera, then the video ends about 2 seconds later. If anyone needs to kill time and can go find it, it really is quite a gem.

    ReplyDelete
  34. "I just got an email that said "The info's RIGHT HERE, jokers!" For some reason the "jokers" part made me cry w laughter. Sleep needed, stat.about 12 hours ago from web "

    I am so EXHAUSTED! I need SLEEP! Gosh I am so busy with my hectic and important life!

    I'm sick of this crap from her. She is not busy, nor important and has nothing to do but jiggle around the world on funtrips. She has no job and can sleep whenever the hell she wants for as long as she wants. This whole "I'm SO EXHAUSTED" bullshit is getting old, Julia.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Agreed, partypants. Julia Allison is "exhausted" from feeding her all night internet addiction and traveling to events where she is not invited, needed or wanted. Spare me. If these are the trying activities that exhaust her so, she's have an absolute breakdown if ever required to hold down the most basic of desk jobs. Basic skills like getting up early, sitting in one place for 8 hours and actually having to complete work ON DEADLINE are so far beyond her spoiled ass, it's not even funny. She is a coddled, lazy bitch no two ways about it.

    ReplyDelete
  36. new Baugher!

    http://baugher.tumblr.com/

    ReplyDelete
  37. Okay, I'm seeing a trend on this event poster:

    "Get Internet Famous! New Media Entrepreneur Julia Allison..."

    "WHO IS SHE: ...d) new media personality..."

    Who are they trying to kid with this "new" BS?? Let's face it, Julia Allison is OLD.

    ReplyDelete
  38. AND there's nothing "new" about being an internet personality.

    ReplyDelete
  39. lol. you people are idiots. "new media" is a concept.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Perez Hilton is an internet personality. Tilia Tequila is an internet personality. Heather Armstrong is an internet personality. Julia Allison is a nobody. Inflating your pitiful resume to get invites to speak at college clubs and obscure conferences is nothing to brag about, and the fact that she does brag about it just proves what a nobody she is.

    ReplyDelete
  41. It's hard to see how we are the idiots considering most of us will still have an income next year, and Princess Cupcakes Media will be busily botoxing in an attempt to ride out the last vestige of nanofame she had.

    The only way you can make a lasting career out of a concept is if your last name is Dali.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yeah, "new media" is a concept alright. One upon which Our Lady Julia Allison has but a tenuous, superficial grasp. As in: my Twitter favorites are my own, bunnies! And don't you dare comment. Toodles.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Iiiiiiiiiiinteresting.

    http://www.vimeo.com/1229618

    ReplyDelete
  44. God she's beyond attention whore. She can't even just stand there and let someone else talk. She has to make her stupid cakefaces, hand gestures, stupid asides. It's just lookatme lookatme lookatme.

    ReplyDelete
  45. That vimeo is oooold.

    ReplyDelete
  46. that wired cover makes her look like a cartoon character...it's so warped

    ReplyDelete
  47. New Baugher is hilarious and spot on!!

    ReplyDelete
  48. Julia's filthy tracksuitApril 22, 2009 at 11:28 AM

    Julia is about as "new media" as Cindy Adams. Her entire career has been in old media - TV appearances, print writing gigs, etc. Starting a vanity tumblr and glomming onto actual new media pioneers is not "new media" in any sense of the concept. WHY DOES NO ONE CALL HER OUT ON THIS????

    ReplyDelete
  49. if you love her so much why dont you go to her blog or email her asking her out. maybe she will write about your date

    ReplyDelete
  50. Julia Allison is most appropriate for Fox News which, I'd bet, would take her back for their 1am "talk" show. Fox News=Network in the business of lies. Julia Allison=non entity in the business of lies.

    ReplyDelete
  51. "Does anyone else have free, 24-7 snacks in their office? How do you handle it, if so?"

    ReplyDelete
  52. I wonder if the NonSociety.com Corporate World Headquarters will now stock 24/7 snacks????

    ReplyDelete
  53. Julia, I have 24-7 free snacks in my office and I handle it by chowing down on every corn dog, candy bar and organic microwave popcorn in sight. I then feel uber guilty about it and make late night videos of myself crying over it. It's very cathartic. Afterwards, I feel SO SO HAPPY. I juice cleanse for a day or two to make myself feel like I am doing something about it, until someone leave a box of cupcakes in the break room and then I eat one or two or five and the vicious cycle starts all over again. FYI - I weigh 178.

    ReplyDelete
  54. A delightfully unflattering picture of Julia Baugher at the oyster foo party. Nice chins.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/unclenate/3463616687/

    ReplyDelete
  55. Reality check, WIRED got it right the first time on their cover when they printed GET INTERNET FAMOUS!(Even if You're a Nobody). I am sure out of respect for her accomplished brother, his fellow MIT'ers decided to spin the cover in a more positive light.

    ReplyDelete
  56. JESUS 178?>??? what are you like the size of a church bus? You should probably just kill yourself if you're that fat, I would chug drano if I ever got over 150. 178. GAWD. Like I can't even believe a girls body can carry that much weight.

    ReplyDelete
  57. JACY ---> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE GIVE THIS JULIA ALLISON HOG ISLAND PHOTO IT'S OWN POST! SO DESERVING!

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/unclenate/3463616687/

    ReplyDelete
  58. omigod...does she have...MUTTONCHOPS? Are those sideburns????

    ReplyDelete
  59. that is one bitch of a picture. wrong angle, wrong side, wrong everything. i'm sure the only reason it's still up is that she didn't know it was out there in the first place until now.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Someone HAS to copy that horrid picture or screen cap it for posterity, in case it does get taken down. Too funny.

    ReplyDelete
  61. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3634/3463616687_1328bd0f08_b.jpg

    CAN'T UNSEE

    ReplyDelete
  62. love that the photographer captioned that heinous pic "feeding extravaganza." This picture is right up there with those "unapproved" birthday candids from San Fran.

    What's really funny is that 99% of people would not blink and eye or care at all if a picture like that was taken or posted. But Julia is such a contort-into-crazy-poses-only-photograph-one-side-of-my-face control freak that you know ugly ass pictures like that getting posted to a public flicker DRIVE HER MAD.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Wired apparently lost a ton of credibility and audience after putting Julia on the cover because the majority of its audience is tech industry and everybody knew she was a full out groupie nut job, plus it was widely known she worked the editor hard to get in.

    I think the cover very accurately shows Julia: Completely fake in every single way, down to the expensive shoes that aren't hers.

    ReplyDelete
  64. The photo has been removed!

    What did that take, less than a half hour?

    But she nnnnneeevvver reads this blog, nope.

    ReplyDelete
  65. If anyone has those photos, e-mail jacyandrussiangirl@gmail.com

    They were killed out almost as soon as they were mentioned here.

    ReplyDelete
  66. the link partypants sent still works albeit without the caption.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Anon: It tells me the photo is unavailable.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Jacy, that is too hilarious. This rapid fire photo deleting needs its own post, if only to prove that Julia Allison reads here and refreshes the page every three minutes. Linked at 12:04, gone less than 30 minutes later. Hysterical. Although kudos to her for being up before 1:00.

    HI JULIA!!! Even though that photo is gone, we all saw it and we all agree - unflattering to the extreme. Even more ugly that you asked the photographer to take it down. Ugly inside and out. At least you match.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Jacy - use this link -

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3634/3463616687_1328bd0f08_b.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  70. What I want to know is, how does the email exchange read when Julia finds these hideous photos of herself online and contacts the poster? What a whiny, petulant crazybitch she must sound like!

    Dear Wikipedia/unclenate/birthday photographer,

    Please delete this photo of me immediately. It is ugly. It is unapproved by me and you cannot use it. I say so.

    XOXO Julia

    ReplyDelete
  71. Thanks Anon, but I still get "photo unavailable." Maybe my IP address is blocked or something. Anyway, if someone's saved it, send it to us.

    ReplyDelete
  72. maybe she also threw in a cunt/dick/profanity of your choice

    ReplyDelete
  73. The thing that made me chortle about the Hog Island Oyster Foo expedition was knowing how horrified Our Lady Julia Allison must have been at the whole feast.

    "Eeeeew, squishy raw flesh of animal kingdom, will not put in the cupcake-and-juice vessel that is my purified body." While Meghanaise jumped in to shuck, oyster glove and all, I can only imagine Julia Allison smiling weakly, not wanting to look like a wuss in front of the oyster-scarfing guys.

    She was at one of the great meccas of American raw-oyster eating at Hog Island. Can't help but wonder if she managed to choke down an oyster. I'm betting she didn't. Such a sophisticate, that one.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Jacy -

    http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=28i4u41&s=5

    ReplyDelete
  75. Dys--Also, she apparently thinks it's called "Hog's Island." She is so dumb.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Akkkk!!! WORST ANGLE EVER for a photo...who took that? Had to have been a guy, because no girl wants to be photographed from that angle and most girls know that. Someone must've really have wanted to get on her bad side because they taught her truly worst side, from the puffy chin to the beefy arms.
    I can't even fathom why that photo was posted period, it's so awful!!!

    Julia's poofy arms strike again.

    ReplyDelete
  77. The same thing happened a week or two ago with a video that was linked here of Julia advertising some hair extension thing. Within probably 30-60 minutes it was made private. She might be keeping tabs on this site more than actual RBNS readers!

    ReplyDelete
  78. Mary spoke of someone named bob letting her know when there was something she 'should' read here, and it occured to me, they have an intern reading this, I am not saying that the three have not seen this with their own eyes, but I'm betting cupcakes that there is an intern who is assigned to keep tabs on this site,

    ReplyDelete
  79. OF COURSE she has publicity shots! don't we ALL know that she chose this because it IS the best photo of her... photo-shop of her, i mean. she uses NS and her 'speaking engagements' as a dating service. the whole point to JA's NS is 'i found a new way to date men by using the internet and having people believe i'm a 'professional' and not an online hooker' -- she's obvs trying to score an MIT boy. she completely, insanely, poofy-inflated and RELENTLESSLY desperate. those boys will be tres disappointed when they see HER NOW -- at LEAST 20 lbs heavier than that shot on the invite.

    ReplyDelete
  80. It's not even her weight or whatever! It's that she is basically a vagina with hair extensions. Once she is done talking about Julia Allison and name dropping, she has nothing left. She exhausts the topics she can sandbag people into thinking she is smart about, and after that any date she goes on with a smart guy quickly turns into a brick talking to a tree.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Julia Allison is most appropriate for Fox News which, I'd bet, would take her back for their 1am "talk" show. Fox News=Network in the business of lies. Julia Allison=non entity in the business of lies.Unlike MSNBC, Fox actually has some standards and hasn't had JABA on their shows in well more than a year.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Julia already burnt her bridge there.. through Greta, no less. lmao

    ReplyDelete