Monday, May 11, 2009

Nom. Nom. One. Bite. Yeah. Right.

There is a tingling in my pants, but its allegiances are shifting. Randi is officially the hot one now. Julia is much closer to this than she thinks. In the face, at least. The paunch wants what the paunch wants (Here I speak of my own paunch, not Julia's. NOMNOMNOMNOM).  

176 comments:

  1. I ONLY ATE ONE BITE!!! I DO NOT HAS EATING DISORDER!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's that creepy twin thing again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In Julia Allison land, if you view the camera as being a father-substitute then everything makes so much more sense.
    "Dadddyyy! Look at meeeee!"

    Compare to Randi who looks at the camera sanely.

    Julia is really hung up on food. Christ, who cares how many bites of dessert you had.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Randicakes is gorge.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Straws are good in Julia Allison world these days, cuz they let you suck in your poufy cheeks and de-emphasize the growing double chin. Look for straw-sipping to follow kiss-blowing, kissy face and hiding behind fellow photo subjects as a new JA go-to pose.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In one go counts as one bite, doesn't it?
    I didn't know I was still sick of sweets-cunnilingus since the birthday bash, but turns out I am.
    Also, from this angle it looks like her left eye magically shrunk to half the size of the right one. Creepy twins, these two.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The difference between Julia Allison's left and right eye is really striking in that photo. Oh, Dr. Bobby, what hath thou wrought?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, Dyspeptic, only saw we had the same thought. Want half a mentos to commemorate that?

    ReplyDelete
  9. You gotta hand it to Randi Zzzzzzz, at least her eyes are roughly the same size.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Super Size Me JowlsMay 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM

    BluePrint Cleanse juice comes in chocolate milkshake flavor??? Thanks for the recommendation, Miss Piggy! I will head down to my local McDonald's right now to pick one up!

    ps- you can get a medium chocolate flavored cleanse juice for only $1.19 at Mickey Dees - personally, I think you're paying too much at $85 a day!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Does Randi's hubby like being relegated to the 3rd wheel in this relationship?

    ReplyDelete
  12. ironic slanket: I love you and I accept your offer of half a mento. With pleasure.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Her entire face looks awful in that photo. Very waxy, too many injectibles, too much plastic surgery. It's a look I see a lot visiting my parents in Boca, but never really before on someone under 50. Uglyface.com!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wow. You can really tell Randi got her hair and makeup done professionally. She actually doesn't look like the president of the Leprechaun High School Debate Team for once. Julia's hair and makeup looks like she did it on the cab ride to the dinner.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Evil wonk eye look like it sending scary curse to anyone who criticize poofy sucking chocolate cock substitute from Randi Zuckercrazy's hand! Someone hold me.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Is it wishful thinking, or does Randi look over all this stupid posing shit? Probs just wishful thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Here is what Julia's face looked like that same night - without all of the waxy photoshopping and extreme cheek suckinginnage:

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=36642828&op=1&view=user&subj=4617&id=4617

    She is in the background on the left.

    ReplyDelete
  18. SomeProblems, alas, wishful. Check out that left arm on Randi Z: cocked and placed on hip, just like Julia Allison showed her.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wait... you mean this isn't a photo from the future of their wedding, where they come out as secret lesbian lovers, wear coordinating navy blue wedding dresses and serve each other chocolate pudding instead of wedding cake?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Dumb question - people actually Photoshop their own party snaps?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Well, Dyspeptic, I would have preferred the top of the Empire State building, but the top post on RBNS will do :)

    ReplyDelete
  22. BunnyBingo, "people" no, "Julia Allison" yes. She actually photoshops the hell out of her candids and party pictures. Notice how she NEVER posts iPhone photos or candids from events as they are happening... always a day or so later. She is a total control freak. People have also pointed out really obvious blurs and lines in the photos that give them away as being photoshopped. Once, she even "mirrored" her own eye to hide the wonk! Truly pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Oh Julia Allison Baugher, you are so adorbs!
    "I'm very proud to say I ate just one bite."
    Tee hee.
    That's so cute, right? Because it shows that even though you love chocolate like every little girl, you are denying yourself to keep your womanly figure trim and slim for your future husband! Wow! Now there's a little lady the women of America would do well to emulate! Am I right?
    I hope one of your thousands of diehard Facebook fans has already made arrangements to nominate you for whatever Outstanding US Citizen of the Year Award you surely must qualify for. Bravo! (Oops ... sorry. Didn't mean to bring up any unpleasantness).

    ReplyDelete
  24. At least Randi isn't baring her fangs in this shot.

    ReplyDelete
  25. They look like entwined gargoyles.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Oh, Julia, you and your lawyerspeak again! Yeah... you only "ate" one bite, but you didn't mention that you "drank" about a dozen of those mini milkshakes. Whoopsie! Time for a juice cleanse again!

    ReplyDelete
  27. So, how bad is it for "normal" people (i.e., not in the public eye) to have non-whitened teeth? Y'all have made me all self-conscious about my teeth, which are only slightly whiter than Randi's.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Julia's Old FaceMay 11, 2009 at 5:11 PM

    Don't you miss me?
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianvan/132002288/

    ReplyDelete
  29. Randi's yellow chompersMay 11, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    I dunno, anon. Hers look really jaundiced to me. I'm a coffee/tea drinker and I don't use any special toothpaste or anything, so mine aren't exactly glowing in the dark, either. But, yeesh. Hers are really yellow! And she's always grinning ear to ear. Don't you think one would notice, hey my teeth look pretty nast, I should buy some Rembrandt?

    "only slightly whiter than Randi's." You're saying a lot there. If they aren't solid yellow, you're fine.

    ReplyDelete
  30. anon 508, it's not bad for people - in the public eye or not - to have yellow teeth. It's just more various scorn deservedly heaped on Randi Zuckerberg for being dumb enough to be besties with Julia Allison. Just like how Julia is not fat, but people say she is anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Did you guys see what one commenter said who actually went to the VF after-party? Bottom of this thread: http://rebloggingnonsociety.blogspot.com/2009/05/julia-dear-god-not-kissy-face.html#comments

    ReplyDelete
  32. To the Anon asking about teeth color: It's really easy to whiten teeth these days. I swear by Crest Whitestrips and my electronic toothbrush. :)

    ReplyDelete
  33. Julia's DelusionsMay 11, 2009 at 5:19 PM

    SS - that is hilarious about the after party! Spies are everywhere, Julia Allison! So... she basically stood in front of the backdrop and red carpet, posed for a photoshoot for her own camera and lied and said it was the afterparty? SOOOOO pathetic and delusional. This is right up there with her standing at the podium at MIT and pretending to address her audience. What a whack job. I keep waiting for "Julia Allison" to be some kind of giant prank... A person like this cannot really exist RIGHT?????

    ReplyDelete
  34. Jacy this photo is driving Foolia bonkers at the moment, please screen grab and consider using it for it's own post.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Julia Allison should be X-rated material for young women, especially those tweens who might come across her blog. To proudly discuss turning down food (when you're not on a healthy diet and merely cheering yourself along), write a long post about your eating disorder in which you declare yourself cured (if she truly received treatment, she'd know it's a life long struggle), receive plastic surgeries and facial "pumping" prior to the age of 25, proclaim that there are NO WOMEN IN BUSINESS, and finally that women have an expiration date----

    Oh, it makes my blood boil!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Records CustodianMay 11, 2009 at 5:27 PM

    Not sure if that story about the after party is true:

    http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/

    ReplyDelete
  37. Julia Allison's photo of her at the Bloomberg "after party" is clearly at the pre party. You can tell from the patterned hotel carpet. NOT the after party.

    Here is the comment from the spy, in case you don't want to click to an old thread - BUSTED Julia!
    ---------------
    I went to the WHCD... it was a total zoo... people can practically walk off the street and go to the pre-dinner cocktail parties (sponsored by Newsweek, Bloomberg, etc, various media groups). Held in the basement of the Hilton -- very claustrophobic.

    Went to the VF party that started at 11:00pm at the (sigh) French Ambassador's residence, which is basically, a chateau on five acres in the middle of DC. It was such a great party, absolutely beautiful setting, women were all gorgeously dressed, great food, tons of champagne, wine, etc. Only about 300 people were there. I felt as if I was in the middle of a Chanel ad. Everyone was just happy and having great conversations with one another.

    I did see JA in the scrum of the hallway at the Hilton. Her dress seemed nice enough, in a midwest sort of way, but BOY, does she wear a lot of makeup in public. It ages her. Very 1950, retro vibe.

    Fortunately, she was nowhere to be seen at the VF party. They were pretty strict at the door, I'm sorry -- the entrance at the black, cast iron gates at the end of the drive...

    One of the best parties I have every gone too.

    Hi -- someone posted earlier about JA at the Bloomberg party -- she was at the pre-dinner cocktail part of the evening (that, as I said, anyone could walk into). They are basically large impersonal rooms off the hallway -- go DC party planners!

    The VF/Bloomberg afterparty started at 11:00pm and had a very serious door policy.

    Having said that -- I met Capt Sully! There are pictures of it in Washington Post... unbelievably chic and romantic. Well, it IS the French Ambassador's residence, I suppose.

    Okay, not to belabor the point (but what the heck), just checked out JA blog. She has a pic of her in front of a yellow backdrop with "Bloomberg" written all over it. The cap says something like: "Bloomberg after party..."

    What a complete nut/liar.

    That (as I mentioned earlier) was the Bloomberg pre-dinner cocktail party... that any of you could have walked into, and not even have been dressed. It was basically a room with a bar at the end.

    There was so rope, no red carpet, etc at the VF/Bloomberg after party... basically walk up a long candle lit drive, surrounded by these amazing trees and park, walk up the front steps to a French chateau and grab a glass of champagne. It really was a late night, romantic, happy party.

    And the most beautiful rooms... full of French Impressionist paintings. Valerie Jarrett also had a beautiful pink gown on... there is a great photo of she and three other women sitting on a couch in their ballgowns laughing.

    As I said, very chic.

    No JA.

    I (sort of) can't believe she posted that dopey picture... didn't she think that any of US would be at the REAL PARTY? :)

    ReplyDelete
  38. BTW, Randi zzzzzzzzzzucker obviously had her makeup professionally done and I think it looks outstanding. Also, her dress was young and modern.

    Can't say the same about ol' jules.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Which story? JA's or the commenter? Because... http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/zzAtmosphere_050909_530.html

    ReplyDelete
  40. Yeah, Bloomberg and VF did host the afterparty at the French Ambassador's house. There was a red carpet.

    And the "walk and step" is the same at both events. I think that commenter was wrong or making up a tip.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Records CustodianMay 11, 2009 at 5:33 PM

    Sausage, I saw a few pics with the yellow Bloomberg background.

    ReplyDelete
  42. So wait, we like randi now?

    5:28--but what was the difference between the two parties?

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Anon 5:28PM - GOD she is SUCH a fucking liar.

    Jacy, PLEASE create a new post for this: Jackles caught lying about attending Bloomberg/VF AFTER party! Pretty Please!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Julia Allison's story about going to the afterparty is a lie. The backdrop/photo line was on purple carpet at the after party - not the hotel patterned carpet - that was the pre party, which anyone could get into.
    http://tinypic.com/r/szvpfs/5

    Plus, here is a story about it being really exclusive:
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2009/05/_how_do_you_throw.html

    ReplyDelete
  45. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  46. If you look at the captions, every photo with the bloomberg backdrop says pre-cocktail party...or whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Gary Klein D.D.S.May 11, 2009 at 5:41 PM

    Total Jing...hey baby!

    You think about me today? My Jules is still out of town. Whadda ya say you, me and Partypants head over to PP's place later tonight for a little bit of cold Franzia and a whole lotta 'Gary After Dark'?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Sorry, TJ, but the carpet does not lie. The Boomberg party pic page

    http://bloomberg.com/afterparty

    has photos of both the pre party and the after party mixed together. You can tell because some of the photos are clearly in a hotel ballroom, not the French estate. The backdrop is the same, but they are in different locations. Julia was very obviously on the red carpet at the cocktail reception, NOT the after party. The carpet for the after party was purple.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Only if we can pose on that red carpet you set up in hallway to make Julia feel "special." I know you usually put plastic over it when Julia is not around; you need to protect her sacred carpet. I totally understand. But, just this once, could PP and I pose on the carpet for you?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Wow. I never noticed the Wonk Eye until I came upon this site. Now, there it is, in every photo -- actually, which one is considered the "wonk" eye -- the little one or the big one?

    ReplyDelete
  51. I would pay $120 to see Randi and Julia doing each other.

    ReplyDelete
  52. These shots are labelled pre-dinner cocktails, has the same carpet as Julias photot and is obviously in a hotel:
    http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/_BIL9701.html
    and
    http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/_BIL9692.html

    Julia:
    http://julia.nonsociety.com/post/106015389-0-0

    ReplyDelete
  53. While people debate carpet color....there is a sure way to know she was not at the afterparty:

    No picture w/eva

    No picture w/chuckbass

    could keep going but the list is really long.

    ReplyDelete
  54. 5:42

    You are correct! http://www.bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/_BIL9831.html

    That Sherri Shepard Photo (who the gals have pics with) proves it. It's marked PRE party.

    ReplyDelete
  55. 5:46

    That and a standing offer from a gawker commenter to see her boobs for $125.00 [I think that's the rate] would mean she could afford one of mary's trainers and get summer ready!

    ReplyDelete
  56. http://www.bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/_BIL9794.html

    The Washington Hilton

    Same carpet as in Jules' picture. PRE PARTY.

    LIAR

    ReplyDelete
  57. Marjorie "Ma Kettle" MainMay 11, 2009 at 5:52 PM

    Good Christ, that Zuckerburg woman is ugly! No amount of peridontal work, Botox, or Julia Allison aped poses are helping here.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Um, did any of you read the caption?

    "Liya Kebede arrives for the after party hosted by Bloomberg following the White House Correspondents' Associatin Dinner on April 26, 2008 in Washington, D.C."

    We need a 2009 purple carpet picture. I'm not saying I don't believe she is capable of lying about this, but this is not sufficient proof.

    ReplyDelete
  59. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Randi is the hot one now. And if she got her teeth bleached, it really wouldn't even be a close call.

    ReplyDelete
  61. http://www.bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/_BIL9794.html

    This photo clearly has the same carpet, same back drop, as Julia photo, IRonic. It is marked 2009. It is marked PRE party.

    ReplyDelete
  62. == BLOOMBERG White House Correspondents Pre-Dinner Cocktails== The Washington Hilton, Washington DC== May 9, 2009== � Patrick McMullan== Photo - BILLY FARRELL/PatrickMcMullan.com== ==

    http://www.bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/_BIL9794.html

    Proof Julia was NOT at the afterparty but the PRE party. Cocktails like the anonymous commenter left. Not the afterparty at the french ambassador's mansion.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Records CustodianMay 11, 2009 at 6:05 PM

    I stand corrected. All of the yellow Bloomberg logo shots are at the pre-dinner cocktail party, at least as they are labeled on the official link.

    http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/index2.html

    I think our commenter spoke the truth and there was no logo photo opp at the after party. Which, of course, means Julia was lying. Sorry to have doubted you, commenter. It is always safer to bet that Julia is lying.

    s

    ReplyDelete
  64. I'm just saying nobody should base this on the link to the purple carpet pic as it is from last year.

    This way her bloomberg picture actually fits the timeline on her "blog". So she just posts stuff in the order she finds it on her memory card? Also, I would have been very surprised if she had not photographed the glamorous location at all.

    ReplyDelete
  65. re teeth: has anyone met randi IRL? cuz i am wondering if her teeth are extra yellow, or just what everyone else's look like that aren't done done done, you know?

    ReplyDelete
  66. Are you bunnies trying to tell me Jules is not being transparent on her liecast? I am getting my feathers ruffled over here.
    ugh.blergh.WTF!

    ReplyDelete
  67. Bitch, please. We would have had 18 photos of her ruining that outrageous view of the yard had she been at the afterparty.

    ReplyDelete
  68. well at least nobody's e-mailing her about bloomberg-gate!

    ReplyDelete
  69. I already have, 6:14!!!!!!! We love emailing her here. Go away if you aren't into it.

    ReplyDelete
  70. No need to email! Julia read here. Just like with Lunch.com; I'm sure the photo caption will be "corrected" any minute now!

    ReplyDelete
  71. Don't speak for meMay 11, 2009 at 6:18 PM

    We = the anons?

    ReplyDelete
  72. http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/EWestwick_050909_560.html

    Someone needs to photoshop Dr. Gary's wife into this picture so we can have definitive proof she was at the afterparty.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Jackle's Wonky EyeMay 11, 2009 at 6:24 PM

    @Anon 6:12PM - you are totally right! She would have posted photos of herself in every goddamned room of that place, with captions like: 'OMGZ!!11 You Guys!!! I am at the FRENCH AMBASSADOR'S RESIDENCE!! I feel like a PRINCESS!!'

    And you just KNOW she would have convinced OMG RANDI!! to video her doing a lip dub of Maurice Chevalier's 'Thank Heaven for Little Girls' whilst wandering the gardens.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Haha just checked, and both photos still say "after party".

    T-minus 30 seconds until they're changed...

    ReplyDelete
  75. Listen Jankles, you are slipping into expiration territory. Six months ago you would not have made this gaffe. The picture alone is enough, you should not have added the caption about the afterparty. You are losing your finesse with baiting and building suspense. Impressario extraordinaire indeed.
    Have a great day! XO

    ReplyDelete
  76. Why the fuck do you people email her? God, that is so fucking weird.

    ReplyDelete
  77. True, although "Je ne regrette rien" would have been another fantastic lip dub option - allows for GRAND gestures.
    I guess I was just concerned that someone might try to set this lovely bunch up by using the old pic as bait.
    All other clues, especially not a single picture in the gorgeous interior point indeed at yet another poorly executed sham. How does this person live with herself?

    ReplyDelete
  78. I don't email her and never will, thanks for pigeon holing everyone here, 6:27:

    ReplyDelete
  79. There was no carpet and backdrop walk at the after party - FAIL Julia Allison!!

    ReplyDelete
  80. No way in hell Jackles was at that after party. That party was top drawer only (the gossip girl boys are top drawer looks only -- imo) and Randi Facebook Zuckerberg doesn't quite make that cut and she was providing coattail service that night.

    The evidence speaks for itself.

    1. The tacky poster, and carpet;

    2. That setting and party design was gorgeous. Jackles would have been furiously documenting up a storm. (Also why she'd never be admitted to such a party).

    3. She already fessed up to not meeting Chuck Bass -- and she would have had pretty me open access to him at that party and would have been able to stalk him no probs (Ha. Another reason she'd never have gained admittance).

    In short, she is a stupid bitch who is so desperate at this point that she will stop at nothing to Keep Up Appearances (a hilarious British sit-com -- too bad Jackles is not so funny). She is a desperate, lying little fatty. HA!

    ReplyDelete
  81. The only person I would email would be that Lila woman that wanted Mark Z. as her guest and ended up with big sister and her pitiful +1.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Question: then where was she in the photos with Randi sitting on those marble (or whatever) steps? That's a mansion, no?

    ReplyDelete
  83. Those marble steps were outside the Capitol File afterparty venue.

    ReplyDelete
  84. OK. Thanks, you Phd-ers!!

    ReplyDelete
  85. Uh, that looks to be the Hilton. Check the earlier photos with the Ineffable Alexander Marquardt -- there are the very same steps!

    Julia is a lying little pig. End of story.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Somebody has more specific deets. End result: Julia is STILL a lying little pig.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Oh, how it must have killed Julia Allison to know she could not get into that VF/Bloomberg afterparty with Graydon Carter, @aplusk and @mrskutcher, and the gang from Gossip Girl. That must have been why her night was so very epic, and why she was so, so happy afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Hmmm..looked on the Hilton website cuz im crazy...no steps. whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  89. http://z.about.com/d/dc/1/0/a/I/corcoranchristmas2.jpg

    Corcoran Gallery. Inside. Capitol File party. Same steps.

    http://julia.nonsociety.com/lifecast/105996377-0-24

    ReplyDelete
  90. there is no way she went to the VF party. We'd STILL be hearing about it. Did not happen.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Oh Dr. Gary, why don't you dump that pathetic lying Spackleface and come over and drink with a REAL woman. BBWs know how to love. And I have great teeth that aren't veneers.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Have you people seen this bullshit: http://geekadvancement.com/contrib

    ReplyDelete
  93. why the haterade on dr. gary? i dated him in college and even tho his weenie is teenie he is very kind and gentle

    ReplyDelete
  94. Edith Piaf's Spinning CorpseMay 11, 2009 at 7:04 PM

    @ironic slanket - Good call on the song choice! Didn't even think of that one.

    I just went straight for the Chevalier because of daddy issues, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Gary Klein D.D.S.May 11, 2009 at 7:11 PM

    Girls, girls, girls! No fighting over the Gar-ster. There is plenty of me to go around.
    And you KNOW how fond I am of the BBWs. Just more of you to love!

    @Anon 7:00PM - Not sure who you are, but it's not nice to spread lies like that about Dr. Gary. Ask around, you'll see. Let's just say Dr. Gary has A LOT of satisfied customers.

    ReplyDelete
  96. How pathetic will it be if Gawker picks up the Bloomberg-after-party-gate story? RZ you better rethink the value of your faux friendship with this horrid imbecile.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Gary I put a pic up for you...and thanks to tmi weekly I can say I LOVE YOU GARY!

    PS please fix randi's ratteef. :*

    ReplyDelete
  98. Maybe Randi hangs out with Julia because Julia makes her look good.

    ReplyDelete
  99. narcissist headbandMay 11, 2009 at 7:21 PM

    Randi looks good in these shots, because she clearly had her hair and make-up professionally done. These professionals know that hair should be worn up at these types of events. Miss Julia should have done the same. Her ridiculous gone with the wind hairdo is just so tired, and it did nothing for her, especially paired with that dress.
    I don't get the following:
    1. Why doesn't Jackles just lose the weight already? It's only like 10-15 lb. She is single and childless, without a 9-5 job. She has nothing but time to go to the gym (isn't there one in her building?). She could even go to Weight Watchers---she'd drop those extra lb in a few weeks. When I was her age and without kids, I had no problem losing weight. now as I sit here with a career and three kids, I find the weight hard to lose, because there is NO TIME.
    2.Why the tired, tired, hair? Why doesn't she EVER wear her hair up? Even up in a clip or in a frigging ponytail, it would look nice. The bobby pins and sausage curls are beginning to freak me right out. Too doll-like.
    Ok, I guess it was just those two things. But those two things are bugging me.

    ReplyDelete
  100. oh my god, her latest post. The contents of her shopping basket. Why does she do that? I recall a photo of wrapped fish from another recent shopping trip?

    ReplyDelete
  101. If she put her hair up they'd be able to count her chins from space.

    ReplyDelete
  102. Gary Klein D.D.S.May 11, 2009 at 7:26 PM

    @Partypants - Yeah, baby! You are one foxy lady. But I have to say, am a bit disappointed that you're so skinny. You know I like a little meat on my girl's bones. Just take a look at my Julia these days. She has been looking GOOD.

    And don't worry, the offer is out to Randi. Hopefully, I'll get my hands on her soon.

    Leave a key under the mat tonight ;)

    ReplyDelete
  103. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  104. but why does it say at the top of the screen to credit the vanity fair AFTER party when using the photo. so maye she wasn't lying, she used the term they said to use? I have no idea i'm basing this on just one picture somebody linked here
    http://www.bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/_BIL9794.html

    ReplyDelete
  105. 7:29

    Julia knew where she was. She knew it was BEFORE dinner. She wasn't in a time warp.

    Bloomberg hosted a PRE reception, where the photos are credited from and a POST party.

    ReplyDelete
  106. Julia's Shopping BasketMay 11, 2009 at 7:32 PM

    oh hai guys! look what's in me! all veggies, only healthy stuff allowed. julia luuuurves salads, and hatez cupcakes. no cupcakes here! no way julia has a fat! LIU peepz, shopping basket out!

    ReplyDelete
  107. Look at the caption of that photo, Anon @7.29.
    There it says == BLOOMBERG White House Correspondents Pre-Dinner Cocktails== The Washington Hilton, Washington DC== May 9, 2009== � Patrick McMullan== Photo - BILLY FARRELL/PatrickMcMullan.com== ==

    ReplyDelete
  108. Julia was at the pre party because the wall paper and carpet at the Hilton is identical.

    The French Ambassador's Residence does not have the same wallpaper and carpet as the Washington Hilton!

    ReplyDelete
  109. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  110. @Anon 7:29PM - but look at what it says under the photo

    "BLOOMBERG White House Correspondents Pre-Dinner Cocktails"

    I am guessing that all of the before and after photos were posted together on:

    http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/

    and the instructions at the top re: photo credit are just an error.

    Also, this is what the arrival for the after party looked like:

    http://bloomberg.com/afterparty/slides/HDancyCDanes_050909.html

    No banner, no red carpet or yellow signage. And under the photo it says:

    "BLOOMBERG & VANITY FAIR Cocktail Reception After the White House Correspondents Association Dinner== The Residence of the French Ambassador, Washington DC"

    ReplyDelete
  111. Jules, I am contacting Lila to clarify the after-party itinerary. Do you think she will cover for you? I don't.

    ReplyDelete
  112. PARTYGATE '09 at least will erase Chingate.

    ReplyDelete
  113. TJ

    Yes i understand that and agree with you that she would know if she was at a preparty or afterparty. however it does specifically say on that link to credit pics with the term "afterparty", even on the preparty photos. that is all i was pointing out.

    i understand her provlivity toward suggesting things that aren't actually what really happened. in this case though the wording on that web page gives a bit of an excuse for her to label her photos that way, that's all I was saying.

    I haven't seen her photos or captions or anything else so I don't know how extensive her suggestions were, whether it was just a photo credit or she went out of her way to state that she was at the afterparty. obviously the latter is much more egregious, assuming that she really was not at the afterparty

    ReplyDelete
  114. Wow. You're highly invested.

    ReplyDelete
  115. 7:40

    I know! that was my point. the pic is of the preparty but on top it says to credit it "afterparty." even the web page address is labeled after party. so i was pointing out in this case she has an "official" excuse to point to to justify her labelling of the photos.

    it probably is an error but that web page is confusing. to someone who was there of course, like julia, it should be clear which event/s they were at and what they were called

    ReplyDelete
  116. except she didn't get her picture from that website

    ReplyDelete
  117. Hey Jules, what is lawyer speak for FRAUD?

    ReplyDelete
  118. Randi's yeller chompersMay 11, 2009 at 8:23 PM

    Wouldn't you think Old Yeller would take her husband to the WHCD instead of her stalky girlfriend? Unless her husband has an aversion to freakshows.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Records CustodianMay 11, 2009 at 8:33 PM

    Uh, sweet thing 7:54, 8:09?

    That is an instruction for people using the photographs on that site. Not for posting your own damn pictures.

    That is a really weird defense, not unlike claiming that "a woman has an expiration date" had some relevance to childbearing years.

    ReplyDelete
  120. @Randi's yeller chompers 8:23PM - 'Old Yeller'??? You are KILLING me!!

    And you make a good point: why in the hell ISN'T Old Yeller taking her husband to these events? They've only been married for about a year. Wouldn't you take your new-ish spouse to such a high-profile event?

    Unless Jankles is being the Super Annoying Needy Friend, who stalker calls and demands attention 24/7. The husband is probably tolerating it, for now. But at some point, he'll tire of Jankle's shenanigans and force Old Yeller to freeze her out.

    ReplyDelete
  121. But peoples, Princess of Phony needs an out, an excuse for the blatant lie. Why can't you just play along?

    ReplyDelete
  122. Strange that Randi Zzzzz is borrowing Hoolia's famewhore poses and mannerisms a year after getting married. Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  123. Randi's yellow chompersMay 11, 2009 at 8:57 PM

    8:38 - Yeah, I don't get it. Maybe Julia was the "sideshow" guest. Like how invited guests ask people like Sanjaya & Ozzy Osbourne to be their +1.

    Regardless, it's weird. Why do I imagine that she's married to a really sweet guy whose balls are kept in a vise grip?

    ReplyDelete
  124. If she slipped on one pic and said "afterparty", meh, its a Julia sized lie but only once could be a slip.

    On two different (or rather, identical, just twice posted) pics? Yeah, intentional. And huge. I hope Gawker calls her out for being the poser she is. Or perhaps her beloved Page Six. Any tipsters?

    ReplyDelete
  125. Oh dear God! when I googled "Randi Zuckerberg's yellow teeth" this is the image result!

    http://hawtaction.com/2008/07/28/cat-brushing-teeth.jpg

    bwahahahaahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  126. Yes i understand that those photos are not where Julia got her pics from. wow, how did what was to be a quick innocuous comment turn into this? this is absurd.

    my point was (repeated for like the 3rd or 4th time now) that the orgaizers (if that's who that page actually belongs to, looks to be since it says bloomberg.com ) appear to be insturcting people to label preparty photos as afterparty, that's ALL.

    If you don't understand how that could possibly explain someone labelling their photos according to the same convention, Records Custodian, then nothing I add at this point will change that. It doesn't even seem like you read my comments/clarification. But whatever, if you feel better viewing an undisputable observation as a "really weird defense", it makes no sense to me but that's your prerogative.

    ReplyDelete
  127. Wow. Old Yeller is not looking so hot here. Jankles has raised the bar in the looks dept.

    http://www.heebmagazine.com/100/new_media/randi_zuckerberg

    ReplyDelete
  128. Records CustodianMay 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM

    So you are saying that a reasonable person could think that Bloomberg was telling everyone across the world that any pictures whatsoever from the pre-party should be labeled as after party photos?

    Fascinating. Truly.

    ReplyDelete
  129. Enough Randi bashing already. I'm beginning to think maybe she's keeping an eye on her to keep her away from Mark?

    ReplyDelete
  130. Oh my Lord, how could I not have noticed Julia's wonky eye before!? It doesn't seem to be there in her earlier pictures. Is this Dr. Bobby's fault? That man should be taken out back and smothered with his own dopey aging hipster sweater.

    Julia, for the love of Christ, leave your face alone. Maybe go a week without makeup. No more injections. Let everything slowly morph back to its natural state so that you can, hopefully, stop looking like a molten s'more.

    If I ever considered getting surgery, this just put an end to that.

    ReplyDelete
  131. It's obvs an innocent mistake for Hoolia to claim she attended the most exclusive afterparty when she didn't. How rude of VF/Bloomberg to overlook inviting a 28 year old tween loon. Her afterparty consisted in standing at the bow of a boat pretending to be Kate Winslet--her self-described "Titanic pose" is more comically apt than she realizes.

    ReplyDelete
  132. @Anon 9:06PM - I actually feel bad saying this, but poor Old Yeller has got to be one of the most unattractive girls I've ever seen.

    Someone earlier made a comment about RZ being the Drama Geek to Jackle's Head Cheerleader. It's a mutually beneficial relationship. Old Yeller gets a bit of Jankle's 'pretty-ness' (although that's fading very fast!) to rub off on her, and Jankles gets invited to high-profile events and access to Old Yeller's inner circle.

    ReplyDelete
  133. @Anon 9:17

    Yeah Randi must have quite the social life to spend so much time with Hoolia. She seems about as well-adjusted as her genious brother, who runs a business selling dollar bills for 75 cents.

    ReplyDelete
  134. Randi's Yellow ChompersMay 11, 2009 at 9:22 PM

    By Jove, I think you've cracked the code 9:06. Old Yeller is def. sucking out some of the pretty.

    It must kill Julia that Old Yeller
    a) went to Harvard
    b) has a great job, w/fat paycheck
    c) has a husband
    d) and YELLOW TEETH! It's.Not.FAIR!!! .com!!!

    ReplyDelete
  135. randi is beginning to make me wonder whether being julia allison is like being the dread pirate roberts.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Anon 9:10: If she had too much Botox injected in one side of her forehead, it could definitely have caused the Wonk eye.

    Dr. Freebie should have been a little less happy go lucky with the needle. Didn't he have to take some sort of "First, do no Wonk" oath?

    ReplyDelete
  137. great point, randi's yellow chompers!

    it must drive LIU Jill nuts that she is a legit harvard grad with a very high-profile job. think about it, almost EVERY SINGLE THING LIU Jill has done recently has been thanks to OMG Randi!!!!!! Must drive her nuts. If Randi told her to take a hike, that would essentially be the end of Julia Allison (I mean, really, what else would she post about if she wasn't able to ride Randi's coattails to important events)...

    ReplyDelete
  138. New convo with Dan designed to position Julia in a sympathetic light has been posted.
    Julia weighs 139 pounds. Is that a lot, not sure what her height is.

    http://julia.nonsociety.com/post/106520729-0-0

    ReplyDelete
  139. also, i do agree that the most absurd thing julia has done recently is her whole b-school show: i-am-going-to-harvard-business-school!!!!!! not to be too snarky, but the best undergrad into which she was able to gain admission was indiana university -- and that was after going to a fancy private school and being closely watched by her parents. honestly, i have to assume that the vast majority of graduating seniors from whatever prep school she attended end up in the ivy league or similar schools.

    does she honestly expect us to believe that AFTER a very mediocre (or below) performance at georgetown, plus ZERO legitimate business experience, she would be able to get into HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL??? i'm no expert, but that is one of the hardest schools to get into in the country (they have a less than 10% admittance rate and over 92% of the people accepted choose to attend, which makes it the single most selective program in the country). so, yeah, she def could get in if she wanted to. either that, or she should become obama's head speechwriter. it's up to her...

    ReplyDelete
  140. boo hoo dan, i gained a few pounds. i know you're dying of cancer, but my weight has priority. aw, but you thought i was skinny before, thx. btw, i like your new skinny look too. sucks about the cancer though. kissyface!

    ReplyDelete
  141. Randi's yellow chompersMay 11, 2009 at 10:00 PM

    139 = not smokin'. It's normal, which means she has double chins & flabby arms on camera (which adds another 10 lbs.)

    This conversation w/Dan proves what I've said before: She isn't stressed, she isn't falling apart. She should be, if she had even the slightest modicum of dignity and self respect. But she's not. Lipdubs and headbands and slankets, oh my.

    ReplyDelete
  142. She is not 139 lbs., unless she's 4'7" tall. She lies about so many things, so I don't understand why so many people here are so eager to believe her when she talks about something so personal and so integral to her personal identity.

    I'm about the same height that she claims to be (I don't trust a single thing that psycho says), and at 139, I wouldn't have the multiple chins and bingo arms that she does. That loon has more chins than the Chinatown phonebook.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Based on the recent photos of Jaba, I'd peg her in the 150-151 range.

    In the beginning, the poundage went to her lower half, which was easy to hide under the A-line costume skirts. Her pear shape kept expanding, but when the upper half and her face started showing signs of growth, she was packing on even more and it was harder to hide.

    ReplyDelete
  144. Yeah, I love that someone just believes her when she says she's fine, she's not breaking down, she's not stressed. I don't even think *she* knows what a mess she is (hint: sleeping alternately 14 hours a night and not at all in no way equals fine), and if she did, she wouldn't admit it on her blog.

    ReplyDelete
  145. Randi's yellow chompersMay 11, 2009 at 10:11 PM

    oh, you assholes are killing me tonight!!! More chins than the Chinatown phonebook. Dayum.

    She's 5'7" ? 5'6"? 139 would be beefy for 5'6". She looked great about a year ago. Not too thin, but not packin' any extra cottage cheese, either.

    None of us would honestly give a shit if she had any kind of personality. It's just that, for so long, all she's had to "offer" was cheesecake. And now the cheesecake is topped with hot fudge, gravy, bacon crumbles, shredded pot roast, and chocolate chips.

    ReplyDelete
  146. i've met her in person several times; no way she's taller than 5'5"

    ReplyDelete
  147. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  148. "the cheesecake is topped with hot fudge, gravy, bacon crumbles, shredded pot roast, and chocolate chips."

    sounds like momsers' 7 layer dip!

    ReplyDelete
  149. Merp, "First, do no Wonk" is an RBNS classic one-liner. Honor is due to Anon 9:38.

    Anonny 9:38, why no take that as your handle so your greatness can follow wherever you comment?

    ReplyDelete
  150. Randi's Yellow Chompers, great line about the rococo cheesecake toppings, too, but I get all disoriented because deep inside I know you're...
    sad :(

    ReplyDelete
  151. I have met the fraud in person also and she is about 5'4" at the most. And 9:51, JA did not attend a prep school, she attended New Trier High School in Winnetka, IL. She frequently references her fellow Trevian alum's.

    ReplyDelete
  152. O Jay-sus check out the ugly step sisters shoes she put on her blog with "best shoes" caption.

    http://julia.nonsociety.com/lifecast/106009707-0-23

    ReplyDelete
  153. That convo with Dan is fake. Giveaway? Dan: "Everyone keeps asking me what's wrong with you."

    Um, NO. In his state, "everyone" is not asking him about Julia or concerned with her fragile state - like "everyone" follows Julia and her blog religiously. Not happening. LIES.

    ReplyDelete
  154. Yeah, pretty sure if she actually went to the Bloomie afterparty she would have seen some real exotic shoes.

    ReplyDelete
  155. oh the shoes that don't fit at all and are suffocating the wearer's feet? they are hideous.

    ReplyDelete
  156. How gauche to blog a fake convo with a cancer stricken friend about your weight, such a frivolous matter. This women has zero self- awareness.

    ReplyDelete
  157. some clarification on the whole was-or-wasnt it the bloomberg after party. if we are going to be technical, bloomberg had 2 after dinner events. One was the post dinner reception (with an open bar,held in the monroe room at the hilton, yes the same room as the pre dinner reception, but nonetheless an organized event). the other was the more popular, highly regarded vf/bloomberg after party at the french embassy, which appears the photo was NOT taken at. SO i guess she should have captioned it "bloomberg post recpetion"

    ReplyDelete
  158. Randi's yellow chompersMay 11, 2009 at 10:56 PM

    I am indeed sad :(, Dyspeptic! But tonight I am also celebrating the wonder of Randi Zuckerberg's mustard tinted dentures!

    5'5" and 139#. That's pretty chubbeh!

    Again, nothing "wrong" with being chubbeh. But in her case...oh, it's too good. She acts as smug as if she weighed 110. No shamu. (Meant to type "no shame" but I'm keeping it...too perfect)

    ReplyDelete
  159. I'm thinking Jackles is not riding Randi Zzzzzz's coattails to Manta Media Day at Sea World. She still has her mojo, peeps!

    ReplyDelete
  160. Expired Dating ColumnistMay 11, 2009 at 11:09 PM

    Everyone: "Yes Dan we know you have cancer, but what's the matter with Julia? Is she feeling run down?"

    ReplyDelete
  161. Note to Randi Z - take your arm off your fucking hip, you look like a douchebag Julia Allison wannabe.

    ReplyDelete
  162. I dunno about all this Randi-snarking. I'm totally fine with harping on Jules for the fake veneers, nose job, wonk eye, etc. because they are all fake fake fake, but Randi? Really? Who gives a shit if they choose not to artificially bleach their teeth to an unnatural shade of white? Isn't it a bit hypocrital to hate on JA for getting injections and tinkering with her natural state, then to hate on Randi for NOT doing so?

    ReplyDelete
  163. Dyspep - What a jackass. She's constantly braying about how she needs a vacation, so I'm sure in her twisted mind (b/c it's known as "Media Day") the trip to SeaWorld is "work".

    ReplyDelete
  164. I am sure Dan would be happy to gain a few pounds. What an insensitive creep!

    ReplyDelete
  165. Randi's Yellow ChompersMay 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM

    Yeah, it's pretty lame to harp on Randi Z. But her teeth are YELLOW and they freak me out, especially when she is grinning proudly ear to ear. My teeth only look like that after about 4 cups of coffee when I haven't brushed in as many hours.

    But you're right. No one gives a shit (besides me).
    Carry on.

    ReplyDelete
  166. 11:11 - Randi is quickly turning into that loser kid in high school who you felt sorry for and hung out with, only to find out that she's actually a jerk underneath all the loserdom.

    ReplyDelete
  167. First, Do No WonkMay 11, 2009 at 11:33 PM

    Thanks, Dyspeptic! With my *actual* geek interest in medicine, I think the handle fits.

    Also, as someone who has survived the cancer, Julia's cancer braying definitely makes me the most crazy of all her narcissistic headband antics. Maybe she could borrow a little bit of chemo from Dan because, let me tell you all, it is a weight loss miracle drug! If Dr. Bobby would provide her a short course, she'd be back to her fighting weight in no time. And she would be such a good friend to Dan, really getting what he's going through.

    ReplyDelete
  168. I love how incredulous she is about her weight. She really thinks anyone will be fooled by a basketful of vegetables and the "one bite" lie. I am 5'5" and she has to weigh at least 150 right now. The thing is, if she was offering compelling content, the weight discussion would persist only among the bitchiest of her detractors.

    She calls it "very strange" that people assume she is unhappy. Julia, that is an indication that your life appears horrible, and everyone feels sorry for you.

    ReplyDelete
  169. Jankle's Got BackMay 11, 2009 at 11:49 PM

    I seem to recall reading somewhere that Jankles is 5'4". I bet she's easily a good buck fifty. So, yeah, pretty chunky for her height.

    You guys are KILLING it tonight:

    Favorite new handle: Randi's Yellow Chompers

    Best line of the night: 'First, Do No Wonk'

    ReplyDelete
  170. Randi's yellow chompersMay 12, 2009 at 12:06 AM

    Anon 11:48 -
    The thing is, if she was offering compelling content, the weight discussion would persist only among the bitchiest of her detractors.

    Yep. No one pays attention if you're engaging us in other ways, Jules.

    And Randi will always be "Old Yeller" to me! :-D

    ReplyDelete
  171. Watched today's TMI. JA calls Forman out for saying "I love you" after just four weeks. It is bleeped but it is crystal clear that she says Charles. She always makes him look like such a sap.

    ReplyDelete
  172. i am 5'5 and i way 150 and i don't look like that -- just one chin, thnx

    160 i'd say, easy

    ReplyDelete
  173. Hahaha, someone called her out on the "afterparty" nonsense:

    asianista @JuliaAllison http://twitpic.com/4xfik - Too bad this was at the pre-party, didn't see you at the French ambassador's.

    ReplyDelete
  174. What is the issue with her incorrectly captioning a photo besides it being misleading in a timeframe sense? I'm Australian so don't know much about the whcd. Is the Bloomberg after-party well known as a very exclusive event?

    Btw, what's with all the body hating on this thread?! It's disgusting and brings this site down - way down - as in below NonSociety's level.

    ReplyDelete
  175. Oh my darling.

    Jackles lied about being at the most exclusive party that night -- or mislead her readers. This is trashy.

    I think the body ish is again about her lies. I only had one bite! Who cares? Her weight is a focus because she isn't doing anything else and is obvi totally obsessed about it herself.

    And if she is 'stress eating' as she claims -- what is causing the stress? Certainly it is not overwork.

    Just saying.

    Even at the plumper weight, she'd still be hawt if it weren't for all the botox, wonk and dressing/styling herself for crap.

    Competent career women call pull off Jackles new curves if they dress for it. She doesn't and she has no better qualities. So in short, she's fucked.

    ReplyDelete